Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 12, Issue 8, pp 1446–1451 | Cite as

Recurrence and Quality of Life Following Perineal Proctectomy for Rectal Prolapse

  • Sean C. Glasgow
  • Elisa H. Birnbaum
  • Ira J. Kodner
  • James W. FleshmanJr.
  • David W. DietzEmail author



Surgical outcome and quality of life (QOL) following perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse remain poorly documented.


From 1994 to 2004, patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse were treated exclusively with perineal proctectomy independent of age or comorbidities. Subjective patient assessments and recurrences were determined retrospectively from hospital and clinic records. Consenting patients completed the gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI).


Perineal proctectomy was performed in 103 consecutive patients with a median age of 75 years (range 30–94). Most patients underwent concurrent levatorplasty (anterior 85.8%, posterior 67.9%). Durable results were obtained in all patients; the recurrence rate was 8.5% over a mean follow-up of 36 months. Preoperatively, 75.5% of patients reported fecal incontinence, and 32.1% had obstructed defecation. Incontinence significantly improved post-proctectomy (41.5%, p < 0.001), as did constipation (10.4%, p < 0.001). GIQLI respondents reported satisfaction following proctectomy with 63% scoring within one standard deviation of healthy controls. Patients with recurrent prolapse reported a lower QOL. Risk factors for recurrence included duration of prolapse, need for posterior levatorplasty, and prior anorectal surgery.


Perineal proctectomy provides significant relief from fecal incontinence and obstructive symptoms caused by rectal prolapse, with an acceptable recurrence rate and low morbidity.


Procidentia Rectal prolapse Proctectomy Quality of life Incontinence 



The authors appreciate the assistance of Ken Schechtman, PhD, for statistical analysis and interpretation.


  1. 1.
    Altemeier WA, Culbertson WR, Schowengerdt C, Hunt J. Nineteen years’ experience with the one-stage perineal repair of rectal prolapse. Ann Surg 1971;173:993–1006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown AJ, Anderson JH, McKee RF, Finlay IG. Strategy for selection of type of operation for rectal prolapse based on clinical criteria. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:103–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Purkayastha S, Tekkis P, Athanasiou T, Aziz O, Paraskevas P, Ziprin P et al. A comparison of open vs. laparoscopic abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: A meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1930–1940.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kariv Y, Delaney CP, Casillas S, Hammel J, Nocero J, Bast J et al. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal prolapse: A case-control study. Surg Endosc 2006;20:35–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bachoo P, Brazzelli M, Grant A. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000:CD001758.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schoetz DJ. Evolving practice patterns in colon and rectal surgery. J Am Coll Surg 2006;203:322–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Birnbaum EH, Stamm L, Rafferty JF, Fry RD, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency influences surgical outcome in treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:1215–1221.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Williams JG, Wong WD, Jensen L, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Incontinence and rectal prolapse: a prospective manometric study. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:209–216.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glasgow SC, Birnbaum EH, Kodner IJ, Fleshman JW, Dietz DW. Preoperative anal manometry predicts continence after perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:1052–1058.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kimmins MH, Evetts BK, Isler J, Billingham R. The Altemeier repair: Outpatient treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:565–570.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Williams JG, Rothenberger DA, Madoff RD, Goldberg SM. Treatment of rectal prolapse in the elderly by perineal rectosigmoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1992;35:830–834.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prasad ML, Pearl RK, Abcarian H, Orsay CP, Nelson RL. Perineal proctectomy, posterior rectopexy, and postanal levator repair for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:547–552.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eypasch E, Williams JI, Wood-Dauphinee S, Ure BM, Schmulling C et al. Gastrointestinal quality of life index: Development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg 1995;82:216–222.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sailer M, Bussen D, Debus ES, Fuchs KH, Thiede A. Quality of life in patients with benign anorectal disorders. Br J Surg 1999;85:1716–1719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    FitzHarris GP, Garcia-Aguilar J, Parker SC, Bullard KM, Madoff RD, Goldberg SM et al. Quality of life after subtotal colectomy for slow-transit constipation: Both quality and quantity count. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:433–440.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Decker G, Borie F, Bouamrirene D, Veyrac M, Guillon F, Fingerhut A et al. Gastrointestinal quality of life before and after laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial posterior fundoplication. Ann Surg 2002;236:750–758.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goldberg SM, Gordon PH. Operative treatment of complete prolapse of the rectum. In Najarian JS, Delaney JP, eds. Surgery of the Gastrointestinal Tract. New York: Intercontinental Medical Book, 1974, pp 423–429.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim DS, Tsang CB, Wong WD, Lowry AC, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. Complete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:460–466.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Azimuddin K, Khubchandani IT, Rosen L, Stasik JJ, Riether RD, Reed JF. Rectal prolapse: A search for the “best” operation. Am Surg 2001;67:622–627.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lim JF, Ho YH. Total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis leads to appreciable loss in quality of life irrespective of primary diagnosis. Tech Coloproctol 2001;5:79–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dvorkin LS, Chan CL, Knowles CH, Williams NS, Lunniss PJ, Scott SM. Anal sphincter morphology in patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:198–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karulf RE, Madoff RD, Goldberg SM. Rectal prolapse. Curr Probl Surg 2001;38:771–832.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Metcalf AM, Loening-Baucke V. Anorectal function and defecation dynamics in patients with rectal prolapse. Am J Surg 1988;155:206–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sean C. Glasgow
    • 1
  • Elisa H. Birnbaum
    • 1
  • Ira J. Kodner
    • 1
  • James W. FleshmanJr.
    • 1
  • David W. Dietz
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Section of Colon and Rectal SurgeryWashington University School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Colorectal SurgeryCleveland ClinicClevelandUSA

Personalised recommendations