Outcome for Asymptomatic Recurrence Following Laparoscopic Repair of Very Large Hiatus Hernia
Radiological follow-up following repair of large hiatus hernias have identified recurrence rates of 20–30 %, although most are small and asymptomatic. Whether patients will eventually develop clinical problems is uncertain. This study evaluated the outcome for individuals identified with an asymptomatic hiatus hernia following previous repair vs. asymptomatic controls.
One hundred fifteen asymptomatic patients who had previously undergone sutured repair of a large hiatus hernia and then underwent barium meal X-ray 6–60 months after surgery within a clinical trial were identified and divided into two cohorts: with (n = 41) vs. without (n = 74) an asymptomatic hernia. Heartburn, dysphagia, and satisfaction with surgery were assessed prospectively using a standardized questionnaire applying analogue scales. Consumption of antisecretory medication and revision surgery were also determined. To determine the natural history of asymptomatic recurrent hiatus hernia, outcomes for the two groups were compared at 1 and 5 years and at most recent (late) follow-up.
Outcomes were available at 1 year for 98.2 % and 5 years or the latest follow-up (range 6–237 months) for 100 %. Heartburn and dysphagia scores were low and satisfaction scores high in both groups at all follow-up points, but heartburn scores and medication use were higher in the recurrent hernia group. At late follow-up, 94.6 % of the recurrent hernia group vs. 98.5 % without a hernia regarded their original decision for surgery to be correct. Two patients in recurrent hernia group underwent revision surgery.
Patients with an initially asymptomatic recurrent hiatus hernia are more likely to report heartburn and use antisecretory medication at later follow-up than controls. However, overall clinical outcomes remain good, with high satisfaction and low surgical revision rates. Additional interventions to reduce the risk of recurrence might not be warranted.
KeywordsHiatus hernia Laparoscopic repair Barium meal X-ray
- 1.Dallemagne B, Weerts JM, Jehaes C, et al. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: preliminary report. Surgical Laparoscopy & Endoscopy 1991;1:138–43.Google Scholar
- 4.Cowgill SM, Gillman R, Kraemer E, et al. Ten-year follow up after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. AmSurg 2007;73:748–52.Google Scholar
- 6.Endzinas Z, Jonciauskiene J, Mickevicius A, Kiudelis M. Hiatal hernia recurrence after laparoscopic fundoplication. Medicina (Kaunas) 2007;43:27–31.Google Scholar
- 8.Smith GS, Isaacson JR, Draganic BD, et al. Symptomatic and radiological follow-up after para-esophageal hernia repair. DisEsoph 2004;17:279–84.Google Scholar
- 15.Stadlhuber RJ, Sherif A El, Mittal SK, et al. Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1219–26.Google Scholar
- 16.Orringer MB, Sloan H. Complications and failings of the combined Collis-Belsey operation. JThorCardiovascSurg 1977;74:726–35.Google Scholar
- 18.Watson DI, Thompson SK, Devitt PG, et al. Laparoscopic repair of very large hiatus hernia with sutures vs. absorbable vs. non-absorbable mesh—a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 2015;261:282–289.Google Scholar
- 19.Wijnhoven BPL, Watson DI. Laparoscopic repair of a giant hiatus hernia—how I do it. JGastrointestSurg : 2008;12:1459–64.Google Scholar
- 22.Whitson BA, Hoang CD, Boettcher AK, et al. Wedge gastroplasty and reinforced crural repair: important components of laparoscopic giant or recurrent hiatal hernia repair. J Thor Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:1196–1202.e3.Google Scholar