Pancreatic Enucleation: Improved Outcomes Compared to Resection
- 623 Downloads
Pancreatic enucleation is associated with a low operative mortality and preserved pancreatic parenchyma. However, enucleation is an uncommon operation, and good comparative data with resection are lacking. Therefore, the aim of this analysis was to compare the outcomes of pancreatic enucleation and resection.
Material and Methods
From 1998 through 2010, 45 consecutive patients with small (mean, 2.3 cm) pancreatic lesions underwent enucleation. These patients were matched with 90 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (n = 38) or distal pancreatectomy (n = 52). Serious morbidity was defined in accordance with the American College of Surgeons–National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Outcomes were compared with standard statistical analyses.
Operative time was shorter (183 vs. 271 min, p < 0.01), and operative blood loss was significantly lower (160 vs. 691 ml, p < 0.01) with enucleation. Fewer patients undergoing enucleation required monitoring in an intensive care unit (20% vs. 41%, p < 0.02). Serious morbidity was less common among patients who underwent enucleation compared to those who had a resection (13% vs. 29%, p = 0.05). Pancreatic endocrine (4% vs. 17%, p = 0.05) and exocrine (2% vs. 17%, p < 0.05) insufficiency were less common with enucleation. Ten-year survival was no different between enucleation and resection.
Compared to resection, pancreatic enucleation is associated with improved operative as well as short- and long-term postoperative outcomes. For small benign and premalignant pancreatic lesions, enucleation should be considered the procedure of choice when technically appropriate.
KeywordsCystic tumors Enucleation Neuroendocrine tumors Pancreatic resection
Funding for this work was provided by the Indiana University Department of Surgery.
- 2.Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD, Sohn TA, Campbell KA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Abrams RA, Hruban RH. Pancreaticoduodenectomy With Or Without Distal Gastrectomy And Extended Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy For Periampullary Adenocarcinoma, Part 2: Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Survival, Morbidity, And Mortality. Ann Surg 2002;23:355–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Schmidt CM, Powerll ES, Yiannoutsos CT, Howard TJ, Wiebke EA, Wiesenauer CA, Baumgardner JA, Cummings OW, Jacobson LE, Broadie TA, Danal DF, Goulet RJ Jr, Curie EA, Cardenes H, Watkins JM, Loehrer PJ, Lillemoe KD, Madura JA. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A 20-Year Experience In 516 Patients. Arch Surg 2004;139:718–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Schmidt CM, Turrini O, Parikh P, House MJ, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Howard TJ, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD. Effect Of Hospital Volume, Surgeon Experience, And Surgeon Volume On Patient Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Single-Institution Experience. Arch Surg 2010;145:634–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kooby DA, Gillespie T, Bentrem D, Nakeeb A, Schmidt CM, Merchant NB, Parikh AA, Martin RCG, Scoggins CR, Ahmad S, Kim HJ, Park J, Johnston F, Strouch MJ, Menze A, Rymer J, Mcclaine R, Strasberg S, Talamonti MS, Staley CA, Mcmasters KM, Lowy AM, Byrd-Sellers J, Wood WC, Hawkins WG. Left-Sided Pancreatectomy: A Multicenter Comparison Of Laparoscopic And Open Approaches. Ann Surg 2008;248:438–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Guo, KJ, Liao HH, Tian YL, Guo RX, He SG, Shen K. Surgical Treatment Of Nonfunctioning Islet Cell Tumor: Report Of 41 Cases. Hepatobil Panc Dis Internat 2004;3:469–72.Google Scholar