Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 20, Issue 10, pp 1673–1678 | Cite as

Importance of esophageal manometry and pH monitoring for the evaluation of otorhinolaryngologic (ENT) manifestations of GERD. A multicenter study

  • Fernando A. M. Herbella
  • Ciro Andolfi
  • Yalini Vigneswaran
  • Marco G. Patti
  • Bruno R. Pinna
2016 SSAT Quick Shot Presentation

Abstract

Background/Aims

Patients with otorhinolaryngologic (ear, nose, and throat—ENT) symptoms attributed to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are usually treated with medication based on the findings of nasal endoscopy and laryngoscopy only. This study aims to determine sensitivity and specificity of symptoms, nasal endoscopy, and laryngoscopy for the diagnosis of GERD as compared to pH monitoring.

Methods

We studied 79 patients (mean age 53 years, 38 % males) in whom ENT symptoms were assumed to be secondary to GERD. All patients underwent a transnasal laryngoscopy by the ENT team and upper endoscopy and esophageal function tests by the surgical team. GERD was defined by a pathological pH monitoring.

Results

Pathologic reflux by pH monitoring was documented in 36 of the 79 patients (46 %), with a mean DeMeester score of 44. In 25 of the 36 patients (69 %), distal and proximal reflux was present. Among patients with negative pH monitoring, one patient was diagnosed with achalasia. ENT symptom sensitivity for globus, hoarseness and throat clearing was respectively 11, 58, and 33 %; specificity was respectively 77, 42, and 58 %. Positive predictive value for nasal endoscopy and laryngoscopy was 46 %. Among patients with positive pH monitoring, 13 (36 %) had a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter (p < 0.01) and 27 (34 %) had abnormal peristalsis (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

In conclusion, the results of this study showed that (a) ENT symptoms were unreliable for the diagnosis of GERD and (b) laryngoscopy had a low positive predictive value for the diagnosis of GERD. These data confirm the importance of esophageal manometry and pH monitoring in any patient with suspected ENT manifestations of GERD before starting empiric therapy with acid-reducing medications since pathologic reflux by pH monitoring was confirmed in less than half of the patients with suspected GERD.

Keywords

Gastroesophageal reflux disease Globus Hoarseness Throat clearing Laryngoscopy Esophageal manometry Esophageal pH monitoring 

Notes

Author’s Contribution

FAMH: acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the article, final approval of the version to be published

CA: acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, final approval of the version to be published

YV: acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, final approval of the version to be published

MGP: conception and design, review for intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published

BRP: review for intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The study was approved by the IRB of each Institution. Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective format of the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Herbella FA, Dubecz A. Extraesophageal manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease. In. P. Marco Fisichella, Marco E. Allaix, Mario Morino, Marco G. Patti Editors. Esophageal Diseases. Evaluation and Treatment. Springer. 2014, pp 95–108Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hom C, Vaezi MF. Extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013;42(1):71–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Karkos PD, Benton J, Leong SC, Karkanevatos A, Badran K, Srinivasan VR, Temple RH, Issing WJ. Trends in laryngopharyngeal reflux: a British ENT survey. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;264(5):513–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahmed TF, Khandwala F, Abelson TI, Hicks DM, Richter JE, Milstein C, Vaezi MF. Chronic laryngitis associated with gastroesophageal reflux: prospective assessment of differences in practice patterns between gastroenterologists and ENT physicians. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(3):470–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bello B, Zoccali M, Gullo R, Allaix ME, Herbella FA, Gasparaitis A, Patti MG. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and antireflux surgery—what is the proper preoperative work-up? J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(1):14–20; discussion p. 20. doi:  10.1007/s11605-012-2057-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kleiman DA, Sporn MJ, Beninato T, Metz Y, Crawford C, Fahey TJ 3rd, Zarnegar R. Early referral for 24-h esophageal pH monitoring may prevent unnecessary treatment with acid-reducing medications. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(4):1302–9. doi:  10.1007/s00464-012-2602-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dobhan R, Castell DO. Normal and abnormal proximal esophageal acid exposure: results of ambulatory dual-probe pH monitoring. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:25–29.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Byrne PJ, Power C, Lawlor P, Ravi N, Reynolds JV. Laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dis Esophagus. 2006;19(5):377–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Neto SC, Herbella FA, Silva LC, Patti MG. Ratio between proximal/distal gastroesophageal reflux does not discriminate abnormal proximal reflux. World J Surg. 2014;38(4):890–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leone CA, Mosca F. Multicentric study: statistical correlation between clinical data and instrumental findings in laryngo-pharyngeal reflux: proposal for a new ENT classification of reflux. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2006;26(5):264–70.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Belafsky PC. Abnormal endoscopic pharyngeal and laryngeal findings attributable to reflux. Am J Med. 2003;115 Suppl 3A:90S-96S.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oelschlager BK, Eubanks TR, Maronian N, Hillel A, Oleynikov D, Pope CE, Pellegrini CA. Laryngoscopy and pharyngeal pH are complementary in the diagnosis of gastroesophageal-laryngeal reflux. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6(2):189–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hayat JO, Yazaki E, Moore AT, Hicklin L, Dettmar P, Kang JY, Sifrim D. Objective detection of esophagopharyngeal reflux in patients with hoarseness and endoscopic signs of laryngeal inflammation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48(4):318–27. doi:  10.1097/MCG.0000000000000011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Bortoli N, Nacci A, Savarino E, Martinucci I, Bellini M, Fattori B, Ceccarelli L, Costa F, Mumolo MG, Ricchiuti A, Savarino V, Berrettini S, Marchi S. How many cases of laryngopharyngeal reflux suspected by laryngoscopy are gastroesophageal reflux disease-related? World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(32):4363–70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Benati CD, Herbella FA, Patti MG. Manometric parameters in patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease and normal pH monitoring. GED gastroenterol. Endosc. Dig. 2014; 33(2):52–57.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shaker R. Protective mechanisms against supraesophageal GERD. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;30(3 Suppl):S3-8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Allaix ME, Fisichella PM, Noth I, Herbella FA, Borraez Segura B, Patti MG. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and gastroesophageal reflux. Implications for treatment. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(1):100–4; discussion 104–5. doi:  10.1007/s11605-013-2333-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Merati AL, Lim HJ, Ulualp SO, Toohill RJ. Meta-analysis of upper probe measurements in normal subjects and patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005;114(3):177–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Andersson O, Möller RY, Finizia C, Ruth M. A more than 10-year prospective, follow-up study of esophageal and pharyngeal acid exposure, symptoms and laryngeal findings in healthy, asymptomatic volunteers. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(1):23–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Becker V, Bajbouj M, Waller K, Schmid RM, Meining A. Clinical trial: persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms despite standard therapy with proton pump inhibitors—a follow-up study of intraluminal-impedance guided therapy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26(10):1355–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mazzoleni G, Vailati C, Lisma DG, Testoni PA, Passaretti S. Correlation between oropharyngeal pH-monitoring and esophageal pH-impedance monitoring in patients with suspected GERD-related extra-esophageal symptoms. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014;26(11):1557–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando A. M. Herbella
    • 1
  • Ciro Andolfi
    • 2
  • Yalini Vigneswaran
    • 2
  • Marco G. Patti
    • 2
  • Bruno R. Pinna
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Escola Paulista de MedicinaFederal University of Sao PauloSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Chicago Pritzker School of MedicineChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Escola Paulista de MedicinaFederal University of Sao PauloSão PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations