Lymphovascular or Perineural Invasion May Predict Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With T1 and T2 Colorectal Cancer
- 311 Downloads
The aim of the study was to evaluate factors for predicting lymph node metastasis in patients who had T1 and T2 colorectal cancer.
A total of 224 patients with T1 or T2 colorectal cancers who underwent radical surgery with regional lymphadenectomy from January 1999 to January 2008 were analyzed.
Predictive factors for lymph node metastasis and prognostic factors were analyzed. Tumor stage was classified as T1 in 69 (30.8%) and T2 in 155 (69.2%) of patients. The overall incidence of lymph node metastasis was 21.0% (14.5% for T1 cancer and 23.9% for T2 cancer; P = 0.112). The node positive and negative groups were similar with regard to patient demographics, except that the former contained a significantly higher number of lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion cases. During the median follow-up period of 49 months, the 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates for patients without lymph node metastasis were 97.1% and 94.6%, which were significantly higher than the rates for those with lymph node metastasis (85.5%, P = 0.008, and 82.0%, P = 0.007, respectively). A multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node status was the only significant independent prognostic factor for both overall survival (P = 0.025) and disease-free survival (P = 0.040). Moreover, the presence of lymphovascular invasion (P < 0.001) or perineural invasion (P = 0.004) was an independent predictor for lymph node metastasis.
Lymph node metastasis was the most powerful predictor for poorer survival in patients with T1 or T2 colorectal cancer. For patients with positive lymphovascular or perineural invasion, radical surgery should be recommended because of a greater chance for lymph node metastasis.
KeywordsEarly colorectal cancer Lymph node metastasis Lymphovascular invasion Perineural invasion
This study was supported by a grant from Chonnam National University Research Institute of Medical Sciences.
- 1.Rasheed S, Bowley DM, Aziz O, Tekkis PP, Sadat AE, Guenther T, Boello ML, McDonald PJ, Talbot IC, Northover JM. Can depth of tumour invasion predict lymph node positivity in patients undergoing resection for early rectal cancer? A comparative study between T1 and T2 cancers. Colorectal Dis 2008;10:231-238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 7.Huh JW, Kim HR, Kim YJ. Anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer: the impact of fibrin glue. Am J Surg 2010;199:435-441.Google Scholar
- 10.Lee HS, Lee S, Seo JH, Kwack KK, Kim JS, Jung HC, Song IS. Follow-up results of endoscopic mucosal resection for early colorectal cancer. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 2006;22:103-112.Google Scholar
- 16.Goldstein NS, Hart J. Histologic features associated with lymph node metastasis in stage T1 and superficial T2 rectal adenocarcinomas in abdominoperineal resection specimens. Identifying a subset of patients for whom treatment with adjuvant therapy or completion abdominoperineal resection should be considered after local excision. Am J Clin Pathol 1999;111:51-58.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Huh JW, Oh BR, Kim HR, Kim YJ. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level as an independent prognostic factor in potentially curative colon cancer. J Surg Oncol 2010;101:396-400.Google Scholar
- 20.Huh JW, Kim YJ, Kim HR. Prognostic value of perineural invasion in patients with stage II colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2010. doi: 10.1245/S10434-010-0982-7