Predictive Nomograms for Synchronous Distant Metastasis in Rectal Cancer
- 2 Downloads
Nomograms may be used to quantitatively assess the probability of synchronous distant metastasis. The purpose of this study is to develop predictive nomograms for the presence of synchronous distant metastasis in patients with rectal cancer.
A retrospective analysis of the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database was performed for cases diagnosed between 2010 and 2014.
Overall, 46,785 patients with rectal cancer (27,773 [59.4%] males, mean age 63.9 ± 13.7 years) were identified, of which 6192 (13.2%) had liver metastasis, 2767 (5.9%) had lung metastasis, and 601 (1.3%) had bone metastasis. Age, sex, race, tumor location, tumor grade, primary tumor size, CEA levels, perineural invasion, T stage, N stage, and liver and lung metastasis were found to be associated with the presence of synchronous distant metastasis and were included in the predictive models. The c-indexes of these models were 0.99 for liver metastasis, 0.99 for lung metastasis, and 1 for bone metastasis.
Predictive nomograms for the presence of synchronous liver, lung, and bone metastasis were developed and may be used to predict the probability of distant disease in rectal cancer patients.
KeywordsRectum Cancer Colorectal cancer Metastasis Liver Lung Bone
Conception/Design: Gaitanidis, Alevizakos, Pitiakoudis.
Provision of study material or patients: Gaitanidis, Alevizakos.
Collection and/or assembly of data: Gaitanidis, Alevizakos, Tsaroucha, Tsalikidis.
Data analysis and interpretation: All authors.
Manuscript drafting: Gaitanidis, Alevizakos, Tsalikidis.
Final approval of manuscript: Pitiakoudis.
All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of this work.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Katoh M, Unakami M, Hara M, Fukuchi S. Bone metastasis from colorectal cancer in autopsy cases. J Gastroenterol. 1995;30(5):615–618. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8574333. Accessed February 25, 2018.
- 11.Nordholm-Carstensen A, Wille-Jørgensen PA, Jorgensen LN, Harling H. Indeterminate pulmonary nodules at colorectal cancer staging: a systematic review of predictive parameters for malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(12):4022–4030. doi: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-3062-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Yongue G, Hotouras A, Murphy J, Mukhtar H, Bhan C, Chan CL. The diagnostic yield of preoperative staging computed tomography of the thorax in colorectal cancer patients without hepatic metastases. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;27(4):467–470. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000315 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.National Cancer Institute. Overview of the SEER Program. 2013. https://seer.cancer.gov/about/overview.html.
- 15.Yang D. Build prognostic nomograms for risk assessment using SAS. SAS Glob Forum 2013. 2013;(264):1–7.Google Scholar
- 17.Harrell FE, Lee KL, Califf RM, Pryor DB, Rosati RA. Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction Stat Med. 3(2):143–152. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6463451. Accessed 31 July , 2017.
- 18.Choi DJ, Kwak JM, Kim J, Woo SU, Kim SH. Preoperative chest computerized tomography in patients with locally advanced mid or lower rectal cancer: its role in staging and impact on treatment strategy. J Surg Oncol. 2010;102(6):588–592. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21651 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Kronawitter U, Kemeny NE, Heelan R, Fata F, Fong Y. Evaluation of chest computed tomography in the staging of patients with potentially resectable liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;86(2):229–235. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10421258. Accessed 11 November 2017.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar