Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 464–475 | Cite as

Postpancreatectomy Hemorrhage—Incidence, Treatment, and Risk Factors in Over 1,000 Pancreatic Resections

  • U. F. Wellner
  • B. Kulemann
  • H. Lapshyn
  • J. Hoeppner
  • O. Sick
  • F. Makowiec
  • D. Bausch
  • Ulrich Theodor HoptEmail author
  • T. Keck
2013 SSAT Poster Presentation



Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage is a rare but often severe complication after pancreatic resection. The aim of this retrospective study was to define incidence and risk factors of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage and to evaluate treatment options and outcome.

Patients and Methods

Clinical data was extracted from a prospectively maintained database. Descriptive statistics, univariate and multivariate risk factor analysis by binary logistic regression were performed with SPSS software at a significance level of p = 0.05.


N = 1,082 patients with pancreatic resections between 1994 and 2012 were included. Interventional angiography was successful in about half of extraluminal bleeding. A total of 78 patients (7.2 %) had postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), and 29 (2.7 %) were grade C PPH. Multivariate modeling disclosed a learning effect, age, BMI, male sex, intraoperative transfusion, portal venous and multivisceral resection, pancreatic fistula and preoperative biliary drainage as independent predictors of severe postpancreatectomy hemorrhage. High-risk histopathology, age, transfusion, pancreatic fistula, postpancreatectomy hemorrhage and pancreatojejunostomy in pancreatoduodenectomies were independent predictors of mortality.


Our study identifies clinically relevant risk factors for postpancreatectomy hemorrhage and mortality. Interventional treatment of extraluminal hemorrhage is successful in about half of the cases and if unsuccessful constitutes a valuable adjunct to operative hemostasis. Based on our observations, we propose a treatment scheme for PPH. Risk factor analysis suggests appropriate patient selection especially for extended resections and pancreatogastrostomy for reconstruction in pancreatoduodenectomy.


Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage Pancreatic surgery Pancreatic resection Postoperative pancreatic fistula Risk factors 


  1. 1.
    Correa-Gallego C, Brennan MF, D'Angelica MI, Dematteo RP, Fong Y, Kingham TP, Jarnagin WR, Allen PJ: Contemporary experience with postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: results of 1,122 patients resected between 2006 and 2011. J Am Coll Surg 2012.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Darnis B, Lebeau R, Chopin-Laly X, Adham M: Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): predictors and management from a prospective database. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2013, 398:441–448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fuks D, Piessen G, Huet E, Tavernier M, Zerbib P, Michot F, Scotte M, Triboulet J-P, Mariette C, Chiche L, Salame E, Segol P, Pruvot F-R, Mauvais F, Roman H, Verhaeghe P, Regimbeau J-M: Life-threatening postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade C) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, prognosis, and risk factors. Am J Surg 2009, 197:702–709.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gao Q-X, Lee H-Y, Wu W-H, Gao S, Yang Y-M, Ma IT, Cai M-S: Factors associated with post-pancreaticoduodenectomy hemorrhage: 303 consecutive cases analysis. Chin Med J 2012, 125:1571–1575.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grützmann R, Rückert F, Hippe-Davies N, Distler M, Saeger H-D: Evaluation of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery definition of post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage in a high-volume center. Surgery 2012, 151:612–620.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roulin D, Cerantola Y, Demartines N, Schäfer M: Systematic review of delayed postoperative hemorrhage after pancreatic resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2011, 15:1055–1062.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wente MN, Veit JA, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW: Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH): an International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definition. Surgery 2007, 142:20–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yekebas EF, Wolfram L, Cataldegirmen G, Habermann CR, Bogoevski D, Koenig AM, Kaifi J, Schurr PG, Bubenheim M, Nolte-Ernsting C, Adam G, Izbicki JR: Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage: diagnosis and treatment. Ann Surg 2007, 246:269–280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M: Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery 2005, 138:8–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wellner UF, Makowiec F, Sick O, Hopt UT, Keck T: Arguments for an individualized closure of the pancreatic remnant after distal pancreatic resection. World J Gastrointest Surg 2012, 4:114–120.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keck T, Adam U, Makowiec F, Riediger H, Wellner U, Tittelbach-Helmrich D, Hopt UT: Short- and long-term results of duodenum preservation versus resection for the management of chronic pancreatitis: a prospective, randomized study. Surgery 2012, 152(3 Suppl 1):S95–S102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wellner UF, Sick O, Olschewski M, Adam U, Hopt UT, Keck T: Randomized controlled single-center trial comparing pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy after partial pancreatoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2012, 16:1686–1695.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wellner UF, Brett S, Bruckner T, Limprecht R, Rossion I, Seiler C, Sick O, Wegener I, Hopt UT, Keck T, RECOPANC Trial Group: Pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy for RECOnstruction after partial PANCreatoduodenectomy (RECOPANC): study protocol of a randomized controlled trial UTN U1111-1117-9588. Trials 2012, 13:45.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ansorge C, Strömmer L, Andrén-Sandberg Å, Lundell L, Herrington MK, Segersvärd R: Structured intraoperative assessment of pancreatic gland characteristics in predicting complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 2012, 99:1076–1082.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Belyaev O, Herden H, Meier JJ, Muller CA, Seelig MH, Herzog T, Tannapfel A, Schmidt WE, Uhl W: Assessment of pancreatic hardness-surgeon versus durometer. The Journal of surgical research 2008.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Belyaev O, Munding J, Herzog T, Suelberg D, Tannapfel A, Schmidt WE, Mueller CA, Uhl W: Histomorphological features of the pancreatic remnant as independent risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula: a matched-pairs analysis. Pancreatology 2011, 11:516–524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wellner UF, Kayser G, Lapshyn H, Sick O, Makowiec F, Hoppner J, Hopt UT, Keck T: A simple scoring system based on clinical factors related to pancreatic texture predicts postoperative pancreatic fistula preoperatively. HPB (Oxford) 2010, 12:696–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Van Berge Henegouwen MI, De Wit LT, Van Gulik TM, Obertop H, Gouma DJ: Incidence, risk factors, and treatment of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy: drainage versus resection of the pancreatic remnant. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 1997, 185:18–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Farley DR, Schwall G, Trede M: Completion pancreatectomy for surgical complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg 1996, 83:176–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Paye F, Lupinacci RM, Kraemer A, Lescot T, Chafaï N, Tiret E, Balladur P: Surgical treatment of severe pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy by wirsungostomy and repeat pancreatico-jejunal anastomosis. Am J Surg 2013, 206:194–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ribero D, Amisano M, Zimmitti G, Giraldi F, Ferrero A, Capussotti L: External tube pancreatostomy reduces the risk of mortality associated with completion pancreatectomy for symptomatic fistulas complicating pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2013, 17:332–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kent TS, Callery MP, Vollmer CM: The bridge stent technique for salvage of pancreaticojejunal anastomotic dehiscence. HPB (Oxford) 2010, 12:577–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Königsrainer I, Zieker D, Beckert S, Glatzle J, Schroeder TH, Heininger A, Nadalin S, Königsrainer A: A pancreas-preserving technique for the management of symptomatic pancreatic anastomotic insufficiency refractory to conservative treatment after pancreas head resection. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2010, 395:693–696.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu J, Dai X, Bu X, Gao F, Zhang X: Pancreaticojejunal bridge-anastomosis: a novel option for surgeon to preserve pancreatic body and tail in urgent reoperation for intra-abdominal massive hemorrhage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Surg 2010, 34:2457–2462.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eckardt AJ, Klein F, Adler A, Veltzke-Schlieker W, Warnick P, Bahra M, Wiedenmann B, Neuhaus P, Neumann K, Glanemann M: Management and outcomes of haemorrhage after pancreatogastrostomy versus pancreatojejunostomy. Br J Surg 2011, 98:1599–1607.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pocock SJ, Assmann SE, Enos LE, Kasten LE: Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems. Stat Med 2002, 21:2917–2930.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nakahara O, Takamori H, Ikeda O, Kuroki H, Ikuta Y, Chikamoto A, Beppu T, Yamashita Y, Baba H: Risk factors associated with delayed haemorrhage after pancreatic resection. HPB (Oxford) 2012, 14:684–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rosso E, Casnedi S, Pessaux P, Oussoultzoglou E, Panaro F, Mahfud M, Jaeck D, Bachellier P: The role of “fatty pancreas” and of BMI in the occurrence of pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2009, 13:1845–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Castleberry AW, White RR, De La Fuente SG, Clary BM, Blazer DG 3rd, McCann RL, Pappas TN, Tyler DS, Scarborough JE: The impact of vascular resection on early postoperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy: an analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database. Ann Surg Oncol 2012.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gooiker GA, van Gijn W, Wouters MWJM, Post PN, van de Velde CJH, Tollenaar RAEM: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume-outcome relationship in pancreatic surgery. Br J Surg 2011, 98:485–494.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Iacono C, Ruzzenente A, Campagnaro T, Bortolasi L, Valdegamberi A, Guglielmi A: Role of preoperative biliary drainage in jaundiced patients who are candidates for pancreatoduodenectomy or hepatic resection: highlights and drawbacks. Ann Surg 2013, 257:191–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mezhir JJ, Brennan MF, Baser RE, D'Angelica MI, Fong Y, DeMatteo RP, Jarnagin WR, Allen PJ: A matched case–control study of preoperative biliary drainage in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma: routine drainage is not justified. J Gastrointest Surg 2009, 13:2163–2169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vollmer CM Jr, Sanchez N, Gondek S, McAuliffe J, Kent TS, Christein JD, Callery MP: A root-cause analysis of mortality following major pancreatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2012, 16:89–102; discussion 102–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Topal B, Fieuws S, Aerts R, Weerts J, Feryn T, Roeyen G, Bertrand C, Hubert C, Janssens M, Closset J, Belgian Section of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery: Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2013, 14:655–662.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fernandez-Cruz L, Cosa R, Blanco L, Lopez-Boado MA, Astudillo E: Pancreatogastrostomy with gastric partition after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy versus conventional pancreatojejunostomy: a prospective randomized study. Annals of Surgery 2008, 248:930–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E, Salvia R, Butturini G, Sartori N, Mantovani W, Pederzoli P: Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Annals of Surgery 2005, 242:767–71, discussion 771–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. F. Wellner
    • 1
    • 2
  • B. Kulemann
    • 1
  • H. Lapshyn
    • 1
  • J. Hoeppner
    • 1
  • O. Sick
    • 1
  • F. Makowiec
    • 1
  • D. Bausch
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ulrich Theodor Hopt
    • 1
    Email author
  • T. Keck
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Clinic for General and Visceral SurgeryUniversity Medical Center FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Clinic for SurgeryUniversity Clinic Schleswig-Holstein Campus LübeckLübeckGermany

Personalised recommendations