Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 814–821 | Cite as

Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy (ALPPS): Tips and Tricks

  • Fernando A. Alvarez
  • Victoria Ardiles
  • Rodrigo Sanchez Claria
  • Juan Pekolj
  • Eduardo de Santibañes
How I do it

Abstract

Background

Posthepatectomy liver failure is the most severe complication after major hepatectomies and it is associated with an insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation (PVL) has recently been described as a revolutionary strategy to induce a rapid and large FLR volume increase. We aim to describe our surgical technique, patient management, and preliminary results with this new two-stage approach.

Technique

During the first stage, liver partition and PVL of the diseased hemiliver are performed. The completion surgery is carried out after volumetric studies have demonstrated a sufficient FLR and provided the patient is in good condition. This is usually achieved after 7 days. In the second step, the patient undergoes a completion surgery with right hepatectomy, right trisectionectomy, or left trisectionectomy.

Results

Fifteen patients with advanced liver tumors were treated. Nine patients were males and the mean age was 54 years old. The mean difference between the preoperative and postoperative FLR volume was 303 ml (p < 0.001), which represented a mean volume increase of 78.4 %. All resections were R0. Morbidity and mortality rates were 53 and 0 %, respectively. The average hospital stay was 19 days.

Conclusions

The presented technique was feasible and safe in the hands of experienced hepatobiliary surgeons, with satisfactory short-term results. It induces rapid liver hypertrophy and at the same time it offers the possibility of cure to patients previously declared unresectable.

Keywords

Portal vein ligation Liver tumors Metastases Surgical technique Hypertrophy 

References

  1. 1.
    Agrawal S, Belghiti J. Oncologic resection for malignant tumors of the liver. Ann Surg 2011;253:656–665.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adam R, Laurent A, Azoulay D, Castaing D, Bismuth H. Two-stage hepatectomy: a planned strategy to treat irresectable liver tumors. Ann Surg 2000;232:777–785.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clavien PA, Petrowsky H, DeOliveira ML, Graf R. Strategies for safer liver surgery and partial liver transplantation. N Engl J Med 2007;356:1545–1559-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Santibañes E, Clavien PA. Playing Play-Doh to Prevent Postoperative Liver Failure. The “ALPPS” approach. Ann Surg 2012;255:415–417.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schnitzbauer AA, Lang SA, Goessmann H, Nadalin S, Baumgart J, Farkas SA, Fichtner-Feigl S, Lorf T, Goralcyk A, Hörbelt R, Kroemer A, Loss M, Rümmele P, Scherer MN, Padberg W, Königsrainer A, Lang H, Obed A, Schlitt HJ. Right portal vein ligation combined with in situ splitting induces rapid left lateral liver lobe hypertrophy enabling two-staged extended right hepatic resection in small-for-size settings. Ann Surg 2012;255:405–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baumgart J, Lang S, Lang H. A new method for induction of liver hypertrophy prior to right trisectionectomy: a report of three cases. HPB (Oxford) 2011;13(suppl 2):1–145.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Santibañes E, Alvarez FA, Ardiles V. How to avoid postoperative liver failure: a novel method. World J Surg 2012;36:125–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alvarez FA, Iniesta J, Lastiri J, Ulla M, Bonadeo Lassalle F, de Santibañes E. New method of hepatic regeneration. Cir Esp 2011;89:645–649.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibañes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009;250:187–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Brooke-Smith M, Crawford M, Adam R, Koch M, Makuuchi M, Dematteo RP, Christophi C, Banting S, Usatoff V, Nagino M, Maddern G, Hugh TJ, Vauthey JN, Greig P, Rees M, Yokoyama Y, Fan ST, Nimura Y, Figueras J, Capussotti L, Büchler MW, Weitz J. Posthepatectomy liver failure: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). Surgery 2011;149:713–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Makuuchi M, Thai BL, Takayasu K, Takayama T, Kosuge T, Gunvén P, Yamazaki S, Hasegawa H, Ozaki H. Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report. Surgery 1990;107:521–527.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jaeck D, Oussoultzoglou E, Rosso E, Greget M, Weber JC, Bachellier P. A two-stage hepatectomy procedure combined with portal vein embolization to achieve curative resection for initially unresectable multiple and bilobar colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg 2004;240:1037–1049.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Furrer K, Tian Y, Pfammatter T, Jochum W, El-Badry AM, Graf R, Clavien PA. Selective portal vein embolization and ligation trigger different regenerative responses in the rat liver. Hepatology 2008;47:1615–1623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aussilhou B, Lesurtel M, Sauvanet A, Farges O, Dokmak S, Goasguen N, Sibert A, Vilgrain V, Belghiti J. Right portal vein ligation is as efficient as portal vein embolization to induce hypertrophy of the left liver remnant. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12:297–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heinrich S, Jochum W, Graf R, Clavien PA. Portal vein ligation and partial hepatectomy differentially influence growth of intrahepatic metastasis and liver regeneration in mice. J Hepatol 2006;45:35–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elias D, De Baere T, Roche A, Ducreux M, Leclere J, Lasser P. During liver regeneration following right portal embolization the growth rate of liver metastases is more rapid than that of the liver parenchyma. Br J Surg 1999;86:784–788.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kokudo N, Tada K, Seki M, Ohta H, Azekura K, Ueno M, Ohta K, Yamaguchi T, Matsubara T, Takahashi T, Nakajima T, Muto T, Ikari T, Yanagisawa A, Kato Y. Proliferative activity of intrahepatic colorectal metastases after preoperative hemihepatic portal vein embolization. Hepatology 2001;34:267–272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clavien PA, Oberkofler CE, Raptis DA, Lehmann K, Rickenbacher A, El-Badry AM. What is critical for liver surgery and partial liver transplantation: size or quality?. Hepatology 2010;52:715–729.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yokoyama Y, Nagino M, Nimura Y. Mechanisms of hepatic regeneration following portal vein embolization and partial hepatectomy: a review. World J Surg 2007;31:367–374.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ding BS, Nolan DJ, Butler JM, James D, Babazadeh AO, Rosenwaks Z, Mittal V, Kobayashi H, Shido K, Lyden D, Sato TN, Rabbany SY, Rafii S. Inductive angiocrine signals from sinusoidal endothelium are required for liver regeneration. Nature 2010;468:310–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Clavien PA, Lillemoe KD. Note from the editors on the ALPPS e-Letters-to-the-Editor. Ann Surg 2012;256(3):552.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando A. Alvarez
    • 1
  • Victoria Ardiles
    • 1
  • Rodrigo Sanchez Claria
    • 1
  • Juan Pekolj
    • 1
  • Eduardo de Santibañes
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.General Surgery ServiceHospital Italiano de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.Buenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations