Advertisement

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 20, Issue 5, pp 879–884 | Cite as

White Paper: SSAT Commitment to Workforce Diversity and Healthcare Disparities

  • R. Matthew WalshEmail author
  • D. Rohan Jeyarajah
  • Jeffrey B. Matthews
  • Dana Telem
  • Mary T. Hawn
  • Fabrizio Michelassi
  • K. Marie Reid-Lomardo
SSAT White Paper

Abstract

The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Track (SSAT) is committed to diversity and inclusiveness of its membership, promotion of research related to healthcare disparities, cultural competency of practicing gastrointestinal surgeons, and cultivation of leaders with unique perspectives. The SSAT convened a task force to assess the current state of diversity and inclusion and recommend sustainable initiatives to promote these goals. Working through the current committee structure of the Society, and by establishing a permanent Diversity and Inclusion liaison committee, the SSAT will maintain its commitment and strive towards diversity of thought and inclusiveness on every level to improve the well-being and betterment of its membership and the patients they serve.

Keywords

Surgical workforce Workforce diversity Diversity Underserved populations Lesbian Gay Bisexual and transgender Minorities Cultural competence 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Ottersen OP, Dasgupta J, Blouin C et al. The Lancet-University of Oslo Commission on Global Governance for Health. The political origins of health inequity: prospects for change. Lancet, 383:630-67, 2014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Betancourt JR, Corbett J, Bondaryk BA. Addressing disparities and achieving equity. Chest, 145:143-148, 2014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Antonovsky A. Social class and the major cardiovascular diseases. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 21(2):65-106, 1968.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Byrd WM, Clayton LA. Race, medicine, and health care in the United States: a historical survey. Journal of the National Medical Association, 93(3 suppl):11S-34S, 2001.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bach PB, Cramer LD, Warren JL, Begg CB. Racial differences in the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. New England Journal of Medicine, 341(16):1198-205, 1999.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Riall TS, Townsend CM, Kuo YF, et al. Dissecting Racial Disparities in the Treatment of Patients with Locoregional Pancreatic Cancer: a 2-Step Process. Cancer. 116(4):930-9, 2010.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smedley, BD. Moving beyond access: achieving equity in state health care reform. Health Affairs, 27(2):447-55, 2008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feagin J, Bennefield Z. Systemic racism and U.S. health care. Social Science & Medicine, 103:7-14, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murphy MM, Simons JP, Ng SC, McDade TP, Smith JK, Shah SA, Zhou Z, Earle CC, Tseng JF. Racial differences in cancer specialist consultation, treatment, and outcomes for locoregional pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Annals of Surgery, 16(11):2968-77, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    When health care isn’t caring: Lambda Legal’s survey of discrimination against LGBT people and people with HIV. (New York: Lambda Legal 2010).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Betancourt JR. Cultural competence-marginal or mainstream movement? New England Journal of Medicine, 351(10):953-5, 2004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jhutti-Johal J. Understanding and coping with diversity in healthcare. Health Care Anal, 21:259-270, 2013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schyve PM. Language differences as a barrier to quality and safety in health care: the Joint Commission perspective. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22, Suppl 2:360-1, 2007.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jiang HJ, Andrews R, Stryer D, Friedman, B. Racial/ethnic disparities in potentially preventable readmissions: the case of diabetes. American Journal of Public Health, 95(9):1561-7, 2005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jha AK, Orav EJ, Zheng J, Epstein AM. The characteristics and performance of hospitals that care for elderly Hispanic Americans. Health Affairs, 27(2):528-37, 2008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Snipes SA, Sellers TL, Oduntami, A, Cooper LA, Fields JC, Vence L. Is race medically relevant? A qualitative study of physicians’ attitudes about the role of race in treatment decision-making. BMC Health Services Research, 11:183, 2011.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carter NM, Wagner HM. The bottom line: corporate performance and women’s representation on boards (2004-2008). Catalyst Inc. 2011.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herring C. Does diversity pay?: Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. American Sociological Review 2009;74:208-224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). Diversity in medical education: facts & figures 2012. AAMC 2012.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    French JC, O’Rourke C, Walsh RM. A Current Assessment of Diversity Characteristics and Perceptions of Their Importance in the Surgical Workforce. J Gastrointest Surg (2014) 18:1936-1943.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Elam CL, Johnson MM, Wiggs JS, Messmer JM, Brown PI, Hinkley R. Academic medicine, 76(1):60-5, 2001.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee KP, Kelz RR, Dubé B, Morris JB. Attitude and perceptions of the other underrepresented minority in surgery. J Surg Educ. 2014 Jun 25. pii: S1931-7204(14)00154-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.05.008.

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Matthew Walsh
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. Rohan Jeyarajah
    • 2
  • Jeffrey B. Matthews
    • 3
  • Dana Telem
    • 4
  • Mary T. Hawn
    • 5
  • Fabrizio Michelassi
    • 6
  • K. Marie Reid-Lomardo
    • 7
  1. 1.Cleveland ClinicClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Methodist HospitalDallasUSA
  3. 3.University of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  4. 4.Stony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA
  5. 5.Stanford UniversityPalo AltoUSA
  6. 6.Weill Cornell Medical CenterNew YorkUSA
  7. 7.Mayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations