Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 389–396 | Cite as

Repair of Symptomatic Giant Paraesophageal Hernias in Elderly (>70 Years) Patients Results in Improved Quality of Life

  • Brian E. Louie
  • Maurice Blitz
  • Alexander S. Farivar
  • Jeraldine Orlina
  • Ralph W. Aye
2010 SSAT Plenary Presentation

Abstract

Introduction

Giant paraesophageal hernias (PEH) involve herniation ofstomach and/or other viscera into the mediastinum. These are usually symptomatic and commonly occur in the elderly. The benefits and risks of operating on elderly patients with giant PEH have not been clearly elucidated.

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review of consecutive patients aged 70 or greater with giant PEHs undergoing repair.Quality of life data were gathered using QOLRAD, GERD-HRQL and adysphagia severity score.

Results

Fifty-eight patients (34 females), median 78 years old, presented for repair. Nine patients presented urgently. There was no 30-day mortality. Major morbidity was 15.5%. At mean follow-up of 1.3 years, 81% were symptom free compared to baseline (p < 0.0001). Both short-term (p < 0.001) and long term QOLRAD (p < 0.001) scores improved significantly, as did GERD HRQL scores (p < 0.001). Dysphagia scores worsened in the short term but returned to baseline at long term follow up.

Conclusions

Symptomatic giant PEH in this elderly population can be repaired with symptomatic improvement, minimal morbidity and mortality in both the elective and urgent setting. The decision to operate should be made by a physician experienced in managing this complex patient population.

Keywords

Elderly Quality of life Paraesophageal hernia repair Laparoscopic Surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Luketich, J.D., et al., Outcomes after a decade of laparoscopic giant paraesophageal hernia repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010. 139(2): p. 395–404, 404 e1PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hazebroek, E.J., et al., Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: quality of life outcomes in the elderly. Dis Esophagus, 2008. 21(8): p. 737–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Polomsky, M., et al., Should elective repair of intrathoracic stomach be encouraged? J Gastrointest Surg, 2010. 14(2): p. 203–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nason, K.S., et al., Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia results in long-term patient satisfaction and a durable repair. J Gastrointest Surg, 2008. 12(12): p. 2066–75; discussion 2075–7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schieman, C. and S.C. Grondin, Paraesophageal hernia: clinical presentation, evaluation, and management controversies. Thorac Surg Clin, 2009. 19(4): p. 473–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oelschlager, B.K., et al., Biologic prosthesis reduces recurrence after laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg, 2006. 244(4): p. 481–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aye, R.W., The Hill Procedure for Gastroesophageal Reflux, in Current Therapy in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, S.C. Yang and D.E. Cameron, Editors. 2004, Mosby: Philadelphia, PA. p. 400–405.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buduhan, G., et al., The Nissen-Hill "hybrid": Pilot study of a new antireflux repair, in International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus. 2008: Budapest, Hungary.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wiklund, I.K., et al., Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia patients. Psychometric documentation of a new disease-specific questionnaire (QOLRAD). Eur J Surg Suppl, 1998(583): p. 41–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Velanovich, V., The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus, 2007. 20(2): p. 130–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dakkak, M. and J.R. Bennett, A new dysphagia score with objective validation. J Clin Gastroenterol, 1992. 14(2): p. 99–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stylopoulos, N., G.S. Gazelle, and D.W. Rattner, Paraesophageal hernias: operation or observation? Ann Surg, 2002. 236(4): p. 492–500; discussion 500–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Karmali, S., et al., Primary laparoscopic and open repair of paraesophageal hernias: a comparison of short-term outcomes. Dis Esophagus, 2008. 21(1): p. 63–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Houghton, S.G., et al., Combined transabdominal gastroplasty and fundoplication for shortened esophagus: impact on reflux-related and overall quality of life. Ann Thorac Surg, 2008. 85(6): p. 1947–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Champion, J.K. and D. Rock, Laparoscopic mesh cruroplasty for large paraesophageal hernias. Surg Endosc, 2003. 17(4): p. 551–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rathore, M.A., et al., Intermediate-term results of laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia: lack of follow-up esophagogram leads to detection bias. JSLS, 2007. 11(3): p. 344–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jobe, B.A., et al., Laparoscopic management of giant type III hiatal hernia and short esophagus. Objective follow-up at three years. J Gastrointest Surg, 2002. 6(2): p. 181–8; discussion 188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maziak, D.E., T.R. Todd, and F.G. Pearson, Massive hiatus hernia: evaluation and surgical management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 1998. 115(1): p. 53–60; discussion 61–2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian E. Louie
    • 1
  • Maurice Blitz
    • 1
  • Alexander S. Farivar
    • 1
  • Jeraldine Orlina
    • 1
  • Ralph W. Aye
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Thoracic and Foregut SurgerySwedish Cancer Institute and Medical CenterSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations