Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 65–71 | Cite as

Perioperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Predict Serious Postoperative Complications: a Secondary Analysis of the COST Trial

  • Juliane Bingener
  • Jeff A. Sloan
  • Paul J. Novotny
  • Barbara A. Pockaj
  • Heidi Nelson
2014 SSAT Plenary Presentation

Abstract

Background

Decreased survival after colon cancer surgery has been reported in patients with deficient preoperative quality of life. We hypothesized that deficits in preoperative quality of life are associated with postoperative complications.

Patient and Methods

A secondary analysis of the Clinical Outcomes Surgical Therapy trial NCCTG 93-46-53 (INT 0146, Alliance) was performed. Quality of life deficit was defined as overall quality of life score <50 on a 100-point scale and used for univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results

Of 431 patients enrolled in the quality of life portion of the trial, 81 patients (19 %) experienced complications including two deaths (0.5 %). Fifty-five patients (13 %) had a preoperative quality of life score <50. Patients with a preoperative deficit were more likely to have a serious early complication (16 vs 6 %, p = 0.023). Using stepwise logistic model, the variables significantly associated with having any early complications (yes/no) were age, ASA III and change in “activity” from baseline to day 14. Patients with an early complication experienced a 3.5-day longer hospital stay (p = 0.0001). Gender, race, tumor stage, and laparoscopic or open approach were not associated with an increased frequency of complications. After adjusting for demographics, tumor stage, ASA, and operative approach, significant predictors for readmission were preoperative pain (odds ratio (OR) 1.61, confidence interval (CI) 1.11–2.34, p = 0.0125), and changes from baseline to day 2 in fatigue (OR 1.34, CI 1.03–1.74, p = 0.032).

Conclusions

This study suggests that quality of life can provide an early indicator for patients at risk of complications. Further studies should evaluate how perioperative quality of life assessment may assist to improve outcomes.

Keywords

Quality of life Outcomes Surgery Complication Colon cancer 

Notes

Funding

Research reported in this manuscript was supported by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases of the National Institutes of Health under award number K23DK93553 and to the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (Monica M. Bertagnolli, M.D., Chair, CA31946), to the Alliance Statistics and Data Center (Daniel J. Sargent, Ph.D., CA33601) and the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) CA149950-03. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health or the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG). Original funding of the Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy trial 93-46-53 was provided by the National Cancer Institute in association with the North Central Cancer Treatment Group.

References

  1. 1.
    Sloan JA, Zhao X, Novotny PJ, Wampfler J, Garces Y, Clark MM, Yang P. Relationship between deficits in overall quality of life and non-small-cell lung cancer survival. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 2012;30(13): 1498-1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Velanovich V. The association of quality-of-life measures with malignancy and survival in patients with pancreatic pathology. Pancreas 2011;40(7): 1063-1069.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW, Jr., Hellinger M, Flanagan R, Jr., Peters W, Nelson H. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 2007;246(4): 655-662; discussion 662-654.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, Sargent D, Schroeder G. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 2002;287(3): 321-328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stucky CC, Pockaj BA, Novotny PJ, Sloan JA, Sargent DJ, O’Connell MJ, Beart RW, Skibber JM, Nelson H, Weeks JC. Long-term follow-up and individual item analysis of quality of life assessments related to laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in the COST trial 93-46-53 (INT 0146). Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18(9): 2422-2431.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCorkle R, Quint-Benoliel J. Symptom distress, current concerns and mood disturbance after diagnosis of life-threatening disease. Soc Sci Med 1983;17(7): 431-438.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tsevat J, Dawson NV, Matchar DB. Assessing quality of life and preferences in the seriously ill using utility theory. Journal of clinical epidemiology 1990;43 Suppl: 73S-77S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mathis KL, Green EM, Sargent DJ, Delaney C, Simmang CL, Nelson H. Surgical quality surrogates do not predict colon cancer survival in the setting of technical credentialing: a report from the prospective COST trial. Ann Surg 2013;257(1): 102-107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Englesbe MJ, Terjimanian MN, Lee JS, Sheetz KH, Harbaugh CM, Hussain A, Holcombe SA, Sullivan J, Campbell DA, Jr., Wang SC, Sonnenday CJ. Morphometric age and surgical risk. J Am Coll Surg 2013;216(5): 976-985.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Englesbe MJ, Lee JS, He K, Fan L, Schaubel DE, Sheetz KH, Harbaugh CM, Holcombe SA, Campbell DA, Jr., Sonnenday CJ, Wang SC. Analytic morphomics, core muscle size, and surgical outcomes. Ann Surg 2012;256(2): 255-261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li C, Carli F, Lee L, Charlebois P, Stein B, Liberman AS, Kaneva P, Augustin B, Wongyingsinn M, Gamsa A, Kim do J, Vassiliou MC, Feldman LS. Impact of a trimodal prehabilitation program on functional recovery after colorectal cancer surgery: a pilot study. Surgical endoscopy 2013;27(4): 1072-1082.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mayo NE, Feldman L, Scott S, Zavorsky G, Kim do J, Charlebois P, Stein B, Carli F. Impact of preoperative change in physical function on postoperative recovery: argument supporting prehabilitation for colorectal surgery. Surgery 2011;150(3): 505-514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juliane Bingener
    • 1
  • Jeff A. Sloan
    • 2
  • Paul J. Novotny
    • 2
  • Barbara A. Pockaj
    • 3
  • Heidi Nelson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  2. 2.Alliance Statistics and Data CenterMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryMayo ClinicScottsdaleUSA

Personalised recommendations