‘Slowing Down When You Should’: Initiators and Influences of the Transition from the Routine to the Effortful
- 653 Downloads
‘Slowing down when you should’ has been described as marking the transition from ‘automatic’ to ‘effortful’ functioning in professional practice. The ability to ‘slow down’ is hypothesized as an important factor in expert judgment. This study explored the nature of the ‘slowing down’ phenomenon intraoperatively and its link to surgical judgment.
Twenty-eight surgeons across different surgical specialties were interviewed from four hospitals affiliated with a large urban university. In grounded theory tradition, data were collected and analyzed in an iterative design, using a constant comparative approach. Emergent themes were identified and a conceptual framework was developed.
Surgeons recognized the ‘slowing down’ phenomenon acknowledging its link to judgment and described two main initiators. Proactively planned ‘slowing down’ moments were anticipated preoperatively from operation-specific (tying superior thyroid vessels) or patient-specific (imaging abnormality) factors. Surgeons also described situationally responsive ‘slowing down’ moments to unexpected events (encountering an adherent tumor). Surgeons described several influencing factors on the slowing down phenomenon (fatigue, confidence).
This framework for ‘slowing down’ assists in making tangible the previously elusive construct of surgical judgment, providing a vocabulary for considering the events surrounding these critical moments in surgery, essential for teaching, self-reflection, and patient safety.
KeywordsJudgment Nontechnical skills Expertise Automaticity Slowing down
This study was supported by a grant from Physicians Services Incorporated Foundation.
- 1.Schön DA. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books, 1983.Google Scholar
- 2.Schön DA. Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987.Google Scholar
- 3.Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE. Mind over machine. New York: Free, 1986.Google Scholar
- 5.Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine, 1967.Google Scholar
- 6.Charmaz K. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, eds. Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2000, pp 509–535.Google Scholar
- 7.Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1998.Google Scholar
- 9.Kelle U. Computer-aided qualitative data analysis: theory, methods and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2002.Google Scholar
- 18.Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004;10:S1–S12.Google Scholar
- 19.Kahneman D. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1973.Google Scholar
- 25.Burke K. A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969.Google Scholar