Practical Contribution of Virtual Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Propensity-Matched Analysis of Clinical Outcome
- 21 Downloads
Recent improvements in imaging technologies have enabled surgeons to perform precise planning using virtual hepatectomy (VH). However, the practical and clinical benefits of VH remain unclear. This study sought to assess how three-dimensional analysis using a VH contributed to preoperative planning and postoperative outcome in patients undergoing liver surgery for the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).
From 2007 to 2017, a total of 473 CRLM patients who received curative hepatectomy were retrospectively assessed. A 1:1 matched propensity analysis was performed between patients who did not receive a VH (without 3D group: n = 188) and received a VH (3D(+) group: n = 285).
The rate of VH increased over the study period (P < 0.001). After propensity score matching (n = 150 for each group), no significant differences were observed in the intraoperative and postoperative outcome, including liver transection time, blood loss, or morbidity between the groups. More patients received a small anatomical resection (plus limited resections) in the 3D(+) group (25 vs 11%, [P = 0.03]). A submillimeter margin was less frequent in the 3D(+) group. No significant differences in the 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival rates were seen between the without 3D group and the 3D(+) group (38.0 vs. 45.9% [P = 0.99], 11.1 vs. 21.7%, respectively [P = 0.109]).
Although VH did not significantly influenced on the long-term outcome after hepatectomy, a more parenchymal-sparing operative procedure (anatomical resections, plus limited resections) was selected and the risk of a submillimeter surgical margin was reduced after introduction of VH.
KeywordsLiver resection 3D simulation Virtual hepatectomy Colorectal liver metastases Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy Anatomical hepatectomy
Author Contribution Statement
Takeshi Takamoto performed data analysis and wrote the manuscript with support from Keiji Sano, Takuya Hashimoto, Akihiko Ichida, Kei Shimada, Yoshikazu Maruyama, and Masatoshi Makuuchi. All authors contributed to data collection, discussed the results, and contributed to the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The Institutional Review Board of our hospital approved this study protocol (2017-767).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 3.Mise Y, Hasegawa K, Satou S, Shindoh J, Miki K, Akamatsu N et al. How Has Virtual Hepatectomy Changed the Practice of Liver Surgery?: Experience of 1194 Virtual Hepatectomy Before Liver Resection and Living Donor Liver Transplantation. Ann Surg. 2017.Google Scholar
- 6.Lang H, Radtke A, Hindennach M, Schroeder T, Fruhauf NR, Malago M et al. Impact of virtual tumor resection and computer-assisted risk analysis on operation planning and intraoperative strategy in major hepatic resection. Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill : 1960). 2005;140(7):629–38; discussion 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Takamoto T, Hashimoto T, Ichida A, Shimada K, Maruyama Y, Makuuchi M. Surgical Strategy Based on Indocyanine Green Test for Chemotherapy-Associated Liver Injury and Long-Term Outcome in Colorectal Liver Metastases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018.Google Scholar
- 19.Kokudo N, Miki Y, Sugai S, Yanagisawa A, Kato Y, Sakamoto Y et al. Genetic and histological assessment of surgical margins in resected liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma: minimum surgical margins for successful resection. Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill : 1960). 2002;137(7):833–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar