Advertisement

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 17, Issue 8, pp 1392–1398 | Cite as

Splenic Vein Thrombosis Is Associated with an Increase in Pancreas-Specific Complications and Reduced Survival in Patients Undergoing Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Exocrine Cancer

  • Nishi Dedania
  • Nidhi Agrawal
  • Jordan M. Winter
  • Leonidas G. Koniaris
  • Ernest L. Rosato
  • Patricia K. Sauter
  • Ben Leiby
  • Edward Pequignot
  • Charles J. Yeo
  • Harish LavuEmail author
2012 SSAT Poster Presentation

Abstract

Distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy (DPS) is the procedure of choice for the surgical treatment of pancreatic exocrine cancer localized to the body and tail of the pancreas. Splenic vein thrombosis (SVT) can occur in patients with malignant pancreatic exocrine tumors secondary to direct tumor invasion or compression of the splenic vein by mass effect. This study examines the effect of preoperative SVT on postoperative outcomes. In this retrospective cohort study, we queried our pancreatic surgery database to identify patients who underwent DPS from October 2005 to June 2011. These cases were evaluated for evidence of preoperative SVT on clinical records and cross-sectional imaging (CT, MRI, endoscopic US). Outcomes for patients with and without SVT were compared. From an overall cohort of 285 consecutive patients who underwent DPS during the study period, data were evaluated for 70 subjects who underwent surgery for pancreatic exocrine cancer (27 with SVT, 43 without SVT). The preoperative demographics and co-morbidities were similar between the groups, except the average age was higher for those without SVT (p < 0.05). The median estimated blood loss was significantly higher in the SVT group (675 versus 250 ml, p = <0.001). While the overall morbidity rates were similar between the two groups (48 % SVT versus 56 % no SVT, p = NS), the group with SVT had a significantly higher rate of pancreas-specific complications, including pancreatic fistula (33 versus 7 %, p < 0.01) and delayed gastric emptying (15 versus 0 %, p < 0.02). Hospital readmission rates were similar between the groups (30 versus 28 %, p = NS). Patients without SVT had a trend toward longer median survival (40 versus 20.8 months), although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.1). DPS for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma can be performed safely in patients with SVT, but with higher intraoperative blood loss, increased pancreas-specific complications, and a trend towards lower long-term survival rates. This paper was presented as a poster at the 53rd annual meeting of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract and at the 46th annual meeting of the Pancreas Club, San Diego, CA, May 2012.

Keywords

Pancreatic cancer Splenic vein thrombosis Distal pancreatectomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Siegel R, Ward E, Brawley O, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2011: The impact of eliminating socioeconomic and racial disparities on premature cancer deaths. CA Cancer J Clin. 011; 61:212–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA, Arnold MA, Chang DC, Coleman J, Hodgin MB, Sauter PK, Hruban RH, Riall TS, Schulick RD, Choti MA, Lillemoe KD,Yeo CJ. 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg, 10 (2006), p. 1199PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schnelldorfer T, Ware AL, Sarr MG, Smyrk TC, Zhang L, Qin R, Gullerud RE, Donohue JH, Nagorney DM, Farnell MB. Long-term survival after pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: is cure possible? Ann Surg. 2008 Mar;247(3):456–62.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shaib YH, Davila JA, El-Serag HB. The epidemiology of pancreatic cancer in the United States: changes below the surface. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;24(1):87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Holly EA, Chaliha I, Bracci PM, Gautam M. Signs and symptoms of pancreatic cancer: a population-based case–control study in the San Francisco Bay area. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2(6):510.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    American Gastroenterological Association Medical Position Statement: Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology 1999; 117:1463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heider TR, Azeem S, Galanko JA, Behrns KE. The natural history of pancreatitis-induced splenic vein thrombosis. Ann Surg. 2004 Jun; 239(6):876–80; discussion 880.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F.L. Greene, D.L. Page, I.D. Fleming et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. American Joint Committee on Cancer. (6th ed.) Springer, New York, NY (2002).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wente MN, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Fingerhut A, Gouma DJ, Izbicki JR, Neoptolemos JP, Padbury RT, Sarr MG, Traverso LW, Yeo CJ, Büchler MW. Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: a suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery, 142 (2007), pp. 761–768.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G, Fingerhut A, Yeo C, Izbicki J, Neoptolemos J, Sarr M, Traverso W, Buchler M. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery, 138 (2005), pp. 8–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    V G McDermott, R E England, and G E Newman. Bleeding gastric varices secondary to splenic vein thrombosis successfully treated by splenic artery embolization. Br J Radiol. August 1995 68:928–930; doi:  10.1259/0007-1285-68-812-928.
  12. 12.
    Shrikhande SV, D’Souza M. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy: Evolving definitions, preventive strategies and modern management. J Gastroenterol. 2008 Oct 14; 14(38): 5789–5796.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kunstman JW, Fonseca AL, Ciarleglio MM, Cong X, Hochberg A, Salem RR (2012) Comprehensive analysis of variables affecting delayed gastric emptying following pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 16:1354–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Carter TI, Fong ZV, Hyslop T, Lavu H, Tan WP, Hardacre J, Sauter PK, Kennedy EP, Yeo CJ, Rosato EL (2013) A dual-institution randomized controlled trial of remnant closure after distal pancreatectomy: does the addition of a falciform patch and fibrin glue improve outcomes? J Gastrointest Surg 17:102–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Warshaw AL, Gu Z, Wittenberg J, Waltman AC. Preoperative staging and assessment of resectability of pancreatic cancer. Arch Surg 1990; 125:230–233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    NCCN (2013) National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Available at: www.nccn.org (Accessed on October 13, 2011).
  17. 17.
    Callery MP, Chang KJ, Fishman EK, Talamonti MS, William Traverso L, Linehan DC. Pretreatment assessment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: expert consensus statement. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16(7):1727.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Greer SE, Pipas JM, Sutton JE, Zaki BI, Tsapakos M, Colacchio TA, Gibson JJ, Wiener DC, Ripple GH, Barth RJ Jr. Effect of neoadjuvant therapy on local recurrence after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 2008; 206(3):451.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Koniaris L, Kaushal S, Abrams RA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Hruban RH, Lillemoe KD. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas-616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000 Nov-Dec;4(6):567–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nishi Dedania
    • 1
  • Nidhi Agrawal
    • 1
  • Jordan M. Winter
    • 1
  • Leonidas G. Koniaris
    • 1
  • Ernest L. Rosato
    • 1
  • Patricia K. Sauter
    • 1
  • Ben Leiby
    • 1
  • Edward Pequignot
    • 1
  • Charles J. Yeo
    • 1
  • Harish Lavu
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson UniversityJefferson Pancreas, Biliary and Related Cancer CenterPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations