A Nationwide Analysis of Laparoscopy in High-Risk Colorectal Surgery Patients
- 474 Downloads
Due to safety concerns, the use of laparoscopy in high-risk colorectal surgery patients has been limited. Small reports have demonstrated the benefit of laparoscopy in this population; however, large comparative studies are lacking.
A retrospective review of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2009 was conducted. Patients undergoing elective colorectal resections for benign and malignant pathology were included in the high-risk group if they had at least two of the following criteria: age > 70, obesity, smoking, anemia, congestive heart failure, valvular disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic pulmonary, kidney and liver disease. Using multivariate logistic regression, the outcomes of laparoscopic surgery were compared to open and converted surgery.
Of 145,600 colorectal surgery cases, 32.79% were high-risk. High-risk patients had higher mortality, hospital charges, and longer hospital stay compared to low-risk patients. The use of laparoscopy was lower in the high-risk group with higher conversion rates. In high-risk patients, compared to open surgery, laparoscopy was associated with lower mortality (OR = 0.60), shorter hospital stay, lower charges, decreased respiratory failure (OR = 0.53), urinary tract infection (OR = 0.64), anastomotic leak (OR = 0.69) and wound complications (OR = 0.46). Conversion to open surgery was not associated with higher mortality.
Laparoscopy in high-risk colorectal patients is safe and may demonstrate advantages compared to open surgery.
KeywordsLaparoscopic Colorectal surgery High risk Nationwide inpatient sample Colon cancer Rectal cancer Colorectal polyps Diverticular disease Diverticulitis
- 9.Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AM, et al. Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2005;365(9472):1718–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Makino T, Shukla PJ, Rubino F, Milsom JW. The Impact of Obesity on Perioperative Outcomes After Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection: A Review. Ann Surg. 2012;255(2):228–36.Google Scholar
- 28.Services UDHaH, Quality AfHRa. Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2009. 2009Google Scholar
- 38.Huber PJ. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. 1967 221–33Google Scholar
- 39.Holm S. A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics. 1979;6(2):65–70.Google Scholar
- 44.Arteaga Gonzalez I, Lopez-Tomassetti Fernandez EM, Hernandez Pinero Y, Martin Malagon A, Arranz Duran J, Bethencourt Munoz S, et al. Effectiveness of colorectal laparoscopic surgery on patients at high anesthetic risk: an intervention cohort study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23(1):101–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar