Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 11, Issue 9, pp 1126–1133 | Cite as

Esophageal Manometry and Clinical Outcome After Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication

  • Huiqi Yang
  • David I. WatsonEmail author
  • Jamie Kelly
  • Carolyn J. Lally
  • Jennifer C. Myers
  • Glyn G. Jamieson



The outcome after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication can be assessed by either clinical symptoms or objective tests. Outcomes from objective tests are often held in higher regard than clinical data when determining the merits, or otherwise, of various antireflux surgery procedures. In this study, we sought to determine whether there is a relationship between postoperative symptoms and parameters measured by esophageal manometry to determine whether early postoperative esophageal manometry is a useful investigation for the routine assessment of post fundoplication outcome.


One hundred and forty-three patients who had undergone a laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication, clinical follow-up at 3 months and 5 years after surgery, and esophageal manometry at 3 months after fundoplication as part of routine follow-up in 1 of 5 clinical trials were studied. Nineteen of these patients also underwent manometry 5 years after fundoplication. Postoperative symptoms were prospectively determined by applying a standardized questionnaire, which assessed dysphagia, heartburn, bloat symptoms, and overall satisfaction using analog scales. Patients were classified into different groups according to the analog scores for clinical symptoms. Correlations between clinical and postoperative manometry outcomes were sought.


No significant associations were found between parameters measured by esophageal manometry (lower esophageal sphincter resting and residual relaxation pressures, peristaltic amplitude and normal peristaltic propagation) and clinical parameters (dysphagia, heartburn, bloating, and overall satisfaction) for all time points—3 months postoperative manometry vs symptoms at 3 months and 5 years, 5 years postoperative manometry vs symptoms at 5 years, except for a weak (r = −0.17, p = 0.042) correlation between the percentage of successfully propagated swallows at 3 months and dysphagia for solids at 5 years.


Postoperative esophageal manometry parameters at 3 months and 5 years after surgery were not associated with any clinically important differences in the postoperative symptoms of heartburn, dysphagia, bloat or with overall satisfaction with the surgical outcome. The routine use of esophageal manometry to assess the outcome after Nissen fundoplication does not predict clinical outcome.


Esophageal manometry Clinical outcome Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication 


  1. 1.
    Watson DI. Laparoscopic treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2004;18:19–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lafullarde T, Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Myers JC, Game PA, Devitt PG. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: five-year results and beyond. Arch Surg 2001;136:180–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bammer T, Hinder RA, Klaus A, Klingler PJ. Five- to eight-year outcome of the first laparoscopic Nissen fundoplications. J Gastrointest Surg 2001;5:42–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prochazka V, Kala Z, Kroupa R, Kysela P, Izakovicova HL, Dolina J. Could the peroperative manometry of the oesophagus be used for prediction of dysphagia following antireflux procedures? Rozhl Chir 2005;84(1):7–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Booth M, Stratford J, Dehn TC. Preoperative esophageal motility does not influence the outcome of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dis Esophagus 2002;15:57–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Boyle CJ, Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Myers JC, Game PA, Devitt PG. Division of short gastric vessels at laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication: a prospective double-blind randomized trial with 5-year follow-up. Ann Surg 2002;235:165–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ludemann R, Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Game PA, Devitt PG. Five-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic total versus anterior 180 degrees fundoplication. Br J Surg 2005;92:240–243.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Devitt PG, Kennedy A, Ellis T, Ackroyd R, Lafullarde T, Game PA. A prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with anterior versus posterior hiatal repair. Arch Surg 2001;136:745–751.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Lally C, Archer S, Bessell JR, Booth M, Cade R, Cullingford G, Devitt PG, Fletcher DR, Hurley J, Kiroff G, Martin C, Martin IJG, Nathanson LK, Windsor J, International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus—Australasian Section. Multicenter, prospective, double-blind, randomized trial of laparoscopic Nissen vs anterior 90 degrees partial fundoplication. Arch Surg 2004;139:1160–1167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spence GM, Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Lally CJ, Devitt PG. Single center prospective randomized trial of laparoscopic Nissen versus anterior 90 degrees partial fundoplication. J Gastrointest Surg 2006;10:698–705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jamieson GG, Watson DI, Britten-Jones R, Mitchell PC, Anvari M. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Ann Surg 1994;220:137–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anvari M, Allen C. Esophageal and lower esophageal sphincter pressure profiles 6 and 24 months after laparoscopic fundoplication and their association with postoperative dysphagia. Surg Endosc 1998;12:421–426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anderson J, Myers JC, Watson DI, Gabb M, Mathew G, Jamieson GG. Concurrent fluoroscopy and manometry reveal differences in laparoscopic Nissen and anterior fundoplication. Dig Dis Sci 1998;43;847–853.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goodall RJR, Temple JG. Effect of Nissen fundoplication on competence of the gastro-oesophageal junction. Gut 1980;21:607–613.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    DeMeester TR, Bonavina L, Albertucci M. Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Evaluation of primary repair in 100 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 1986;204:9–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Baigrie RJ, Cullis SN, Ndhluni AJ, Cariem A. Randomized double-blind trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication versus anterior partial fundoplication. Br J Surg 2005;92:819–823.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Watson DI, Jamieson GG, Pike GK, Davies N, Richardson M, Devitt PG. A prospective randomised double-blind trial between laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication and anterior partial fundoplication. Br J Surg 1999;86:123–130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mathew G, Watson DI, Myers JC, Holloway RH, Jamieson GG. Oesophageal motility before and after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 1997;84:1465–1469.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ludemann R, Watson DI, Jamieson GG. Influence of follow-up methodology and completeness on apparent clinical outcome of fundoplication. Am J Surg 2003;186:143–147.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cole SJ, van den Bogaerde JB, van der Walt H. Preoperative esophageal manometry does not predict postoperative dysphagia following anti-reflux surgery. Dis Esophagus 2005;18:51–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huiqi Yang
    • 1
  • David I. Watson
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jamie Kelly
    • 1
    • 2
  • Carolyn J. Lally
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jennifer C. Myers
    • 2
  • Glyn G. Jamieson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryFlinders University, Room 3D211, Flinders Medical CentreBedford Park, AdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Royal Adelaide HospitalUniversity of Adelaide Discipline of SurgeryAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations