Advertisement

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 22, Issue 12, pp 2037–2044 | Cite as

Practical Contribution of Virtual Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Propensity-Matched Analysis of Clinical Outcome

  • Takeshi Takamoto
  • Keiji Sano
  • Takuya Hashimoto
  • Akihiko Ichida
  • Kei Shimada
  • Yoshikazu Maruyama
  • Masatoshi Makuuchi
Original Article
  • 74 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Recent improvements in imaging technologies have enabled surgeons to perform precise planning using virtual hepatectomy (VH). However, the practical and clinical benefits of VH remain unclear. This study sought to assess how three-dimensional analysis using a VH contributed to preoperative planning and postoperative outcome in patients undergoing liver surgery for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).

Methods

From 2007 to 2017, a total of 473 CRLM patients who received curative hepatectomy were retrospectively assessed. A 1:1 matched propensity analysis was performed between patients who did not receive a VH (without 3D group: n = 188) and received a VH (3D(+) group: n = 285).

Result

The rate of VH increased over the study period (P < 0.001). After propensity score matching (n = 150 for each group), no significant differences were observed in the intraoperative and postoperative outcome, including liver transection time, blood loss, or morbidity between the groups. More patients received a small anatomical resection (plus limited resections) in the 3D(+) group (25 vs 11%, [P = 0.03]). A submillimeter margin was less frequent in the 3D(+) group. No significant differences in the 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were seen between the without 3D group and the 3D(+) group (38.0 vs. 45.9% [P = 0.99], 11.1 vs. 21.7%, respectively [P = 0.109]).

Conclusion

Although VH did not significantly influenced on the long-term outcome after hepatectomy, a more parenchymal-sparing operative procedure (anatomical resections, plus limited resections) was selected and the risk of a submillimeter surgical margin was reduced after introduction of VH.

Keywords

Liver resection 3D simulation Virtual hepatectomy Colorectal liver metastases Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy Anatomical hepatectomy 

Notes

Author Contribution Statement

Takeshi Takamoto performed data analysis and wrote the manuscript with support from Keiji Sano, Takuya Hashimoto, Akihiko Ichida, Kei Shimada, Yoshikazu Maruyama, and Masatoshi Makuuchi. All authors contributed to data collection, discussed the results, and contributed to the final manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The Institutional Review Board of our hospital approved this study protocol (2017-767).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Saito S, Yamanaka J, Miura K, Nakao N, Nagao T, Sugimoto T et al. A novel 3D hepatectomy simulation based on liver circulation: application to liver resection and transplantation. Hepatology. 2005;41(6):1297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hamady ZZ, Lodge JP, Welsh FK, Toogood GJ, White A, John T et al. One-millimeter cancer-free margin is curative for colorectal liver metastases: a propensity score case-match approach. Ann Surg. 2014;259(3):543–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mise Y, Hasegawa K, Satou S, Shindoh J, Miki K, Akamatsu N et al. How Has Virtual Hepatectomy Changed the Practice of Liver Surgery?: Experience of 1194 Virtual Hepatectomy Before Liver Resection and Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Ann Surg. 2017.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mise Y, Hasegawa K, Satou S, Aoki T, Beck Y, Sugawara Y et al. Venous reconstruction based on virtual liver resection to avoid congestion in the liver remnant. The British journal of surgery. 2011;98(12):1742–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marescaux J, Clement JM, Tassetti V, Koehl C, Cotin S, Russier Y et al. Virtual reality applied to hepatic surgery simulation: the next revolution. Annals of Surgery. 1998;228(5):627–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lang H, Radtke A, Hindennach M, Schroeder T, Fruhauf NR, Malago M et al. Impact of virtual tumor resection and computer-assisted risk analysis on operation planning and intraoperative strategy in major hepatic resection. Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill : 1960). 2005;140(7):629–38; discussion 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Radtke A, Sotiropoulos GC, Molmenti EP, Schroeder T, Peitgen HO, Frilling A et al. Computer-assisted surgery planning for complex liver resections: when is it helpful? A single-center experience over an 8-year period. Ann Surg. 2010;252(5):876–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takamoto T, Hashimoto T, Ogata S, Inoue K, Maruyama Y, Miyazaki A et al. Planning of anatomical liver segmentectomy and subsegmentectomy with 3-dimensional simulation software. Am J Surg. 2013;206(4):530–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nakayama K, Oshiro Y, Miyamoto R, Kohno K, Fukunaga K, Ohkohchi N. The Effect of Three-Dimensional Preoperative Simulation on Liver Surgery. World J Surg. 2017;41(7):1840–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kopetz S, Chang GJ, Overman MJ, Eng C, Sargent DJ, Larson DW et al. Improved survival in metastatic colorectal cancer is associated with adoption of hepatic resection and improved chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(22):3677–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adam R, De Gramont A, Figueras J, Guthrie A, Kokudo N, Kunstlinger F et al. The oncosurgery approach to managing liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a multidisciplinary international consensus. Oncologist. 2012;17(10):1225–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Makuuchi M, Kosuge T, Takayama T, Yamazaki S, Kakazu T, Miyagawa S et al. Surgery for small liver cancers. Semin Surg Oncol. 1993;9(4):298–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shindoh J, Tzeng CW, Aloia TA, Curley SA, Zimmitti G, Wei SH et al. Portal vein embolization improves rate of resection of extensive colorectal liver metastases without worsening survival. Br J Surg. 2013;100(13):1777–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Takamoto T, Hashimoto T, Ichida A, Shimada K, Maruyama Y, Makuuchi M. Surgical Strategy Based on Indocyanine Green Test for Chemotherapy-Associated Liver Injury and Long-Term Outcome in Colorectal Liver Metastases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Takamoto T, Hashimoto T, Inoue K, Nagashima D, Maruyama Y, Mitsuka Y et al. Applicability of enhanced recovery program for advanced liver surgery. World J Surg. 2014;38(10):2676–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S. Ultrasonically guided subsegmentectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1985;161(4):346–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yamamoto J, Sugihara K, Kosuge T, Takayama T, Shimada K, Yamasaki S et al. Pathologic support for limited hepatectomy in the treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 1995;221(1):74–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kokudo N, Miki Y, Sugai S, Yanagisawa A, Kato Y, Sakamoto Y et al. Genetic and histological assessment of surgical margins in resected liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma: minimum surgical margins for successful resection. Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill : 1960). 2002;137(7):833–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zorzi D, Mullen JT, Abdalla EK, Pawlik TM, Andres A, Muratore A et al. Comparison between hepatic wedge resection and anatomic resection for colorectal liver metastases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(1):86–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sarpel U, Bonavia AS, Grucela A, Roayaie S, Schwartz ME, Labow DM. Does anatomic versus nonanatomic resection affect recurrence and survival in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal liver metastasis? Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(2):379–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vigano L, Capussotti L, Majno P, Toso C, Ferrero A, De Rosa G et al. Liver resection in patients with eight or more colorectal liver metastases. Br J Surg. 2015;102(1):92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Adam R, de Haas RJ, Wicherts DA, Vibert E, Salloum C, Azoulay D et al. Concomitant extrahepatic disease in patients with colorectal liver metastases: when is there a place for surgery? Ann Surg. 2011;253(2):349–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Imamura H, Seyama Y, Kokudo N, Maema A, Sugawara Y, Sano K et al. One thousand fifty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years. Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill : 1960). 2003;138(11):1198–206; discussion 206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lamade W, Glombitza G, Fischer L, Chiu P, Cardenas CE, Sr., Thorn M et al. The impact of 3-dimensional reconstructions on operation planning in liver surgery. Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill : 1960). 2000;135(11):1256–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Divisions of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic and Liver Transplantation SurgeryJapanese Red Cross Medical CenterTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryTeikyo University School of MedicineTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations