Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 754–757 | Cite as

Choledochoduodenostomy: Is It Really So Bad?

  • William McIver Leppard
  • Thomas Michael Shary
  • David B. Adams
  • Katherine A. Morgan
2010 SSAT Poster Presentation

Abstract

Background

Choledochoduodenostomy (CDD) has been shunned by some surgeons for the management of the benign distal common bile duct stricture due to the potential complication of “sump syndrome.” The feared sump syndrome is theorized to occur from bile stasis and reflux of duodenal contents into the terminal common bile duct with bacterial overgrowth, resulting in cholangitis or hepatic abscess. The true incidence and resultant morbidity of sump syndrome, however, are not well defined.

Methods

With the approval of the Institutional Review Board, a retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing choledochoduodenostomy for benign disease at a single institution between 1994 and 2008 was undertaken. Data were collected with particular attention to operative indications, perioperative course, and long-term results. Long-term outcomes were assessed through clinical reports at outpatient follow-up, emergency room visits, and hospital readmissions.

Results

Seventy-nine patients underwent side-to-side CDD for benign diseases over the 15-year period [51 (65%) men; mean age, 52 years (standard deviation (SD), 12)]. Indications for surgery included chronic pancreatitis (80%), choledocholithiasis (11%), and cholangitis (4%). Patients presented with abdominal pain (80%), nausea/vomiting (30%), and jaundice 13%. Sixty-one patients (77%) underwent an additional procedure at the time of their CDD, including lateral pancreaticojejunostomy (26%). There was no perioperative mortality. Postoperative complications occurred in 15 (19%) patients, including intraabdominal abscess (26%), wound infection (20%), and biliary leakage (13%). The mean hospital stay was 9.7 days (SD, 6.9). The mean follow-up was 6.2 years (SD, 4.2). There was no occurrence of cholangitis. Two patients (2.5%) developed hepatic abscess, which was managed by antibiotics and image-guided percutaneous drainage.

Conclusions

CDD is a safe and effective method of decompressing the distal common bile duct in benign pancreatobiliary disease. Long-term results are acceptable, with sump syndrome being a rare occurrence.

Keywords

Choledochoduodenostomy Chronic pancreatitis 

References

  1. 1.
    Hess, Walter. Textbook of Bilio-pancreatic Diseases. Padova, Italy: Piccia Nuova Libraria, 1997: 2828Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Escudero-Fabre A, Escallon A et al. Choledochoduodenostomy: Analysis of 71 cases followed for 5 to 15 years. Annals of Surgery. 1991; 213: 635–642.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gupta B. Choledochoduodenostomy: a study of 28 consecutive cases. Kathmandu University Medical Journal. 2003; 2: 193–197.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sanders RL. Indications for and value of Choledochoduodenostomy. Annals of Surgery. 1946; 3: 847–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jeyapalan M, Almeida J et al. Laparoscopic Choledochoduodenostomy: Review of a 4-Year Experience with an Uncommon Problem. Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques. 2002; 12: 148–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mendes De Almeida A, Dos Santos N et al. Choledochoduodenostomy in the Management of Common Duct Stones or Associated Pathology- An Obsolete Method? HPB Surgery. 1996; 10: 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blankensteijn J and Terpstra O. Early and late results following choledochoduodenostomy and choledochojejunostomy. HPB Surgery. 1990; 2: 151–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Srivengadesh G, Vikram K, and Anathakrishnan N. Evaluation of long-term results of choledochoduodenostomy for benign biliary obstruction. Tropical Gastroenterology. 2003; 24: 205–207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baker A, Neoptolemos J, Leese T et al. Long term follow-up of patients with side to side choledochoduodenostomy and transduodenal sphincteroplasty. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England. 1987; 68: 253–257.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Madden J, Chun J, Kandalaft et al. Choledochoduodenostomy: an unjustly maligned surgical problem. American Journal of Surgery. 1970; 119: 45–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    De Almeida A, Cruz A, Aldeia F. Side to side choledochodenostomy in the management of cholelithiasis and associated disease: facts and fiction. American Journal of Surgery 1984; 147: 253–259.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Caroli-Bosc F, Demarquay J et al. Endoscopic management of sump syndrome after choledochoduodenostomy: retrospective analysis of 30 cases. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2000; 51: 180–183.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pitt HA, Kaufman SL, Coleman J. Benign Postoperative Biliary Strictures. Annals of Surgery. 1989; 4: 417–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rothlin MA, Lopfe M and Largiader F. Long-Term Results of Hepaticojejunostomy for Benign Lesions of the Bile Ducts. The American Journal of Surgery. 1998; 1: 22–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ross CB, H’Doubler WZ, Sharp KW et al. Recent experience with benign biliary strictures. American Surgeon. 1989; 1: 64–70.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • William McIver Leppard
    • 1
  • Thomas Michael Shary
    • 1
  • David B. Adams
    • 2
  • Katherine A. Morgan
    • 3
  1. 1.Medical University of South CarolinaCharlestonUSA
  2. 2.Section of General and Gastrointestinal SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonUSA
  3. 3.Section of Laparoscopic and Gastrointestinal SurgeryMedical University of South CarolinaCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations