Evolving the Paradigm of Early Drain Removal Following Pancreatoduodenectomy
Recent data illustrates improved outcomes when adhering to early drain removal following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). This study aims to explore the potential benefits of expanding the timeframe for early drain removal.
Six hundred forty PDs were originally managed by selective drain placement and early removal. Outcomes were reappraised in the framework of a novel proposal; intraoperative drains were omitted based on a low-risk profile (Fistula Risk Score 0–2), followed by drain removal at PODs 1, 3, and 5 if drain fluid amylase (DFA) fell below specific cutoffs based on optimized negative predictive values (NPV) for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF). Characteristics of the remaining cohort with drains in situ on POD5 were examined using multivariable analysis (MVA).
Intraoperative FRS would preclude drains from 230 (35.9%) negligible/low-risk cases with a cohort CR-POPF rate of 1.7%. Of the remaining patients, 30.5% would have drains removed on POD1 based on a DFA threshold of 300 IU/L (NPV = 98.4%), demonstrating a 1.6% CR-POPF rate. On POD3, drains could be removed in the residual cohort from 21.1% of patients with DFA ≤ 150 IU/L (NPV = 96.6%), reflecting a 3.4% CR-POPF rate. On POD5, a DFA threshold of 50 IU/L (NPV = 84%) identified 16.3% more patients whose drains could be removed. The remaining cohort (POD5 DFA > 50 IU/L), “enriched” for fistula development and reflecting just 18.4% of the original patients, displays a 61% CR-POPF rate. Among these patients on POD5, a DFA threshold > 2000 IU/L best predicted subsequent CR-POPF (PPV = 89.5%), and MVA revealed a positive association between pancreatic cancer/pancreatitis (OR = 4.37, p = 0.022) and longer operations (OR = 3.74, p = 0.014) with CR-POPF development.
Early drain removal is a dynamic concept and can be employed throughout the postoperative time course using conditional thresholds to better identify patients at risk for CR-POPF.
KeywordsPancreatoduodenectomy Early removal Fistula CR-POPF Amylase Drain
- 1.Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H, et al. Early removal of Prophylactic Drains Reduces the Risk of Intra-abdominal Infections in Patients With Pancreatic Head Resection: Prospective Study for 104 Consecutive Patients. Ann Surg. 2006;244(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000218077.14035.a6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.McMillan MT, Fisher WE, Van Buren G, et al. The Value of Drains as a Fistula Mitigation Strategy for Pancreatoduodenectomy: Something for Everyone? Results of a Randomized Prospective Multi-institutional Study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(1):21–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2640-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Villafane-Ferriol N, Buren G Van, Mendez-Reyes JE, et al. Sequential drain amylase to guide drain removal following pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford). 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.11.008
- 11.Beane JD, House MG, Ceppa EP, Dolejs SC, Pitt HA. Variation in Drain Management After Pancreatoduodenectomy: Early Versus Delayed Removal. Ann Surg. 2017:1. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002570
- 16.Maggino L, Malleo G, Bassi C, et al. Decoding Grade B Pancreatic Fistula: A Clinical and Economical Analysis and Subclassification Proposal. Ann Surg. 2018:1. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002673
- 20.Ecker BL, McMillan MT, Allegrini V, et al. Risk Factors and Mitigation Strategies for Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy: Analysis of 2026 Resections From the International, Multi-institutional Distal Pancreatectomy Study Group. Ann Surg. 2017:1. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000002491
- 21.Maggino L, Liu JB, Ecker BL, Pitt HA, Vollmer CM. Impact of Operative Time on Outcomes after Pancreatic Resection: A Risk-Adjusted Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP Database. J Am Coll Surg. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.01.004