Right-Side Approach-Duet Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy (R-Duet TLDG) Using a Three-Port to Treat Gastric Cancer
Gastric cancer is commonly treated via minimally invasive surgery. The present study explored the feasibility of right-side approach-duet (R-duet) totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using a three-port compared with a four- or five-port.
A total of 251 patients who underwent curative totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer (72 R-duet, 74 four-port, and 105 five-port) at the Catholic Medical Center were enrolled. All operations were performed using conventional laparoscopic instruments. The clinicopathological characteristics, operative details, and postoperative short-term outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.
The clinicopathological characteristics did not differ significantly among the groups, except that the N stage was higher in the five-port group. The operating time was significantly longer in the four-port than the R-duet group (R-duet, four-port, and five-port 148.2 ± 30.7, 162.4 ± 30.6, and 159.9 ± 31.5 min, respectively; p = 0.024). The estimated blood loss did not differ significantly. Postoperatively, the times to flatus and to soft diet consumption and the hospital stay were significantly longer in the five-port group. The extent of postoperative complications did not differ among the groups.
R-duet totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is a reliable form of reduced-port surgery when used to treat gastric cancer; no special instruments are required.
KeywordsGastrectomy Laparoscopic surgery Minimally invasive surgery Reduced port surgery Stomach neoplasm
Ho Seok Seo, Kyo Young Song, Ji Hyun Kim, Yoon Ju Jung, Cho Hyun Park, and Han Hong Lee were responsible for the study’s conceptualization; Ho Seok Seo and Han Hong Lee for the formal analysis; Ho Seok Seo, Kyo Young Song, Ji Hyun Kim, Yoon Ju Jung, Cho Hyun Park, and Han Hong Lee for the investigation; Ji Hyun Kim and Yoon Ju Jung for the data acquisition; Ho Seok Seo, Kyo Young Song, Cho Hyun Park, and Han Hong Lee for the data interpretation; Ho Seok Seo and Han Hong Lee for the drafting; and all authors for the writing, review, critical editing, final approval, and agreement to be accountable.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The study was approved by the institutional review board of the ethics committee of the College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea (approval no. KC17RESI0110). Patient records were anonymized and de-identified prior to analysis.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Information Committee of Korean Gastric Cancer Association. Korean gastric cancer association nationwide survey on gastric cancer in 2014. J Gastric Cancer. 2016;16(3):131–40Google Scholar
- 14.Zong L, Abe M, Seto Y, Ji J. Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open d2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: how should we define the age of included patents? J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.68.2500
- 15.Mingjie X, Luyao Z, Ze T, YinQuan Z, Quan W. Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for resectable advanced gastric cancer within enhanced recovery programs: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2016 Nov 22. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2016.0057
- 16.Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW et al. Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage i gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg. 2016;263(1):28–35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Namikawa T, Kitagawa H, Okabayashi T, Sugimoto T, Kobayashi M, Hanazaki K. Roux-en-Y reconstruction is superior to billroth I reconstruction in reducing reflux esophagitis after distal gastrectomy: special relationship with the angle of his. World J Surg. 2010;34(5):1022–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar