Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 184–190 | Cite as

Complex Pancreatic Surgery: Safety and Feasibility in the Community Setting

  • Ronald S. Chamberlain
  • Matthew Tichauer
  • Zachary Klaassen
  • Prakash R. Paragi
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Advances in technology, innovative surgical procedures, and enhanced perioperative care have allowed more patients to be considered for complex pancreatic surgery. Published reports on the outcomes of pancreatic surgery performed at high volume tertiary referral centers have yielded excellent results. However, similar outcome and safety data from community hospitals is limited.

Material and Methods

Consecutive complex pancreatic surgery performed by a single surgeon from December 2004 to December 2009 formed the study group. Factors analyzed included patient demographics, operative procedure, operative time, length of hospital stay, pathology, and 30-day morbidity and mortality.

Results

One hundred and nine consecutive patients underwent pancreatic surgery, with a mean patient age of 62.4 ± 15.2 years. Eighty-three patients (76.1%) underwent definitive surgical procedure and 26 patients (23.9%) had palliative bypass after failed palliative biliary stenting. The mean operative time was 229 ± 109 min, the mean length of stay was 8.6 ± 6.5 days and 24 (22.0%) patients had surgical complications.

Conclusion

Complex pancreatic surgery can be performed safely at high-volume tertiary community hospitals with excellent outcomes comparable to tertiary academic centers. In the ongoing debate about the need for mandatory referral of complex surgical procedures, tertiary community hospitals with well-determined outcomes should be included.

Keywords

Pancreatic surgery Community hospital Surgical outcomes 

References

  1. 1.
    Sener SF, Fremgen A, Menck HR, Winchester DP. Pancreatic cancer: a report of treatment and survival trends for 100,313 patients diagnosed from 1985 to 1995, using the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg 1999;189:1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birk D, Fortnagel G, Formentini A, Beger HG. Small carcinoma of the pancreas. Factors of prognostic relevance. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1998;5:450–454.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cubilla AL, Fortner J, Fitzgerald PJ. Lymph node involvement in carcinoma of the head of the pancreas area. Cancer 1978;41:880–887.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ishikawa O, Ohhigashi H, Sasaki Y, Kabuto T, Fukuda I, Furukawa H, Imaoka S, Iwanaga T. Practical usefulness of lymphatic and connective tissue clearance for the carcinoma of the pancreas head. Ann Surg 1988;208:215–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nagakawa T, Kayahara M, Ohta T, Ueno K, Konishi I, Miyazaki I. Patterns of neural and plexus invasion of human pancreatic cancer and experimental cancer. Int J Pancreatol 1991;10:113–119.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Satake K, Nishiwaki H, Yokomatsu H, Kawazoe Y, Kim K, Haku A, Umeyama K, Miyazaki I. Surgical curability and prognosis for standard versus extended resection for T1 carcinoma of the pancreas. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;175:259–265.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bramhall SR, Allum WH, Jones AG, Allwood A, Cummins C, Neoptolemos JP. Treatment and survival in 13,560 patients with pancreatic cancer, and incidence of the disease, in the West Midlands: an epidemiological study. Br Jr Surg 1995;82:111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chamberlain RS, Gupta C, Paragi P. In defense of the whipple: an argument for aggressive surgical management of pancreatic cancer. Oncologist 2009;14:586–590.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson SRG, Tosteson ANA, Sharp SM, Warshaw AL, Fisher ES. Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy. Surgery 1999;125:250–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Int Med 2002;137:511–520.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EVA, Stukel TA, Lucas L, Batista I, Welch HG, Wennberg DE. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1128–1137.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, Brennan MF. Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 1998;280:1747–1751.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Birkmeyer JD. High-risk surgery—follow the crowd. JAMA 2000;283:1191–1193.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Epstein AM. Volume and outcome—it is time to move ahead. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1161–1164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mukherjee S, Kocher HM, Hutchins RR, Bhattacharya S, Abraham AT. Impact of hospital volume on outcomes for pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single UK HPB centre experience. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009;35:734–738.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Roohan PJ, Bickell NA, Baptiste MS, Therriault GD, Ferrara EP, Siu AL. Hospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancer. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:454–457.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schrag D, Cramer LD, Bach PB, Cohen AM, Warren JL, Begg CB. Influence of hospital procedure volume on outcomes following surgery for colon cancer. JAMA 2000;284:3028–3035.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kee F, Wilson RH, Harper C, Patterson CC, McCallion K, Houston RF, Moorehead RJ, Sloan JM, Rowlands BJ. Influence of hospital and clinician workload on survival from colorectal cancer: cohort study. BMJ 1999;318:1381–1385.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Enzinger PC, Benedetti JK, Meyerhardt JA, McCoy S, Hundahl SA, Macdonald JS, Fuchs CS. Impact of hospital volume on recurrence and survival after surgery for gastric cancer. Ann Surg 2007;245:426–434.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Finlayson EV, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer JD. Hospital volume and operative mortality in cancer surgery. Arch Surg 2003;138:721–726.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hannan EL, Kilburn HJ, Bernard H, O’Donnell JF, Lukacik G, Shields EP. Coronary artery bypass surgery: the relationship factors. Med Care 1991;29:1094–1107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Koniaris L, Kaushal S, Abrams RA, Sauter PK, Coleman J, Hruban RH, Lillemoe KD. Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas−616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4:567–579.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 1988;260:1743–1748.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Trede M, Schwall G, Saeger HD. Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy: 118 consecutive resections without an operative mortality. Ann Surg 1990;211:447–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schell MT, Barcia A, Spitzer AL, Harris HW. Pancreaticoduodenectomy: volume is not associated with outcome within an academic health care system. HPB Surg 2008;2008:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA. One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 2006;244:10–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    National Cancer Guidance Steering Group. Improving outcomes in upper gastro-intestinal cancers: the manual. London: NHS Executive, Department of Health, 2000.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Meguid RA, Ahuja N, Chang, DC. What constitutes a high volume hospital for pancreatic resection? J Am Coll Surg 2008;206:622.e1-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Riall TS, Nealon WH, Goodwin JS, Townsend CM, Freeman JL. Outcomes following pancreatic resection: variability among high-volume providers. Surg 2008;144:133–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hoshal VL Jr, Benedict MB, David LR, Kulick J. Personal experience with the Whipple operation: outcomes and lessons learned. Am Surg 2004;70:121–125.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operating mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2117–2127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    The Leapfrog Group. Evidence Based Hospital Referral. Available at http://www.leapfroggroup.org/media/file/FactSheet_EBHR.pdf. Accessed on April 16, 2009.

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ronald S. Chamberlain
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Matthew Tichauer
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zachary Klaassen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Prakash R. Paragi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgerySaint Barnabas Medical CenterLivingstonUSA
  2. 2.St. George’s University School of MedicineSt. GeorgeGrenada
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryUniversity of Medicine and Dentistry of New JerseyNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations