Advertisement

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 19, Issue 9, pp 1621–1624 | Cite as

Impact of Nasojejunal Feeding on Outcome of Patients with Walled Off Pancreatic Necrosis (WOPN) Presenting with Pain: a Pilot Study

  • Surinder S Rana
  • Vinita Chaudhary
  • Ravi Sharma
  • Vishal Sharma
  • Puneet Chhabra
  • Deepak K BhasinEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Background

Drainage is usually recommended in symptomatic walled off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN). WOPN presenting with pain may get symptomatic relief if the pancreas is given rest by initiating nasojejunal (NJ) feed.

Aim

The aim of this was to prospectively study the efficacy of nasojejunal (NJ) feeding in patients of WOPN presenting with abdominal pain.

Methods

Twenty-one patients (15 M; 35 ± 12 years) with WOPN (size 7–16 cm) presenting with pain underwent NJ tube placement under endoscopic guidance. Following this, pain relief and long-term outcome were studied.

Results

Etiology of pancreatitis was alcohol in 12, gall stones in 6, and idiopathic in 3 patients. NJ tube was successfully placed in all patients and 17/21 (81 %) patients had symptomatic relief in 1–4 days (mean 2 ± 1 days) following NJ feeding. NJ tube was removed after 7–10 days (mean 7 ± 1 days), and 14 (61 %) patients remained pain free and follow-up imaging (1–8 months) revealed complete resolution or decrease in size of WOPN. Three patients had recurrence of pain and were successfully treated with endoscopic drainage.

Conclusions

NJ feeding improves pain in the majority of patients with WOPN and thus obviates or delays drainage. Majority of nonresponders had disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome (DPDS).

Keywords

Endoscopic ultrasound Pancreatic necrosis Alcohol Gall stones Acute pancreatitis 

Notes

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author’s Contribution

The authors contributed the following: Surinder S Rana: analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the article, and collection and assembly of data; Vinita Chaudhary: collection and assembly of data; Ravi K Sharma: collection and assembly of data; Vishal Sharma: collection and assembly of data; Puneet Chhabra: collection and assembly of data; and Deepak K Bhasin: analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the article, and critical revision of the article for important intellectual content.

References

  1. 1.
    Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS; Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013;62:102-111Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Rao C, Gupta R, Singh K. Non-fluoroscopic endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage of symptomatic non-bulging walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Dig Endosc 2013;25:47-52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gardner TB, Chahal P, Papachristou GI, Vege SS, Petersen BT, Gostout CJ, Topazian MD, Takahashi N, Sarr MG, Baron TH. A comparison of direct endoscopic necrosectomy with transmural endoscopic drainage for the treatment of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:1085-94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Seewald S, Groth S, Omar S, Imazu H, Seitz U, de Weerth A, Soetikno R, Zhong Y, Sriram PV, Ponnudurai R, Sikka S, Thonke F, Soehendra N. Aggressive endoscopic therapy for pancreatic necrosis and pancreatic abscess: A new safe and effective treatment algorithm (videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62:92-100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bang JY, Wilcox CM, Trevino J, Trevino JM, Ramesh J, Hasan M, Hawes RH, Varadarajulu S. Factors impacting treatment outcomes in the endoscopic management of walled-off pancreatic necrosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;28:1725-32PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Sharma RK, Kathiresan J, Gupta R. Do the morphological features of walled off pancreatic necrosis on endoscopic ultrasound determine the outcome of endoscopic transmural drainage? Endosc Ultrasound. 2014;3:118-22.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rana SS, Bhasin DK. Should All Fluid collections in Delayed Phase of Acute Necrotizing Pancreatitis Labeled as Walled off Pancreatic Necrosis? Dig Dis Sci 2014: 59: 1338-9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Reddy YR, Sharma V, Rao C, Sharma RK, Gupta R. Morphological features of fluid collections on endoscopic ultrasound in acute necrotizing pancreatitis: do they change over time? Ann Gastroenterol. 2014;27:258-261.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Werner J, Feuerbach S, Uhl W, Büchler MW. Management of acute pancreatitis: from surgery to interventional intensive care. Gut. 2005;54:426-36.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Easler J, Papachristou GI. The morphologic evolution of necrotic pancreatic fluid collections and their management. Asymptomatic: delay, defer and don’t panic! Ann Gastroenterol. 2014;27:191-192.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lordan JT, Phillips M, Chun JY, Worthington TR, Menezes NN, Lightwood R, Hussain F, Tibbs C, Karanjia ND. A safe, effective, and cheap method of achieving pancreatic rest in patients with chronic pancreatitis with refractory symptoms and malnutrition. Pancreas. 2009;38:689-92.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seminerio J, O’Keefe SJ. Jejunal feeding in patients with pancreatitis. Nutr Clin Pract. 2014;29:283-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Rao C, Sharma R, Gupta R. Consequences of long term indwelling transmural stents in patients with walled off pancreatic necrosis & disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome. Pancreatology. 2013;13:486-90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McClave SA, Snider H, Owens N, Sexton LK. Clinical nutrition in pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci. 1997;42:2035-44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Neoptolemos JP, London NJ, Carr-Locke DL. Assessment of main pancreatic duct integrity by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in patients with acute pancreatitis. Br J Surg 1993;80:94-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tann M, Maglinte D, Howard TH, et al. Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome: imaging findings and therapeutic implications in 26 surgically corrected patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2003;27:577-82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pelaez-Luna M, Vege SS, Petersen BT, et al. Disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome in severe acute pancreatitis: clinical and imaging characteristics and outcomes in a cohort of 31 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;68:91-7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marik PE, Zaloga GP: Gastric versus post-pyloric feeding: a systematic review. Crit Care 2003, 7:R46-51PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Surinder S Rana
    • 1
  • Vinita Chaudhary
    • 1
  • Ravi Sharma
    • 1
  • Vishal Sharma
    • 1
  • Puneet Chhabra
    • 1
  • Deepak K Bhasin
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of GastroenterologyPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Sector 12ChandigarhIndia
  2. 2.ChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations