Advertisement

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 14, Issue 2, pp 323–328 | Cite as

Comparative Study between Clipless Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy by Harmonic Scalpel Versus Conventional Method: A Prospective Randomized Study

  • Tharwat Kandil
  • Ayman El Nakeeb
  • Emad El Hefnawy
Original Article

Abstract

Background

This study was planned to compare the traditional method of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) versus LC using harmonic as regard the safety and efficacy.

Material and methods

This study included group A (70 patients) in whom LC was conducted using the traditional method (TM) by clipping both cystic duct and artery and dissection of gallbladder from liver bed by diathermy, and group B (70 patients) LC was conducted using harmonic scalpel (HS) closure and division of both cystic duct and artery and dissection of gallbladder from liver bed by HS. The intraoperative and postoperative parameters were collected including duration of operation, postoperative pain, and complications.

Results

HS provides a shorter operative duration than TM (33.21 + 9.6 vs. 51.7 + 13.79, respectively, p = 0.001), with a significant less incidence of gallbladder peroration (7.1% vs. 18.6, p = 0.04) and less rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy but not reach a statistical significance. The amount of postoperative drainage is significantly less in HS (29 + 30 vs. 47.7 + 31, p = 0.001). No postoperative bile leak was encountered in HS, but it occurred in 2.9% of patients in TM. VAS in HS at 12 h postoperative was 3.25 + 1.84 vs 5.01 + 1.2 (p = 0.001) and at 24 h postoperative was 3.12 + 1.64 vs. 4.48 + 1.89 (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

HS provides a complete hemobiliary stasis and is a safe alternative to stander clip of cystic duct and artery. It provides a shorter operative duration, less incidence of gallbladder perforation, less postoperative pain, and less rate of conversion to open cholecystectomy.

Keywords

Clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy Harmonic scalple 

References

  1. 1.
    Fullarton GM, Bell G. A prospective audit of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in west of Scotland. west of Scotland laparoscopic cholecystectomy audit group. Gut 1994;35(8):1121–1126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Uchiyama K, Onishi H, Tani M, Kinoshita H, Ueno MYmanue H. Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis with cholecysteolithiasis. Hepatogastroenterology 2004;51:346–348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Toyama Y, Milyake R, Son K, Yoshida S, Usuba T. Three port laproscopic paritial hepatectomy using an ultrasonically activated devices (USAD). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2006;13:317–322.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cunniffe MG, Mc Anena OJ, Dar MA, Calleary J, Flynn N. A prospective randomized trial of intraoperative bupivacaine irrigation for management of shoulder tip pain following laparoscopy. Am J Surg 1998;176:258–261.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hardacre JM, Tallmini MA. Pulmonary and haemodynaemic changes during laparoscopy—are they important? Surgery 2000;17:241–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wills VL, Hunt DR. Pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2000;87:273–284.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rohatgi A, Widdison A. An audit of cystic duct closure in laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surg Endosc 2006;20:875–877.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yano H, Okada K, Kinuta M, Nakano Y, Tono T, Matsui S, Iwazawa T, Kanoh T, Monden T. Efficacy of absorbable clips compared with metal clips for cystic duct ligation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Today 2003;33:18–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nathanson LK, Easter DW, Cuschieri A. Ligation of the structures of the cystic pedicle during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1991;161:350–354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tang B, Hanna GB, Joice P, Cuschieri A. Identification and categorization of technical errors by Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 2004;139:1215–1220.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tucker RD. Laparoscopic electrosurgical injuries: survey results and their implications. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995;5(4):311–317.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Edelman DS, Unger SW. Bipolar versus monopolar cautery scissors for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized, prospective study. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995;5(6):459–462.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nduka CC, Super PA, Monson JR, Darzi AW. Cause and prevention of electrosurgical injuries in laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 1994;179:161–170.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Janssen IMC, Swank DJ, Boonstra O, Knipscheer BC, Klinkenbijil JH, Goor HV. Randomized, clinical trial of ultrasonic versus electrocautery dissection of the gallbladder in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2003;90:799–803.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wetter LA, Payne JH, Kirshenbaum G, Podoll EF, Bachinsky T, Way LW. The ultrasonic dissector facilitates laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg. 1992;127:1195–1199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tebala GD. Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy by harmonic dissection without cystic duct and artery clipping. Am J Surg 2006;9:718–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sietses C, Eijsbouts QAJ, Blomberg BME, Cuesta MA. Ultrasonic energy versus monopolar electrosurgery in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2001;15:69–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974:1127–1131.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Westervalt J. Clipless cholecystectomy: broadening the role of the harmonic scalpel. JSLS 2004;8:283–285.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Amaral JF, Chrosteek CA. Experimental comparison of the ultrasonically activated scalpel to electrosurgery and laser surgery for laparoscopic use. Min Invasive Ther Allied Technol 1997;6:324–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gossot D, Buess G, Cuschieri A, Leporte E, Lirici M, Marvik R, Meijer D, Melzer A, Schurr MO. Ultrasonic dissection for endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 1999;13:412–417.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Huscher CGS, Lirici MM, Di Paola M, Crafa F, Napolitano C, Mereu A, Recher A, Corradi A, Amini M. laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection without cystic duct and artery ligature. Surg Endosc 2003;17:442–451.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Miroshnik M, Saafan A, Koh S, Farlow J, Neophyton J, Lizzio, Yee F, Ethell T, Bean A, Fenton-Lee D. Biliary tract injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a single unit. ANZ J Surg 2002;72:867–870.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wise US, Glick GL, Landeros M. Cystic duct leak after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a multiinstitutional study. Surg Endosc 1996;10:1189–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hanazaki K, Igarashi J, Sodeyama H, Matsuda Y. Bile leakage resulting from clip displacement of the cystic duct stump: a potential pitfall of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1999;13:168–171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nelson TM, Nakashima M, Mulvihill SJ. How secure are laparoscopically placed clips? Arch Surg 1992;127:718–720.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McMahon AJ, Fullarton G, Baxter JN, O’Dwyer PJ. Bile duct injury and bile leakage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1995;82:307–313.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Reis LD. Surgical clips incorporated into a duodenal ulcer: a rare complication after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 2000;32:S3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Labuski MR, Wise SW. Recurrent abdominal abscess secondary to a dropped laparoscopic clip: CT imaging. Abdom Imaging 1999;24:191–192.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jorgensen J, Gillies RB, Hunt DR, Caplehorn JR, Lumely T. A simple and effective way to reduce postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Aust NZJ 1995;65:466–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Libermann MA, Howe S, Lane M. Ondansetron versus placebo for prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 2000;179:60–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fredman B, Jedeikin R, Olsfanger D, Flor P, Gruzman A. Residual pneumoperitoneum: a cause of postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 1994;79:152–154.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sharma RR, Axelsson H, Oberg A, Jansson E, Clergue F. Diaphragmatic activity after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesthesiology 1999;91:406–413.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Windberge UB, Auer R, Keplinnger F, Langle F, Heinze G, Losert UM. The role of intraabdominal pressure on splanchnic and pulmonary haemodynaemic and metabolic changes during CO2 pneumoperitoneum. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:84–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wallace DH, Serpell MG, Baxter JN, O’Dwyer PJ. Randomized trial of different insufflations pressure for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 1997;84:455–458.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tharwat Kandil
    • 1
  • Ayman El Nakeeb
    • 2
  • Emad El Hefnawy
    • 3
  1. 1.Gastroenterology Surgical Center, Faculty of MedicineMansoura UniversityMansouraEgypt
  2. 2.Mansoura University General Hospital, Surgical Departement 8, Faculty of MedicineMansoura UniversityMansouraEgypt
  3. 3.Department of AnasthesiaMansoura UniversityMansouraEgypt

Personalised recommendations