Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 1100–1107 | Cite as

Intraoperative Pancreatoscopy: A Valuable Tool for Pancreatic Surgeons?

  • Michael J. Pucci
  • Caitlyn M. Johnson
  • Viren P. Punja
  • Ali A. Siddiqui
  • Kelly Lopez
  • Jordan M. Winter
  • Harish Lavu
  • Charles J. YeoEmail author
Original Article


Effective treatment of pancreatic pathology relies on both preoperative and intraoperative decision making. Traditionally, the use of preoperative imaging and endoscopic modalities, in combination with intraoperative findings and pathologic evaluation, has guided the surgeons to perform the correct operative procedure. We hypothesize that the intraoperative use of pancreatoscopy (fiberoptic endoscopy of the pancreatic duct) is a valuable adjunct in selected cases to facilitate the performance of the appropriate definitive surgical treatment. We queried our IRB-approved, prospectively maintained the pancreatic surgery database identifying the uses of intraoperative pancreatoscopy in all pancreatic resections at our institution from 2005–2012. Operative notes, pathology reports, and perioperative outcomes were evaluated. During the study period, 1,016 pancreatic resections were performed at our institution. Twenty-three cases during this period included the use of intraoperative pancreatoscopy. Eighteen (78 %) of these operations were performed for presumed main duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. In five cases (22 %), the surgical resection was extended secondary to the intraoperative pancreatoscopy findings. Appropriate surgical treatment of the pancreatic lesions can be challenging in the face of preoperative imaging limitations. The selective use of intraoperative fiberoptic endoscopy to evaluate the pancreatic duct appears to help to enable the surgeon to better perform the appropriate resection and optimal treatment.


Pancreatic Cancer IPMN Pancreatoscopy Pancreatic Resections 



The authors would like to thank Jennifer Brumbaugh, MA for the superb illustrations included in this manuscript. Additionally, we would like to thank the operative room staff at the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital for their tireless work at helping us to provide the highest level of care for our mutual patients.

Conflicts of Interest and Source of Funding

The authors have no conflicts of interest or sources of funding to declare.


  1. 1.
    Vikram R, Balachandran A. Imaging in staging and management of pancreatic ductal ddenocarcinoma. Indian J Sur Oncol 2011;2(2):78–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yeo CJ. Please join us in this honorable quest. Cancer J 18:475–476, 2012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Soriano A, Castells A, Ayuso C, et al. Preoperative staging and tumor resectability assessment of pancreatic cancer: prospective study comparing endoscopic ultrasonography, helical computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 492–501Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yeo CJ, Abrams RA, Grochow LB, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation improves survival. A prospective, single-institution experience. Ann Surg 1997; 225(5): 621–636PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Winter JM. Yeo CJ, Brody JR. Diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers in pancreatic cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107(1):15–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salvia R, Fernandez-del Castillo C, Bassi C, et al. Main-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: Clinical predictors of malignancy and long-term survival following resection. Ann Surg 2004; 239(5): 678–687PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schmidt CM, White PB, Water JA, et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: Predictors of malignant and invasive pathology. Ann Surg 2007; 246(4): 644–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rodriguez JR, Salvia R, Crippa S, et al. Branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: observations in 145 patients who underwent resection. Gastroenterology 2007; 133(1): 72–79PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tajiri H, Kobayashi M, Ohtsu A, et al. Peroral pancreatoscopy for the diagnosis of pancreatic disease. Pancreas 1998; 16(3): 408–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nagayoshi Y, Aso T, Ohtsuka T, et al. Peroral pancreatoscopy using SpyGlass system for the assessment of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2013; Oct 14 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaneko T, Nakao A, Nomoto S, et al. Intraoperative pancreatoscopy with the ultrathin pancreatoscope for mucin-producing tumors of the pancreas. Arch Surg 1998;133:263–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yamataka A, Segawa O, Kobayashi H, et al. Intraoperative pancreatoscopy for pancreatic duct stone debris distal to the common channel in choledochal cyst. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35(1):1–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yelamali A, Mansard MJ, Dama R, et al. Intraoperative pancreatoscopy with narrow band imaging: a novel method for assessment of resection margins in a case of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm. Surg Endosc 2012; 26(12):3682–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khalid A. Differentiating neoplastic from benign lesions of the pancreas: Translational techniques. Clin Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2009; 7(11): 55–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lavu H and Yeo CJ. Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without pylorus preservation. In Lillemoe KD and Jarnagin WR (eds), Master Techniques in General Surgery: Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery; Phila: Wolters Kluwer-Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2013, pp 13–30.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kennedy EP, Brumbaugh JP and Yeo CJ. Reconstruction following the pylorus preserving Whipple resection: PJ, HJ and DJ. J Gastrointest Surg 2010, 14:408–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kennedy EP, Rosato EL, Sauter PK et al. Initiation of a critical pathway for pancreaticoduodenectomy at an academic institution—the first step in multi-disciplinary team building. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204:917–924.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael J. Pucci
    • 2
  • Caitlyn M. Johnson
    • 2
  • Viren P. Punja
    • 2
  • Ali A. Siddiqui
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kelly Lopez
    • 2
  • Jordan M. Winter
    • 2
  • Harish Lavu
    • 2
  • Charles J. Yeo
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Departments of Surgery and GastroenterologyThomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.The Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer CenterThomas Jefferson UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations