Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 486–494

Does Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIE) Provide for Comparable Oncologic Outcomes to Open Techniques? A Systematic Review

Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to compare minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and open techniques with respect to oncologic outcomes through analysis of the extent of lymph node clearance, number of lymph nodes retrieved, oncologic stage, and 5-year mortality.

Methodology

A systematic review of the literature review was conducted using MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases (1950–2011), and evaluated all comparative studies. Comparison between the open and MIE/hybrid MIE (HMIE) groups was possible with data being available for direct comparison.

Results

After careful review, 17 case–control studies with 1,586 patients having an esophagectomy were included in this systematic review. The median (range) number of lymph nodes found in the MIE, open and HMIE groups were 16 (5.7–33.90), 10 (3–32.80) and 17 (17–17.15), of which there was significance between the MIE and open groups (p = 0.03) but not significant between MIE versus HMIE (p = 0.25). There was no statistical significance in pathologic stage between open, MIE and HMIE groups. Generally, there were good short-term (30 day) survival rates between all three groups. The open group had 5-year survival rates between 16% and 57% compared to the MIE group 12.5%–63% (p = 0.33). Overall 5-year survival was found to be not significant between open group and MIE (p = 0.93). MIE does not appear on statistical evidence to present any survival advantage.

Conclusion

The evidence of this study suggests that MIE is equivalent to standard open esophagectomy in achieving similar oncological outcomes. Further randomised controlled trials are required to provide for a higher level of evidence.

Keywords

Esophagectomy Adenocarcinoma Squamous cell carcinoma Minimally invasive Open esophagectomy 

References

  1. 1.
    Law S. Minimally invasive techniques for oesophageal cancer surgery. Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology. 2006;20(5):925–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berrisford RG, Wajed SA, Sanders D, Rucklidge MW. Short-term outcomes following total minimally invasive oesophagectomy. British Journal of Surgery. 2008;95(5):602–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sanders G, Borie F, Husson E, Blanc P, Mauro G, Claus C, et al. Minimally invasive transhiatal esophagectomy: lessons learned. Surgical Endoscopy. 2007;21(7):1190–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biere SS, van der Peet DL, Cuesta MA. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Annals of Surgery. 2010;251(1):178–9; author reply 9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nagpal K, Ahmed K, Vats A, Yakoub D, James D, Ashrafian H, et al. Is minimally invasive surgery beneficial in the management of esophageal cancer? A meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2010;28:28.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Radtke A, Musholt TJ, Timm S, Rink A, et al. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy: Meta-Analysis of Outcomes. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;26:26.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fabian T, Martin JT, McKelvey AA, Federico JA. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a teaching hospital’s first year experience. Diseases of the Esophagus. 2008;21(3):220–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Law S. Optimal surgical approach for esophagectomy: the debate still goes on? Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery: official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia. 2009;15(5):277.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nguyen N, Hinojosa M, Smith B, Chang K, Gray J, Hoyt D. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations. Annals of Surgery. 2008;248(6):1081.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Law S, Fok M, Chu K, Wong J. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery. 1997;122(1):8–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stein H, Siewert J. Improved prognosis of resected esophageal cancer. World Journal of Surgery. 2004;28(6):520–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Biere SS, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chirurgica. 2009;64(2):121–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luketich J, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura P, Christie N, McCaughan J, Litle V, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Annals of Surgery. 2003;238(4):486.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Parameswaran R, Veeramootoo D, Krishnadas R, Cooper M, Berrisford R, Wajed S. Comparative experience of open and minimally invasive esophagogastric resection. World Journal of Surgery. 2009;33(9):1868–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Verhage RJ, Hazebroek EJ, Boone J, Van Hillegersberg R. Minimally invasive surgery compared to open procedures in esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Minerva Chirurgica. 2009;64(2):135–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas JM. Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Annals of Surgery. 2007;245(2):232–40.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perry K, Enestvedt C, Pham T, Welker M, Jobe B, Hunter J, et al. Comparison of Laparoscopic Inversion Esophagectomy and Open Transhiatal Esophagectomy for High-Grade Dysplasia and Stage I Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Archives of Surgery. 2009;144(7):679.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pham T, Perry K, Dolan J, Schipper P, Sukumar M, Sheppard B, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes after combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy and open Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy. The American Journal of Surgery. 2010;199(5):594–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rizk N, Ishwaran H, Rice T, Chen L, Schipper P, Kesler K, et al. Optimum lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Annals of Surgery. 2010;251(1):46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kang CH, Kim YT, Jeon SH, Sung SW, Kim JH. Lymphadenectomy extent is closely related to long-term survival in esophageal cancer. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. 2007;31(2):154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martin D, Church N, Kennedy C, Falk G. Does systematic 2 field lymphadenectomy for esophageal malignancy offer a survival advantage? Results from 178 consecutive patients. Diseases of the Esophagus. 2008;21(7):612–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peyre C, Hagen J, DeMeester S, Altorki N, Ancona E, Griffin S, et al. The number of lymph nodes removed predicts survival in esophageal cancer: an international study on the impact of extent of surgical resection. Annals of Surgery. 2008;248(4):549.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perry K, Enestvedt C, Diggs B, Jobe B, Hunter J. Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic transhiatal inversion esophagectomy compare favorably with those of combined thoracoscopic–laparoscopic esophagectomy. Surgical Endoscopy. 2009;23(9):2147–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Decker G, Coosemans W, De Leyn P, Decaluwe H, Nafteux P, Van Raemdonck D, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery. 2009;35(1):13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D, Esterman AJ, Bessell JR, Thompson SK, et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 2009;87(3):911–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gemmill EH, McCulloch P. Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer. British Journal of Surgery. 2007;94(12):1461–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Qureshi I, Nason K, Luketich J. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy indicated for cancer? Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy. 2008;8(9):1449–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schoppmann S, Prager G, Langer F, Riegler F, Kabon B, Fleischmann E, et al. Open versus minimally invasive esophagectomy: a single-center case controlled study. Surgical Endoscopy. 2010 (Epub ahead of print):1–10.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shiraishi T, Kawahara K, Shirakusa T, Yamamoto S, Maekawa T. Risk analysis in resection of thoracic esophageal cancer in the era of endoscopic surgery. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2006;81(3):1083–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bresadola V, Terrosu G, Cojutti A, Benzoni E, Baracchini E, Bresadola F. Laparoscopic versus open gastroplasty in esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a comparative study. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2006;16(2):63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kunisaki C, Hatori S, Imada T, Akiyama H, Ono H, Otsuka Y, et al. Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy With a Voice-controlled Robot: The AESOP System. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2004;14(6):323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Van den Broek W, Makay Ö, Berends F, Yuan J, Houdijk A, Meijer S, et al. Laparoscopically assisted transhiatal resection for malignancies of the distal esophagus. Surgical Endoscopy. 2004;18(5):812–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M, Takada N, Lee S, Kinoshita H. A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation. British Journal of Surgery. 2003;90(1):108–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shah R, Jobe BA. Open Versus Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: What is the Best Approach? Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2011:1–3.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Taguchi S, Osugi H, Higashino M, Tokuhara T, Takada N, Takemura M, et al. Comparison of three-field esophagectomy for esophageal cancer incorporating open or thoracoscopic thoracotomy. Surgical Endoscopy. 2003;17(9):1445–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nguyen N, Follette D, Wolfe B, Schneider P, Roberts P, Goodnight Jr J. Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. Archives of Surgery. 2000;135(8):920.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bernabe K, Bolton J, Richardson W. Laparoscopic hand-assisted versus open transhiatal esophagectomy: a case–control study. Surgical Endoscopy. 2005;19(3):334–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Benzoni E, Terrosu G, Bresadola V, Uzzau A, Intini S, Noce L, et al. A comparative study of the transhiatal laparoscopic approach versus laparoscopic gastric mobilisation and right open transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer management. Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases. 2007;16(4):395.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Smithers BM. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: an overview. Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology. 2010;4(1):91–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marc M. Dantoc
    • 1
  • Michael R. Cox
    • 1
  • Guy D. Eslick
    • 1
  1. 1.The Whiteley-Martin Research Centre, Discipline of Surgery, The University of Sydney, Sydney Medical SchoolUniversity of Sydney, Nepean HospitalPenrithAustralia

Personalised recommendations