Advertisement

The Extrahepatic Glissonian Versus Hilar Dissection Approach for Laparoscopic Formal Right and Left Hepatectomies in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

  • Fei Liu
  • YongGang WeiEmail author
  • Kefei Chen
  • HongYu Li
  • Wentao Wang
  • Hong Wu
  • Tianfu Wen
  • Bo LiEmail author
Original Article
  • 104 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Few studies have been performed to evaluate the value of the Glissonian approach (GA) for laparoscopic formal hemihepatectomy. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of extrahepatic GA with those of the conventional hilar dissection approach for laparoscopic formal right and left hepatectomies in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Between January 2015 and October 2017, a total of 95 HCC patients who underwent pure laparoscopic formal hemihepatectomies, of whom 49 underwent the GA, were included in this study. After a 1:1 propensity score matching, 42 laparoscopic GA hepatectomies were compared to 42 conventional approach (CA) hepatectomies. We have analyzed perioperative and oncologic outcomes of the two different operative approaches for HCC treatments.

Results

The GA did not increase the postoperative overall complication rates (P = 0.415) or the mean comprehensive complication index (P = 0.414) when compared with the CA. However, the operative time was significantly shorter (P = 0.006), and intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in the GA group than in the CA group. There were no significant differences between the GA and CA groups regarding 3-year overall survival rate (P = 0.765) or 3-year disease-free survival rate (P = 0.622).

Conclusions

Pure laparoscopic extrahepatic GA hemihepatectomy is safe and feasible, and it was associated with similar complication rates and equivalent 3-year survival outcomes compared to the conventional approach in selected patients with HCC.

Keywords

Laparoscopic hepatectomy Extrahepatic Glissonian approach Hilar dissection approach Hepatocellular carcinoma 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank LetPub (www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author Contribution

Fei Liu: designed research/study, performed research/study, collected data, analyzed data, wrote the paper, and edited the manuscript. Yonggang Wei and Kefei Chen: performed research/study, collected data, analyzed data, and reviewed/edited the manuscript. Hongyu Li: collected data, analyzed data, and reviewed/edited the manuscript. Wentao Wang and Hong Wu: designed research/study, acquired data, and reviewed the manuscript. Tianfu Wen and Bo Li: designed research/study, performed research/study, reviewed the manuscript, and revised the manuscript.

Funding Information

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81602910) and the Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities (No. 2017SCU11045).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11605_2019_4135_Fig4_ESM.png (1.3 mb)
Figure S1

The right Glissonian pedicle was transected by a linear stapler while the tape was retracted toward the left side. (PNG 1314 kb)

11605_2019_4135_MOESM1_ESM.tif (1.3 mb)
High resolution image (TIF 1348 kb)
11605_2019_4135_MOESM2_ESM.doc (38 kb)
Table S1 (DOC 38 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Dokmak S, Raut V, Aussilhou B, et al. Laparoscopic left lateral resection is the gold standard for benign liver lesions: a case-control study. HPB (Oxford) 2014; 16:183–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wakabayashi G, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 2015; 261:619–629.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen P, Bie P, Liu J, Dong J. Laparoscopic left hemihepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(4):717–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang Y, Huang J, Chen XM, Sun DL. A Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Left Hemihepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2016;26:146–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Han HS, Yoon YS, Cho JY, et al. Laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:2090–2091.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Machado MA, Makdissi FF, Surjan RC, et al. Laparoscopic right hemihepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. Surg Endosc 2008;22:245.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lortat-Jacob JL, Robert HG, Henry C. [Case of right segmental hepatectomy]. Memoires Academie de chirurgie. 1952;78(8–9):244–51.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Launois B, Jamieson GG. The posterior intrahepatic approach for hepatectomy or removal of segments of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;174:155–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Takasaki K, Kobayashi S, Tanaka S, et al. Highly anatomically systematized hepatic resection with Glissonean sheath code transection at the hepatic hilus. Int Surg 1990;75:73–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Galperin EI, Karagiulian SR. A new simplified method of selective exposure of hepatic pedicles for controlled hepatectomies. HPB Surg 1989;1:119–30.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Couinaud CM. A simplified method for controlled left hepatectomy. Surgery 1985; 97: 358–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Takasaki K, Kobayashi S, Tanaka S. Newly developed systematized hepatectomy by Glissonean pedicle transection method. Shujutsu 1986;40:7–14.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Machado MA, Makdissi FF, Galvao FH, Machado MC. Intrahepatic Glissonian approach for laparoscopic right segmental liver resections. American Journal of Surgery. 2008;196:e38–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cho A, Yamamoto H, Kainuma O, et al. Safe and feasible extrahepatic Glissonean access in laparoscopic anatomical liver resection. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:1333–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Machado MA, Surjan RC, Basseres T, et al. The laparoscopic Glissonian approach is safe and efficient when compared with standard laparoscopic liver resection: Results of an observational study over 7 years. Surgery. 2016;160:643–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yamamoto M, Takasaki K, Ohtsubo T, Katsuragawa H, Fukuda C, Katagiri S.Effectiveness of systematized hepatectomy with Glisson’s pedicle transection at the hepatic hilus for small nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: retrospective analysis. Surgery. 2001;130:443–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tsuruta K, Okamoto A, Toi M, et al. Impact of selective Glisson transection on survival of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatogastroenterology 2002;49:1607–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu F, Zhang J, Lei C, Wei Y, Li B. Feasibility of laparoscopic major hepatectomy for hepatic paragonimiasis: two case reports. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(38):e4939.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu F, Wei Y, Li H, et al. LigaSure versus CUSA for parenchymal transection during laparoscopic hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with cirrhosis: a propensity score-matched analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:2454–2465.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tranchart H, O'Rourke N, Van Dam R, et al. Bleeding control during laparoscopic liver resection: a review of literature. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015; 22:371–378.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg 2013; 258:1–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB 2011;13(8): 528–535.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Koch M, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Bile leakage after hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: a definition and grading of severity by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Surgery 2011; 149: 680–688.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Figueras J, Llado L, Ruiz D, et al. Complete versus selective portal triad clamping for minor liver resections: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg.2005; 241:582–590.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, et al. Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery. 2011; 149: 713–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guo S, Fraser MW. Propensity Score Analysis: Statistical Methods and Applications. Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences Series. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc; 2010.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lin NC, Nitta H, Wakabayashi G. Laparoscopic major hepatectomy: a systematic literature review and comparison of 3 techniques. Ann Surg. 2013;257:205–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tzanis D, Shivathirthan N, Laurent A, et al. European experience of laparoscopic major hepatectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013;20:120–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dagher I, Gayet B, Tzanis D, et al. International experience for laparoscopic major liver resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014;21:732–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Figueras J, Lopez-Ben S, Lladó L, et al. Hilar dissection versus the “glissonean” approach and stapling of the pedicle for major hepatectomies: a prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2003 ;238:111–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fong Y, Blumgart L. Useful stapling techniques in liver surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 1997; 185:93–100.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Liu F, Xu H, Li Q, et al. Outcomes of pure laparoscopic Glissonian pedicle approach hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug 17. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6380-0
  34. 34.
    Karamarkovic A, Doklestic K, Milic N, et al. Glissonean pedicle approach in major liver resections. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012;59:1896–901.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Machado NO. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in cirrhotics. JSLS. 2012;16:392–400.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mouly C, Fuks D, Browet F, et al. Feasibility of the Glissonian approach during right hepatectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2013;15:638–45.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Liver Surgery&Liver Transplantation Center, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  2. 2.Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduChina

Personalised recommendations