Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 801–805 | Cite as

Outcomes Following Laparoscopic Choledochoduodenostomy in the Management of Benign Biliary Obstruction

  • Yashodhan S. Khajanchee
  • Maria A. Cassera
  • Chet W. Hammill
  • Lee L. Swanström
  • Paul D. HansenEmail author
Original Article



With the advent of endoscopic retrograde choledochoduodenostomy, the need for choledochoduodenostomy to treat common bile duct obstruction is less common, but occasionally required.


Patients considered for laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy secondary to benign conditions between 1999 and 2009 at a single institution were included. Charts were retrospectively reviewed for preoperative, operative, and long-term outcomes data.


Twenty patients were identified; 15 with chronic choledocholithiasis causing benign biliary obstruction or chronic recurrent cholangitis, 3 with chronic relapsing pancreatitis, and 2 with distal common bile duct strictures. Mean operative time was 270 min. No major operative complications were reported. Five patients with severe adhesions or portal hypertension required conversion to laparotomy. Median hospital stay was 6 days (range, 2–32). Postoperatively, three (20%) patients completed laparoscopically and three (66.7%) patients converted to laparotomy had complications. In addition, one death due to myocardial infarction was reported 4 weeks after hospital discharge. With an average follow-up of 21 months, only one patient (5%) developed recurrent symptoms.


Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy is a useful technique in patients with benign, refractory common bile duct obstruction. This technically demanding procedure is feasible; however, the associated comorbidities in this complex group of patients result in a relatively high complication rate.


Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy ERCP Sump syndrome Choledochalithiasis 


  1. 1.
    de Almeida AC, dos Santos NM, Aldeia FJ: Choledochoduodenostomy in the management of common duct stones or associated pathology—an obsolete method? HPB Surg 1996, 10(1):27–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gurbuz AT, Watson D, Fenoglio ME: Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy. Am Surg 1999, 65(3):212–214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jeyapalan M, Almeida JA, Michaelson RL, Franklin ME, Jr.: Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy: review of a 4-year experience with an uncommon problem. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002, 12(3):148–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tinoco R, El-Kadre L, Tinoco A: Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1999, 9(2):123–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Uchiyama K, Onishi H, Tani M, Kinoshita H, Kawai M, Ueno M, Yamaue H: Long-term prognosis after treatment of patients with choledocholithiasis. Ann Surg 2003, 238(1):97–102.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ponsky JL: Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. World J Surg 1992, 16(6):1060–1065.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vaira D, D'Anna L, Ainley C, Dowsett J, Williams S, Baillie J, Cairns S, Croker J, Salmon P, Cotton P et al: Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1000 consecutive patients. Lancet 1989, 2(8660):431–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ, Moore JP, Fennerty MB, Ryan ME, Shaw MJ et al: Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996, 335(13):909–918.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Franceschi D, Brandt C, Margolin D, Szopa B, Ponsky J, Priebe P, Stellato T, Eckhauser ML: The management of common bile duct stones in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 1993, 59(8):525–532.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baker AR, Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL, Fossard DP: Sump syndrome following choledochoduodenostomy and its endoscopic treatment. Br J Surg 1985, 72(6):433–435.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eaton MC, Worthley CS, Toouli J: Treatment of postcholedochoduodenostomy symptoms. Aust N Z J Surg 1989, 59(10):771–774.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hiura A, Kim EC, Ikehara T, Matsumura Y, Mishima K, Ishida I: Hepatic abscess as a complication of the sump syndrome. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2000, 7(2):231–235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rumans MC, Katon RM, Lowe DK: Hepatic abscesses as a complication of the sump syndrome: combined surgical and endoscopic therapy. Case report and review of the literature. Gastroenterology 1987, 92(3):791–795.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Degenshein GA: Choledochoduodenostomy: an 18 year study of 175 consecutive cases. Surgery 1974, 76(2):319–324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Madden JL, Chun JY, Kandalaft S, Parekh M: Choledochoduodenostomy: an unjustly maligned surgical procedure? Am J Surg 1970, 119(1):45–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tang CN, Siu WT, Ha JP, Li MK: Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy: an effective drainage procedure for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis. Surg Endosc 2003, 17(10):1590–1594. Epub 2003 Jul 1521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Escudero-Fabre A, Escallon A, Jr., Sack J, Halpern NB, Aldrete JS: Choledochoduodenostomy. Analysis of 71 cases followed for 5 to 15 years. Ann Surg 1991, 213(6):635–642; discussion 643–634.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cuschieri A, Adamson GD: Multimedia article. Laparoscopic transection choledochoduodenostomy. Surg Endosc 2005, 19(5):728.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cuschieri A, Wood RA, Metcalf MJ, Cumming JG: Long-term experience with transection choledochoduodenostomy. World J Surg 1983, 7(4):502–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marangoni G, Ali A, Faraj W, Heaton N, Rela M: Clinical features and treatment of sump syndrome following hepaticojejunostomy. Hepatobiliary, 10(3):261–264.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Morrissey PE, Burns GA, Cohn SM: Sump syndrome complicating Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy: case report and review of the literature. Surgery 1996, 119(4):403–405.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Suo T, Song LJ, Tong SX: Gallstone in jejunal limb with jejunocolonic fistula 10 years after Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy. World, 3(1):38–40.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chida T, Kageyama F, Yamada M, Yoshii S, Honjo Y, Takai T, Iwaoka Y, Terai T, Kagami T, Yamazaki S et al: [A case of hemorrhage from varices of an interposed jejunum after choledochojejunostomy treated successfully by endoscopic injection using alpha-cyanoacrylate monomer]. Nippon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 1661, 107(10):1661–1668.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parrilla P, Ramirez P, Sanchez Bueno F, Perez JM, Candel MF, Muelas MS, Robles R: Long-term results of choledochoduodenostomy in the treatment of choledocholithiasis: assessment of 225 cases. Br J Surg 1991, 78(4):470–472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bennet W, Zimmerman MA, Campsen J, Mandell MS, Bak T, Wachs M, Kam I: Choledochoduodenostomy is a safe alternative to Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy for biliary reconstruction in liver transplantation. World J Surg 2009, 33(5):1022–1025.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kohn GP, Overby DW, Martinie JB: Robotic choledochojejunostomy with intracorporeal Roux limb construction. Int J Med Robot 2008, 4(3):263–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yashodhan S. Khajanchee
    • 1
  • Maria A. Cassera
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chet W. Hammill
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lee L. Swanström
    • 1
    • 2
  • Paul D. Hansen
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery ProgramProvidence Portland Medical CenterPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery DivisionThe Oregon ClinicPortlandUSA
  3. 3.Surgical Oncology and Liver and Pancreas Surgery ProgramProvidence Portland Medical CenterPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations