Advertisement

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 18, Issue 11, pp 1902–1910 | Cite as

Low Drain Fluid Amylase Predicts Absence of Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreatectomy

  • Christina W. Lee
  • Henry A. Pitt
  • Taylor S. Riall
  • Sean S. Ronnekleiv-Kelly
  • Jacqueline S. Israel
  • Glen E. Leverson
  • Abhishek D. Parmar
  • E. Molly Kilbane
  • Bruce L. Hall
  • Sharon M. WeberEmail author
2014 SSAT Quick Shot Presentation

Abstract

Introduction

Improvements in the ability to predict pancreatic fistula could enhance patient outcomes. Previous studies demonstrate that drain fluid amylase on postoperative day 1 (DFA1) is predictive of pancreatic fistula. We sought to assess the accuracy of DFA1 and to identify a reliable DFA1 threshold under which pancreatic fistula is ruled out.

Methods

Patients undergoing pancreatic resection from November 1, 2011 to December 31, 2012 were selected from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pancreatectomy Demonstration Project database. Pancreatic fistula was defined as drainage of amylase-rich fluid with drain continuation >7 days, percutaneous drainage, or reoperation for a pancreatic fluid collection. Univariate and multi-variable regression models were utilized to identify factors predictive of pancreatic fistula.

Results

DFA1 was recorded in 536 of 2,805 patients who underwent pancreatic resection, including pancreaticoduodenectomy (n = 380), distal pancreatectomy (n = 140), and enucleation (n = 16). Pancreatic fistula occurred in 92/536 (17.2 %) patients. DFA1, increased body mass index, small pancreatic duct size, and soft texture were associated with fistula (p < 0.05). A DFA1 cutoff value of <90 U/L demonstrated the highest negative predictive value of 98.2 %. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve confirmed the predictive relationship of DFA1 and pancreatic fistula.

Conclusion

Low DFA1 predicts the absence of a pancreatic fistula. In patients with DFA1 < 90 U/L, early drain removal is advisable.

Keywords

Pancreatectomy Drain fluid amylase Pancreatic fistula American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Surgical Clinical Reviewers, Surgeon Champions, and pancreatic surgeons who participated in the Pancreatectomy Demonstration Project at the institutions listed below. We also wish to thank the leadership of the American College of Surgeons and of ACS-NSQIP for the opportunity to conduct the demonstration project.

• Albany Medical Center

• Ohio State University

• Baptist Memphis

• Oregon Health Sciences Center

• Baylor University

• Penn State University

• Baystate Medical Center

• Providence Portland

• Beth Israel Deaconess

• Sacred Heart

• Boston Medical Center

• Stanford University

• Brigham & Women’s Hospital

• Tampa General

• California Pacific Medical Center

• Thomas Jefferson University

• Cleveland Clinic

• University Alabama

• Emory University

• University of California Irvine

• Hospital University Pennsylvania

• University of California San Diego

• Intermountain

• University Iowa

• Indiana University

• University Kentucky

• Indiana University Methodist

• University Minnesota

• Johns Hopkins

• University Texas Medical Branch

• Kaiser Permanente San Francisco

• University Virginia

• Kaiser Walnut

• University Wisconsin

• Leigh Valley

• Vanderbilt University

• Massachusetts General

• Wake Forest University

• Mayo-Methodist

• Washington University St. Louis

• Mayo-St Mary’s

• Winthrop University

• Northwestern University

 

Conflict of Interest

BLH is a paid consultant to the ACS as Associate Director for the ACS-NSQIP.

References

  1. 1.
    Bassi C, Molinari E, Malleo G, Crippa S, Butturini G, Salvia R, Talamini, Pederzoli P. Early versus late drain removal after standard pancreatic resections: results of a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 2010;252(2):207-14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moskovic DJ, Hodges SE, Wu M, Brunicardi FC, Hilsenbeck SG, Fisher WE. Drain data to predict clinically relevant pancreatic fistula. HPB 2010;12:472-481.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DeOliveira ML, Winter JM, Schafer M, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ, Clavien PA. Assessment of complications after pancreatic surgery. Ann Surg 2006;244:931-9.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an International Study Group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005;138(1):8-13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kawai M, Tani M, Terasawa H, Ina S, Hirono S. Early removal of prophylactic drains reduces the risk of intra-abdominal infections in patients with pancreatic head resection; prospective study for 104 consecutive patients. Ann Surg. 2006; 244:1-7.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Molinari E, Bassi C, Salvia R, Butturini G, Crippa S, Talamini G, Falconi M, Pederzoli P. Amylase value in drains after pancreatic resection as predictive factor of postoperative pancreatic fistula. Ann Surg 2007;246(2):281-7.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shinchi H, Wada K, Traverso L. The usefulness of drain data to identify a clinically relevant pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy? J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:490-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sutcliffe RP, Battula N, Haque A, Ali A, Srinivasan P, Atkinson S, Rela M, Heaton N, Prachalias A. Utility of drain fluid amylase measurement on the first postoperative day after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 2012; 36(4):879-83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kawai M, Kondo S, Yamaue H, Wada K, Sano K, Motoi F, Unno M, Satoi S, Kwon A, Hatori T, Yamamoto M, Matsumoto J, Murakami Y, Doi R, Ito M, Miyakawa S, Shinchi H, Natsugoe S, Nakagawara H, Ohta T, Takada T. Predictive risk factors for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula analyzed in 1,239 patients with pancreaticoduodenectomy: multicenter data collection as a project study of pancreatic surgery by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011;18(4):601-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Israel JS, Rettammel RJ, Leverson GE, Hanks LR, Cho CS, Winslow ER, Weber SM. Does postoperative drain amylase predict pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy? J Am Coll Surg. 2014 May; 218(5):978-87.pii: S1072-7515(14)00134-3. doi:  10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.01.048. E pub Feb 18
  11. 11.
    Nissen NN, Menon VG, Puri V, Annamalai A, Boland B. A simple algorithm for drain management after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Am Surg 2012;78(10):1143-6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    American College of Surgeons. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: American College of Surgeons; 2013 available at http://site.acsnsqip.org/downloads/
  13. 13.
    American College of Surgeons. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: Participation User Guide 2013 available a http://site.acsnsqip.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/ACSNSQIP.PUF_.UserGuide.2012.pdf
  14. 14.
    Parikh P, Shiloach M, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY, Hall BL, Pitt HA. Pancreatectomy risk calculator: an ACS-NSQIP resource. HPB. 2010 12:488-497.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sato N, Yamaguchi K, Chijiwa K, Tanaka Masao. Risk analysis of pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Arch Surg. 1998;133:1094-1098.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin JW, Cameron JL, Yeo CJ et al. Risk factors and outcomes in postpancreaticoduodenectomy pancreaticocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointestinal Surg. 2004;8:951-959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    El Nakeeb A, Salah T, Sultan A, El Hemaly M, Askr W, Ezzat H, Hamdy E, Atef E, El Hanafy E, El-Geidie A, Wahab M, Abdallah T. Pancreatic anastomotic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Risk factors, clinical predictors, and management (single center experience). World J Surg 2013 Mar 15 [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heslin MJ, Harrison LE. Brooks AD, Hochwald SN, Coit DG, Brennan MF. Is intra-abdominal drainage necessary after pancreaticoduodenectomy? J Gastrointest Surg 1998;2:373-378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kelly KJ, Greenblatt DY, Wan Y, Rettamel RJ, Winslow E, Cho CS, Weber SM. Risk stratification for distal pancreatectomy utilizing ACS-NSQIP: preoperative factors predict morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 2011;15:250-261.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Greenblatt DY, Kelly KJ, Rajamanickam V, Wan Y, Handon T, Rettamel R, Winslow ER, Cho CS, Weber SM. Preoperative factors predict perioperative morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:2126-2135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pratt WB, Callery MP, Vollmer CM Jr. Risk prediction for development of pancreatic fistula using the ISGPF classification scheme. World J Surg. 2008;32:419-28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Conlon KC, Labow D, Leung D, Smith A, Jarnagin W, Colt D, Merchant N, Brennan M. Prospective randomized clinical trial of the value of intraperitoneal drainage after pancreatic resection. Ann Surg2001;234:487-93.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Correa-Gallego C, Brennan MF, D’Angelica M, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, Kingham P, Jarnagin WR, Allen PJ. Operative drainage following pancreatic resection analysis of 1122 patients resected over 5 years at a single institution. Ann Surg 2013; 258(6):1051-8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Van Buren G, Bloomston M, Hughes SJ, Winter J, Behrman SW, Zyromski NJ, Vollmer C, Velanovich V, Riall T, Muscarella P, Trevino J, Nakeeb A, Schmidt CM, Behrns K, Ellison C, Barakat O, Perry KA, Drebin J, House M, Abdel-Misih S, Silberfein EJ, Goldin S, Brown K, Mohammed S, Hodges SE, McElhany A, Issazadeh M, Jo E, Qianxing M, Fisher WE. A randomized prospective multicenter trial of pancreaticoduodenectomy with and without routine intraperitoneal drainage. Ann Surg. 2014;259(4):605-610.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christina W. Lee
    • 1
  • Henry A. Pitt
    • 2
  • Taylor S. Riall
    • 3
  • Sean S. Ronnekleiv-Kelly
    • 1
  • Jacqueline S. Israel
    • 1
  • Glen E. Leverson
    • 1
  • Abhishek D. Parmar
    • 3
  • E. Molly Kilbane
    • 4
  • Bruce L. Hall
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
    • 8
  • Sharon M. Weber
    • 9
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryTemple University School of MedicinePhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Texas Medical BranchGalvestonUSA
  4. 4.Indiana University HealthIndianapolisUSA
  5. 5.Department of Surgery, School of MedicineWashington University in St. Louis and Barnes Jewish HospitalSt. LouisUSA
  6. 6.Department of SurgeryJohn Cochran Affairs Medical CenterSt. LouisUSA
  7. 7.Olin Business School and the Center for Health PolicyWashington University in St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  8. 8.BJC HealthcareSt. LouisUSA
  9. 9.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public HealthMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations