Evolution of Standardized Clinical Pathways: Refining Multidisciplinary Care and Process to Improve Outcomes of the Surgical Treatment of Esophageal Cancer
- 944 Downloads
The aim of this study is to determine the effect of the implementation and evolution of a multidisciplinary esophagectomy care pathway on postoperative outcomes over a 20-year experience.
All patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer between 1991 and 2012 were included. Patients were divided into four groups (Gp1 1991–1996, Gp2 1997–2002, Gp3 2003–2007, and Gp4 2008–2012).
Five hundred and ninety-five patients were included (Gp1 92, Gp2 159, Gp3 161, and Gp4 183). Age remained consistent over time; however, a progressive significant increase was observed in BMI and Charlson comorbidity index. Increases were also noted in patients with clinical stage III cancers, in the use of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, in salvage esophagectomy and in the utilization of pretreatment jejunostomy. We observed a significant reduction in estimated blood loss (EBL) and operative room IV fluid administration (ORFA) during the study period. Median ICU stay and length of hospital stay (LOS) (10 (5–50) to 8 (5–115) days) decreased over time. In-hospital mortality (0.3 %) and postoperative complications remained consistent over time. cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis showed that EBL, ORFA, and LOS all declined during the study period, reaching mean values at case 120, 310, and 175, respectively.
The results of this study show that process improvement within the pathway is likely more significant than the level of comorbidities, application of neoadjuvant chemoradiation, or technical approach in patients undergoing esophagectomy.
KeywordsEsophageal cancer Esophagectomy Enhanced recovery
Conflict of Interest
- 2.Simard EP, Ward EM, Siegel R, Jemal A. Cancers with increasing incidence trends in the United States: 1999 through 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2012 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
- 13.Omloo JM, Lagarde SM, Hulscher JB, Reitsma JB, Fockens P, van Dekken H, Ten Kate FJ, Obertop H, Tilanus HW, van Lanschot JJ. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus: five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg 2007; 246: 992–1000PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Liberman AS, Soon M, Hill A, Kennefy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society. Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society recommendations. World J Surg 2013; 37(2):259–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Rotter T, Kinsman L, James E, Machotta A, Gothe H, Willis J, Snow P, Kugler J. Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Cochrane database Syst Rev 2010 17; (3): CD006632.Google Scholar
- 27.Low DE, Kunz S, Schembre D, Otero H, Malpass T, Hsi A, Song G, Hinke R, Kozarek RA. Esophagectomy–it’s not just about mortality anymore: standardized perioperative clinical pathways improve outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 2007, 11: 1395–1402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Wright CD, Kucharczuk JC, O’Brien SM, Grab JD, Allen MS; Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database. Predictors of major morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database risk adjustment model. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 137: 587–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.National Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Annual report 2004. http://www.augis.org/pdf/audits/2004_AUGIS_O_G_audit.pdf