Advertisement

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 23, Issue 7, pp 1349–1361 | Cite as

Long-Term Outcomes in Laparoscopic D2 Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: a Large Comprehensive Study Proposing Novel Hypotheses

  • Lei HuangEmail author
  • Hao Liu
  • Jiang Yu
  • Tian Lin
  • Yan-Feng Hu
  • Tuan-Jie LiEmail author
  • Guo-Xin LiEmail author
Original Article
  • 168 Downloads

Abstract

Background

The long-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) versus open gastrectomy (OG) for gastric cancer (GC) remain obscure, especially for advanced cancer and disease affecting the upper stomach and in older patients. This study aimed to comprehensively assess the long-term efficacy of LG for GC using a large prospective database.

Methods

Totally, 1877 consecutive patients (1186 receiving LG and 691 OG) operated in 2004–2016 were analyzed, with a median follow-up of 63 months. Association of LG versus OG with disease-specific survival (DSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) overall and in various subgroups were investigated using multivariable Cox regression. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for sensitivity analysis.

Results

Before PSM, overall, there was no significant association of LG versus OG with survival after multivariable adjustment; however, in subgroup analyses, LG was associated with superior DSS in patients aged ≥ 70 years and those with upper GC. No significant associations regarding DFS were observed overall or in stratifications. PSM analyses revealed that LG was associated with better DSS also in patients aged ≥ 70 years (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.15–0.72) and in those with upper GC (HR = 0.51, 95% CI = 0.29–0.91), and with better DFS in those with upper GC (HR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.37–0.99). Multivariable analysis showed that age, hepatitis B, performance status, tumor histology, stage, and vascular invasion were significantly associated with post-LG survival. LG-specific nomograms were then constructed with concordance indexes of 0.814 (DSS) and 0.809 (DFS) and excellent calibration.

Conclusions

In this large institutional analysis, while LG for GC was associated with DSS and DFS similar to those for OG overall, non-inferior LG-associated survival especially DSS was observed in some subgroups rarely investigated in prospective or randomized settings. There could still be biases even after PSM due to confounders not accounted for in this observational study. However, these findings offer novel hypotheses for further validation.

Keywords

Gastric cancer Laparoscopic gastrectomy Open gastrectomy Long-term outcomes Propensity score matching Nomogram 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the documenters in Nanfang Hospital for data collection, and to members of the Chinese Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study Group, the Chinese Gastric Cancer Association, the Chinese Society of Laparo-Endoscopic Surgery, and the Chinese Society of Gastrointestinal Surgery for support.

Author Contributions

Lei Huang had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Conception and design: Lei Huang, Tuan-Jie Li, Guo-Xin Li

Collection and assembly of data: All authors

Analysis and interpretation of data: Lei Huang, Tuan-Jie Li, Guo-Xin Li

Drafting of manuscript: Lei Huang

Critical revision of manuscript: Tuan-Jie Li, Guo-Xin Li

All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript for publication.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from State’s Key Project of Research and Development Plan (2017YFC0108300 and 2017YFC0108301), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81672446), Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Key Project (2014A020215014), Research Fund of Public Welfare in the Health Industry, the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China (201402015), the Southern Medical University Clinical Research Start-Up Project (LC2016ZD003), Guangzhou Science and Technology Project (201400000004-5), the Key Clinical Specialty Discipline Construction Program ([2011]170), and President Funding of Nanfang Hospital (2016B010). The funders had no role in study design, in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, or in the writing of the report.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

11605_2018_4008_MOESM1_ESM.docx (427 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 426 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2015;65(2):87–108.  https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21262.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ajani JA, D'Amico TA, Almhanna K, Bentrem DJ, Chao J, Das P et al. Gastric Cancer, Version 3.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016;14(10):1286–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Japanese Gastric Cancer A. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2017;20(1):1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology / ESMO. 2016;27(suppl 5):v38-v49.  https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES et al. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1324–32.  https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1414882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    de Rooij T, van Hilst J, Topal B, Bosscha K, Brinkman DJ, Gerhards MF et al. Outcomes of a Multicenter Training Program in Laparoscopic Pancreatoduodenectomy (LAELAPS-2). Ann Surg. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002563.
  7. 7.
    Kelly KJ, Selby L, Chou JF, Dukleska K, Capanu M, Coit DG et al. Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma in the West: A Case-Control Study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(11):3590–6.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-015-4381-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strong VE. Defining the role of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(7):613–4.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.52.9479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li HJ, Huang L, Li TJ, Su J, Peng LR, Liu W. Short-Term Outcomes of Single-Incision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Diseases: Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Prospective Evidence. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(11):1931–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3520-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xu AM, Huang L, Li TJ. Single-incision versus three-port laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(4):822–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3735-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vinuela EF, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Coit DG, Strong VE. Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies. Ann Surg. 2012;255(3):446–56.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824682f4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zeng YK, Yang ZL, Peng JS, Lin HS, Cai L. Laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: evidence from randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials. Ann Surg. 2012;256(1):39–52.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182583e2e.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW et al. Decreased Morbidity of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open Distal Gastrectomy for Stage I Gastric Cancer: Short-term Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg. 2016;263(1):28–35.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report—a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010;251(3):417–20.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katai H, Sasako M, Fukuda H, Nakamura K, Hiki N, Saka M et al. Safety and feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG 0703). Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. 2010;13(4):238–44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-010-0565-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J et al. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(12):1350–7.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nakamura K, Katai H, Mizusawa J, Yoshikawa T, Ando M, Terashima M et al. A phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric Cancer (JCOG0912). Japanese journal of clinical oncology. 2013;43(3):324–7.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hys220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T, Uchiyama K, Katada N, Koeda K et al. A Multi-institutional, Prospective, Phase II Feasibility Study of Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy with D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (JLSSG0901). World J Surg. 2015;39(11):2734–41.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3160-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hur H, Lee HY, Lee HJ, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Park YK et al. Efficacy of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: the protocol of the KLASS-02 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:355.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1365-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Sansonetti A, Di Paola M, Recher A et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg. 2005;241(2):232–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Visvanathan K, Levit LA, Raghavan D, Hudis CA, Wong S, Dueck A et al. Untapped Potential of Observational Research to Inform Clinical Decision Making: American Society of Clinical Oncology Research Statement. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2017;35(16):1845–54.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.72.6414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Worhunsky DJ, Ma Y, Zak Y, Poultsides GA, Norton JA, Rhoads KF et al. Compliance with gastric cancer guidelines is associated with improved outcomes. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015;13(3):319–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Washington K. 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: stomach. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(12):3077–9.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1362-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hess KR. Assessing time-by-covariate interactions in proportional hazards regression models using cubic spline functions. Stat Med. 1994;13(10):1045–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Harrell FE, Jr., Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15(4):361–87.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO;2-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Kim W, Lee HJ et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(7):627–33.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujii K, Yasuda K, Inomata M, Adachi Y. A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report. Surgery. 2002;131(1 Suppl):S306–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Uyama I, Sugioka A, Fujita J, Komori Y, Matsui H, Hasumi A. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy with distal pancreatosplenectomy and D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. 1999;2(4):230–4.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s101209900041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee J, Kim W. Long-term outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: analysis of consecutive 106 experiences. Journal of surgical oncology. 2009;100(8):693–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Huang JL, Wei HB, Zheng ZH, Wei B, Chen TF, Huang Y et al. Laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Digestive surgery. 2010;27(4):291–6.  https://doi.org/10.1159/000281818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li GX, Zhang C, Yu J, Wang YN, Hu YF. A new order of D2 lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer: live anatomy-based dissection. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010;19(6):355–63.  https://doi.org/10.3109/13645706.2010.527775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Goh PM, Khan AZ, So JB, Lomanto D, Cheah WK, Muthiah R et al. Early experience with laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques. 2001;11(2):83–7.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Fujitani K, Yang HK, Mizusawa J, Kim YW, Terashima M, Han SU et al. Gastrectomy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for advanced gastric cancer with a single non-curable factor (REGATTA): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(3):309–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00553-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kodera Y, Fujitani K, Fukushima N, Ito S, Muro K, Ohashi N et al. Surgical resection of hepatic metastasis from gastric cancer: a review and new recommendation in the Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17(2):206–12.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-013-0299-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cho GS, Kim W, Kim HH, Ryu SW, Kim MC, Ryu SY. Multicentre study of the safety of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the elderly. Br J Surg. 2009;96(12):1437–42.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fujisaki M, Shinohara T, Hanyu N, Kawano S, Tanaka Y, Watanabe A et al. Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the elderly patients. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(4):1380–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4340-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kim MG, Kim HS, Kim BS, Kwon SJ. The impact of old age on surgical outcomes of totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(11):3990–7.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3073-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Suzuki S, Nakamura T, Imanishi T, Kanaji S, Yamamoto M, Kanemitsu K et al. Carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum led to no severe morbidities for the elderly during laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(5):1548–54.  https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4182-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mohri Y, Yasuda H, Ohi M, Tanaka K, Saigusa S, Okigami M et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(6):1627–35.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3856-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Veenhof AA, Vlug MS, van der Pas MH, Sietses C, van der Peet DL, de Lange-de Klerk ES et al. Surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopy or open surgery with fast track or standard perioperative care: a randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2012;255(2):216–21.  https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824336e2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bouvy ND, Marquet RL, Jeekel J, Bonjer HJ. Laparoscopic surgery is associated with less tumour growth stimulation than conventional surgery: an experimental study. Br J Surg. 1997;84(3):358–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Huang L, Xu AM. Adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: controversial classification, surgical management, and clinicopathology. Chin J Cancer Res. 2014;26(3):226–30.  https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2014.06.14.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lee JH, Nam BH, Ryu KW, Ryu SY, Park YK, Kim S et al. Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. The British journal of surgery. 2015;102(12):1500–5.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Han DS, Suh YS, Kong SH, Lee HJ, Choi Y, Aikou S et al. Nomogram predicting long-term survival after d2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(31):3834–40.  https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.41.8343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    D’Agostino RB, Jr. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group. Statistics in medicine. 1998;17(19):2265–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryNanfang Hospital, Southern Medical UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations