Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Programs for Patients Having Colorectal Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials
- First Online:
- 1.4k Downloads
Enhanced recovery after surgery programs have been introduced with aims of improving patient care, reducing complication rates, and shortening hospital stay following colorectal surgery. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine whether enhanced recovery after surgery programs, when compared to traditional perioperative care, are associated with reduced primary hospital length of stay in adult patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, and the reference lists were searched for relevant articles. Only randomized controlled trials comparing an enhanced recovery program with traditional postoperative care were included.
Three of four included studies showed significantly shorter primary lengths of stay for patients enrolled in enhanced recovery programs. There was no significant difference in postoperative mortality when the two groups were compared [relative risk (RR) = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.12–2.38; test for heterogeneity, p = 0.40 and I2 = 0], and patients in enhanced recovery programs were less likely to develop postoperative complications (RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.42–0.88; test for heterogeneity, p = 0.95 and I2 = 0).
There is some evidence to suggest that enhanced recovery after surgery programs are better than traditional perioperative care, but evidence from a larger, better quality randomized controlled trial is necessary.
KeywordsEnhanced recovery after surgery Colorectal surgery Meta-analysis Postoperative complications
- 6.Nelson R, Edwards S, Tse B. Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, July 2007, issue 3:CD004929.Google Scholar
- 7.Guenaga KF, Matos D, Castro AA, Atallah AN, Wille-Jorgensen P. Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, January 2005, issue 1:CD001544.Google Scholar
- 8.Basse L, Raskov HH, Hjort Jakobsen D, Sonne E, Billesbolle P, Hendel HW et al. Accelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition. Br J Surg 2002;89:446–453. doi:10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.02044.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Harris PH, Helfand M, Woolf SH, Lohr KN, Mulrow CD, Teutsch SM, Methods Work Group, Third US Preventive Services Task Force et al. Current methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. Am J Prev Med 2001;20(3S):21–35. doi:10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00261-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW. Prospective, randomised, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46(7):851–859. doi:10.1007/s10350-004-6672-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Khoo CK, Vickery CJ, Forsyth N, Vinall NS, Eyre-Brook IA. A prospective randomised controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer. Ann Surg 2007;245(6):867–872. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000259219.08209.36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar