Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 947–951 | Cite as

Single-Stage vs. Two-Stage Management for Concomitant Gallstones and Common Bile Duct stones: A Prospective Randomized Trial with Long-Term Follow-up

Original Article

Abstract

Aim

The preferred approach to the management of common bile duct (CBD) stones is uncertain, with single-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy and CBD exploration vs. two-stage preoperative endoscopic CBD clearance followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy being debated. To address this, a prospective randomized study which compared these two management strategies was undertaken.

Methods

Between Jan 2002 and Dec 2005, patients with gallstones and common bile duct stones diagnosed by preoperative ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography were randomized to single-stage vs. two-stage treatment. In a single-stage group, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and CBD exploration were undertaken at the same operation, whereas in a two-stage group, endoscopic stone clearance was followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy 2–5 days later. Early treatment success and complications and longer-term follow-up for the two groups were compared.

Results

Two hundred twenty-one patients were enrolled in the trial, 110 in the single-stage group and 111 in the two-stage group. There was no significant difference in the success rate of CBD clearance (93.6 vs. 94.6 %, p = 0.76) or the complication rates (3.6 vs. 5.1 %, p = 0.527) between the groups. However, at longer-term follow-up, recurrent CBD stones were seen more often in the two-stage group (9.5 vs. 2.1 %, p = 0.037).

Conclusion

The single-stage and two-stage approaches were equally effective in achieving initial clearance of CBD stones. However, recurrent CBD stones occurred more commonly in patients who had undergone two-stage treatment with initial endoscopic stone clearance, followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Keywords

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration Endoscopic sphincterotomy Gallstones Common bile duct stones 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Professor David Watson for language editing

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

  1. 1.
    Collins C, Maguire D, Ireland A, et al. A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited. Ann Surg, 2004; 239: 28-33PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hemli JM, Arnot RS, Ashworth JJ, et al. Feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in a rural centre. ANZ J Surg 2004; 74: 979-982CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Petelin JB. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1705-1715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bin Wang, Zhenying Guo, Zhenjie Liu et al. Preoperative versus intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in patients with gallbladder and suspected common bile duct stones: system review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2013, Jan 26Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rogers SJ, Cello JP, Horn JK, et al. Prospective randomized trial of LC+LCBDE vs ERCP/S+LC for common bile duct stone disease. Arch Surg, 2010; 145: 28-33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wright BE, Freeman ML, Cumming JK, et al. Current management of common bile duct stones: is there a role for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography as a single-stage procedure? Surgery, 2002; 132: 729-35CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poulose BK, Speroff T, Holzman MD. Optimizing choledocholithiasis management: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Surg, 2007; 142(1): 43-48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rojas-Ortega S, Arizpe-Bravo D, Marín López ER, et al. Transcystic common bile duct exploration in the management of patients with cho-ledocholithiasis. J Gastrointest Surg, 2003; 492-496Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tinoco R, Tinoco A, El-Kadre L, et al. Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. Ann Surg 2008; 247 : 674-679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Virinder K. Bansal Mahesh C. Misra Pramod Garg et al, A prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage versus single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and common bile duct stones, Surg Endosc, 2010, 24:1986–1989CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yin Z, Xu K, Sun J, Is the end of the T-tube drainage era in laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones is coming? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2013 Jan; 257(1):54-66.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jiong Lu, Yao Cheng, Xian-Ze Xiong Two-stage vs single-stage management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones World J Gastroenterol,2012; 18(24): 3156-3166PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Buxbaum J. Modern management of common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2013; 23(2):251-75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guru Trikudanathan, Udayakumar Navaneethan, Mansour A Parsi, Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct Stones, World J Gastroenterol,2013; 19(2): 165-173Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang P, Li ZS, Liu F, et al. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 31-40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol, 2007; 102: 1781-1788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Suissa A, Yassin K, Lavy A, et al. Outcome and early complications of ERCP: a prospective single center study. Hepatogastroenterology 2005; 52: 352-355PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sand J, Airo I, Hiltunen KM, et al. Changes in biliary bacteria after endoscopic cholangiography and sphincterotomy. Am Surg 1992; 58: 324-328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tranter SE, Thompson MH. Comparison of endoscopic sphincterotomy and laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct. Br J Surg, 2002; 89: 1495-1504CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tianjin Medical UniversityTianjinChina
  2. 2.Minimally Invasive Surgery CenterTianjin Nankai HospitalTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations