Advertisement

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 508–515 | Cite as

Perioperative Factors Predicting Prolonged Postoperative Ileus After Major Abdominal Surgery

  • Kotaro Sugawara
  • Yoshikuni Kawaguchi
  • Yukihiro Nomura
  • Yusuke Suka
  • Keishi Kawasaki
  • Yukari Uemura
  • Daisuke Koike
  • Motoki Nagai
  • Takatoshi Furuya
  • Nobutaka Tanaka
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Prolonged postoperative ileus (PPOI) is among the common complications adversely affecting postoperative outcomes. Predictors of PPOI after major abdominal surgery remain unclear, although various PPOI predictors have been reported in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. This study aimed to devise a model for stratifying the probability of PPOI in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

Methods

Between 2012 and 2013, 841 patients underwent major abdominal surgery after excluding patients who underwent less-invasive abdominal surgery, ileus-associated surgery, and emergency surgery. Postoperative managements were generally based on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. The definition of PPOI was based on nausea, no oral diet, flatus absence, abdominal distension, and radiographic findings. A nomogram was devised by evaluating predictive factors for PPOI.

Results

Of the 841 patients, 73 (8.8%) developed PPOI. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed smoking history (P = 0.025), colorectal surgery (P = 0.004), and an open surgical approach (P = 0.002) to all be independent predictive factors for PPOI. A nomogram was devised by employing these three significant predictive factors. The prediction model showed relatively good discrimination performance, the concordance index of which was 0.71 (95%CI 0.66–0.77). The probability of PPOI in patients with a smoking history who underwent open colorectal surgery was calculated to be 19.6%.

Conclusions

Colorectal surgery, open abdominal surgery, and smoking history were found to be independent predictive factors for PPOI in patients who underwent major abdominal surgery. A nomogram based on these factors was shown to be useful for identifying patients with a high probability of developing PPOI.

Keywords

Postoperative prolonged ileus Nomogram Colorectal surgery Upper gastrointestinal surgery Laparoscopic surgery 

Abbreviations

ASA

American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification system

BMI

Body mass index

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

EBL

Estimated blood loss

eGFR

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

ERAS

Enhanced recovery after surgery

IQR

Interquartile range

PNI

Prognostic nutritional index

POD

Postoperative day

PPOI

Postoperative prolonged ileus

PS

Performance status

WBC

White blood cell count

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank members of the Clinical Research Support Center in Asahi General Hospital for data acquisition and for providing helpful insights.

Authors’ Contributions

The conception or design of the work: Sugawara, Kawaguchi, Nomura, Tanaka.

The acquisition of data for the work: Sugawara, Suka, Kawasaki.

The analysis of data for the work: Sugawara, Kawaguchi, Uemura, Koike, Nagai, Furuya.

The interpretation of data for the work: Sugawara, Kawaguchi, Nomura, Tanaka.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Type of Study

Retrospective.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Hwang GS, Hanna MH, et al.: Risk factors for prolonged ileus following colon surgery. Surgical endoscopy 2016;30:603–609.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vather R, Trivedi S, Bissett I: Defining postoperative ileus: results of a systematic review and global survey. Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2013;17:962–972.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chapuis PH, Bokey L, Keshava A, et al.: Risk factors for prolonged ileus after resection of colorectal cancer: an observational study of 2400 consecutive patients. Annals of surgery 2013;257:909–915.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Millan M, Biondo S, Fraccalvieri D, et al.: Risk factors for prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal cancer surgery. World journal of surgery 2012;36:179–185.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Livingston EH, Passaro EP, Jr.: Postoperative ileus. Digestive diseases and sciences 1990;35:121–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luckey A, Livingston E, Tache Y: Mechanisms and treatment of postoperative ileus. Archives Surgery (Chicago, Ill : 1960) 2003;138:206–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Asgeirsson T, El-Badawi KI, Mahmood A, et al.: Postoperative ileus: it costs more than you expect. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2010;210:228–231.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aytac E, Stocchi L, De Long J, et al.: Impact of previous midline laparotomy on the outcomes of laparoscopic intestinal resections: a case-matched study. Surgical endoscopy 2015;29:537–542.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wolthuis AM, Bislenghi G, Fieuws S, et al.: Incidence of prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal disease 2016;18:O1–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van Bree SH, Vlug MS, Bemelman WA, et al.: Faster recovery of gastrointestinal transit after laparoscopy and fast-track care in patients undergoing colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 2011;141:872-880.e871-874.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Basse L, Madsen JL, Billesbolle P, et al.: Gastrointestinal transit after laparoscopic versus open colonic resection. Surgical endoscopy 2003;17:1919–1922.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, et al.: A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for colorectal cancer. Journal of Cancer 2011;2:425–434.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holte K, Kehlet H: Postoperative ileus: a preventable event. The British journal of surgery 2000;87:1480–1493.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vlug MS, Wind J, Hollmann MW, et al.: Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: a randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Annals of surgery 2011;254:868–875.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vather R, Josephson R, Jaung R, et al.: Development of a risk stratification system for the occurrence of prolonged postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery: a prospective risk factor analysis. Surgery 2015;157:764–773.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kronberg U, Kiran RP, Soliman MS, et al.: A characterization of factors determining postoperative ileus after laparoscopic colectomy enables the generation of a novel predictive score. Annals of surgery 2011;253:78–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boelens PG, Heesakkers FF, Luyer MD, et al.: Reduction of postoperative ileus by early enteral nutrition in patients undergoing major rectal surgery: prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Annals of surgery 2014;259:649–655.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Connor S, Cross A, Sakowska M, et al.: Effects of introducing an enhanced recovery after surgery programme for patients undergoing open hepatic resection. HPB 2013;15:294–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hughes MJ, Chong J, Harrison E, Wigmore S: Short-term outcomes after liver resection for malignant and benign disease in the age of ERAS. HPB 2016;18:177–182.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Liang X, Ying H, Wang H, et al.: Enhanced recovery program versus traditional care in laparoscopic hepatectomy. Medicine 2016;95:e2835.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ljungqvist O, Scott M, Fearon KC: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. JAMA surgery 2017;152:292–298.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Joo E, Muraoka A, Hamasaki A, et al.: Enteral supplementation with glutamine, fiber, and oligosaccharide modulates incretin and glucagon-like peptide-2 secretion. Journal of diabetes investigation 2015;6:302–308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA: Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Annals of surgery 2004;240:205–213.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Group ECO: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. [Acessed 3 June 2015] ECOG performance status. http://ecog-acrin.org/resources/ecog-performance-status. In.
  25. 25.
    Seymour MT, Maughan TS, Ledermann JA, et al.: Different strategies of sequential and combination chemotherapy for patients with poor prognosis advanced colorectal cancer (MRC FOCUS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007;370:143–152.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Huang DD, Zhuang CL, Wang SL, et al.: Prediction of prolonged postoperative ileus after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a scoring system obtained from a prospective study. Medicine 2015;94:e2242.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Atkinson C, Penfold CM, Ness AR, et al.: Randomized clinical trial of postoperative chewing gum versus standard care after colorectal resection. The British journal of surgery 2016;103:962–970.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kehlet H: Surgery: Fast-track colonic surgery and the ‘knowing-doing’ gap. Nature reviews Gastroenterology & hepatology 2011;8:539–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryAsahi General HospitalAsahiJapan
  2. 2.Department of Gastrointestinal SurgeryGraduate School of Medicine, the University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of SurgeryGraduate School of Medicine, University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Biostatistics DivisionClinical Research Support Center, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of TokyoTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations