Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 19, Issue 4, pp 743–750 | Cite as

The Rise in Appendiceal Cancer Incidence: 2000–2009

  • Schelomo MarmorEmail author
  • Pamela R. Portschy
  • Todd M. Tuttle
  • Beth A. Virnig
Original Article



Appendiceal cancer is a rare and potentially aggressive malignancy. The objectives of this study were to characterize secular demographic patterns of disease and to determine survival by using a population-based data source.


Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of patients treated from 2000–2009.


We identified 4765 patients with appendiceal cancer. The incidence of appendiceal cancer increased by 54 % from 2000 (0.63 per 100,000) to 2009 (0.97 per 100,000 population). Incidence rates increased across all tumor types, stages, age groups, and gender. The most common malignancies were mucinous adenocarcinoma (38 %), followed by carcinoids (28 %), adenocarcinoma-not otherwise specified (NOS) (27 %), and signet ring cell adenocarcinoma (7 %). Larger tumor size and older patient age were significantly associated with higher relative odds of distant disease at diagnosis (P < 0.0001). Patient and demographic characteristics were significantly associated with higher relative hazard of death (P < 0.0001).


Although appendiceal cancer is rare, the incidence increased significantly in the USA from 2000 to 2009. The cause of this trend is not obvious. We did not observe increases differentially associated with stage, histology, or demographic characteristics. Further investigation is needed to examine factors underlying this increase.


Appendiceal Cancer SEER program Survival 


Funding for this study

This research was generously supported by the Betti Boers Maloney Appendiceal Cancer Research Fund at the University of Minnesota Foundation

Conflicts of interest

No financial disclosures/conflicts of interest.


  1. 1.
    McCusker, M. E., Coté, T. R., Clegg, L. X., & Sobin, L. H. (2002). Primary malignant neoplasms of the appendix. Cancer, 94(12), 3307–3312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    McGory, M. L., Maggard, M. A., Kang, H., O’Connell, J. B., & Ko, C. Y. (2005). Malignancies of the appendix: beyond case series reports. Diseases of the colon & rectum, 48(12), 2264–2271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Modlin, I. M., Lye, K. D., & Kidd, M. (2003). A 5‐decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer, 97(4), 934–959.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Modlin, I. M., & Sandor, A. (2000). An analysis of 8305 cases of carcinoid tumors. Cancer, 79(4), 813–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kocher, K. E., Meurer, W. J., Fazel, R., Scott, P. A., Krumholz, H. M., & Nallamothu, B. K. (2011). National trends in use of computed tomography in the emergency department. Annals of emergency medicine, 58(5), 452–462.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Surveillance. Epidemiology, and End Results. Available at: Accessed April 10, 2013.
  7. 7.
    Misdraji, J., Yantiss, R. K., Graeme-Cook, F. M., Balis, U. J., & Young, R. H. (2003). Appendix mucinous neoplasms: a clinicopathologic analysis of 107 cases. The American journal of surgical pathology, 27(8), 1089–1103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Phillips, K. A., Liang, S. Y., Ladabaum, U., Haas, J., Kerlikowske, K., Lieberman, D., … & Van Bebber, S. L. (2007). Trends in colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. Medical care, 45(2), 160–167.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Trivedi, A. N., Levine, E. A., & Mishra, G. (2009). Adenocarcinoma of the appendix is rarely detected by colonoscopy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 13(4), 668–675.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Levine, E. A., Blazer III, D. G., Kim, M. K., Shen, P., Stewart IV, J. H., Guy, C., & Hsu, D. S. (2012). Gene expression profiling of peritoneal metastases from appendiceal and colon cancer demonstrates unique biologic signatures and predicts patient outcomes. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 214(4), 599–606.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    American Cancer Society. Available at: Accessed May 5, 2014.
  12. 12.
    Sitzmann, J. V., & Wiebke, E. A. (2013). Risk-Reducing Appendectomy and the Elimination of BRCA1-Associated Intraperitoneal Cancer. JAMA surgery, 148(3), 285–291.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maggard, M. A., O'Connell, J. B., & Ko, C. Y. (2004). Updated population-based review of carcinoid tumors. Annals of surgery, 240(1), 117.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kulke, M. H., & Mayer, R. J. (1999). Carcinoid tumors. New England Journal of Medicine, 340(11), 858–868.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Groth, S. S., Virnig, B. A., Al‐Refaie, W. B., Jarosek, S. L., Jensen, E. H., & Tuttle, T. M. (2011). Appendix carcinoid tumors: predictors of lymph node metastasis and the impact of right hemicolectomy on survival. Journal of surgical oncology, 103(1), 39–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andreyev, H. J. N., Norman, A. R., Oates, J., & Cunningham, D. (1998). Why do patients with weight loss have a worse outcome when undergoing chemotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies?. European Journal of Cancer,34(4), 503–509.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gouma, D. J., Van Geenen, R. C., van Gulik, T. M., de Haan, R. J., de Wit, L. T., Busch, O. R., & Obertop, H. (2000). Rates of complications and death after pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors and the impact of hospital volume.Annals of surgery, 232(6), 786.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gordon, T. A., Bowman, H. M., Bass, E. B., Lillemoe, K. D., Yeo, C. J., Heitmiller, R. F., … & Cameron, J. L. (1999). Complex gastrointestinal surgery: impact of provider experience on clinical and economic outcomes. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 189(1), 46–56.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Schelomo Marmor
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pamela R. Portschy
    • 1
  • Todd M. Tuttle
    • 1
  • Beth A. Virnig
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, School of MedicineUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Division of Health Policy & Management, School of Public HealthUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations