Advertisement

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

, Volume 11, Issue 9, pp 1120–1125 | Cite as

Laparoscopic and Open Distal Pancreatic Resection for Benign Pancreatic Disease

  • Swee H. Teh
  • Daniel Tseng
  • Brett C. Sheppard
Article

Abstract

The aim of the study is to provide comparisons of the perioperative outcomes between open and laparoscopic distal pancreatic resection (DPR) for benign pancreatic disease. From 2002 and 2005, there were 28 patients (16 open, 12 laparoscopic) with a mean age of 52 who had presumptive diagnoses of benign pancreatic lesions. Pathology was neuroendocrine tumor (nine and five), mucinous cystic neoplasm (three and three), symptomatic pancreatic pseudocyst (two and two), and others (two and two). The mean operative time was 278 vs 212 min (p = 0.05), the estimated blood lost was 609 vs 193 ml (p = 0.01), and the success rate of preoperative intent for splenic preservation was 17 vs 62% (p = 0.08) in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. Two patients (16%) were converted to an open procedure. There was no perioperative mortality. The mean hospital stay and total perioperative morbidity were 10.6 vs 6.2 days (p = 0.001) and nine vs two events (p = 0.03) in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. Ten of 12 patients (83%) with laparoscopic DPR had adequate oral intake within 72 h post operatively in contrast to 2 of 16 (12.5%) patients in the open DPR group (p = 0.0001). Laparoscopic DPR is technically feasible, safe, and associated with less perioperative morbidity and a shorter hospital stay than open DPR. In centers with the appropriate expertise, laparoscopic DPR should be considered the procedure of choice for putative benign lesions of the pancreatic body and tail.

Keywords

Laparoscopic Pancreatic resection Pancreatic tumor Outcomes 

References

  1. 1.
    John TG, Greig JD, Carter DC, Garden OJ. Carcinoma of the pancreatic head and periampullary region. Tumor staging with laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography. Ann Surg. 1995;221(2):156–164 (Feb).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hochwald SN, Weiser MR, Colleoni R, Brennan MF, Conlon KC. Laparoscopy predicts metastatic disease and spares laparotomy in selected patients with pancreatic nonfunctioning islet cell tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8(3):249–253 (Apr).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Menack MJ, Arregui ME. Laparoscopic sonography of the biliary tree and pancreas. Surg Clin North Am. 2000;80(4):1151–1170 (Review, Aug).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ackroyd R, Watson DI, Majeed AW, Troy G, Treacy PJ, Stoddard CJ. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 2004;91(8):975–982 (Aug).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004 13;350(20):2050–2059 (May).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kercher KW, Novitsky YW, Park A, Matthews BD, Litwin DE, Heniford BT. Laparoscopic curative resection of pheochromocytomas. Ann Surg 2005;241(6):919–926 (discussion 926–8, Jun).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B. A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. Am J Surg 1995;169(2):208–212 (discussion 212–3, Feb).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cordera F, Long KH, Nagorney DM et al. Open versus laparoscopic splenectomy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: clinical and economic analysis. Surgery 2003;134(1):45–52 (Jul).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Sroka M et al. Laparoscopic assisted live donor nephrectomy—a comparison with the open approach. Transplantation 1997;63(2):229–233 (Jan 27).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gagner M, Pomp A, Herrera MF. Early experience with laparoscopic resections of islet cell tumors. Surgery 1996;120(6):1051–1054 (Dec).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cuschieri A, Jakimowicz JJ, van Spreeuwel J. Laparoscopic distal 70% pancreatectomy and splenectomy for chronic pancreatitis. Ann Surg 1996;223(3):280–285 (Mar).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Park AE, Heniford BT. Therapeutic laparoscopy of the pancreas. Ann Surg 2002;236(2):149–158 (Aug).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mabrut JY, Fernandez-Cruz L, Azagra JS et al. Laparoscopic pancreatic resection: results of a multicenter European study of 127 patients. Surgery 2005;137(6):597–605 (Jun).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ammori BJ, El-Dhuwaib Y, Ballester P, Augustine T. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Hepatogastroenterology 2005;52(62):620–624 (Mar–Apr).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fernandez-Cruz L, Martinez I, Gilabert R, Cesar-Borges G, Astudillo E, Navarro S. Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy combined with preservation of the spleen for cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8(4):493–501 (May–Jun).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fernandez-Cruz L, Saenz A, Astudillo E, Pantoja JP, Uzcategui E, Navarro S. Laparoscopic pancreatic surgery in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Surg Endosc 2002;16(6):996–1003 (Jun).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tseng D, Sheppard BC, Hunter JG. New approaches to the minimally invasive treatment of pancreatic cancer. Cancer J 2005;11(1):43–51 (Review, Jan–Feb).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dulucq JL, Wintringer P, Stabilini C, Feryn T, Perissat J, Mahajna A. Are major laparoscopic pancreatic resections worthwhile? A prospective study of 32 patients in a single institution. Surg Endosc 2005;19(8):1028–1034 (May 26).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fernandez-Cruz L, Saenz A, Astudillo E et al. Outcome of laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: endocrine and nonendocrine tumors. World J Surg 2002;26(8):1057–1065 (2002 May 21, Aug).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lillemoe KD, Kaushal S, Cameron JL, Sohn TA, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ. Distal pancreatectomy: indications and outcomes in 235 patients. Ann Surg 1999;229(5):693–698 (discussion 698–700, May).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Suzuki Y, Fujino Y, Tanioka Y et al. Randomized clinical trial of ultrasonic dissector or conventional division in distal pancreatectomy for non-fibrotic pancreas. Br J Surg 1999;86(5):608–611 (May).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bilimoria MM, Cormier JN, Mun Y, Lee JE, Evans DB, Pisters PW. Pancreatic leak after left pancreatectomy is reduced following main pancreatic duct ligation. Br J Surg 2003;90(2):190–196 (Feb).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ohwada S, Ogawa T, Tanahashi Y et al. Fibrin glue sandwich prevents pancreatic fistula following distal pancreatectomy. World J Surg 1998;22(5):494–498 (May).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rosen M, Walsh RM, Goldblum JR. Application of a new collagen-based sealant for the treatment of pancreatic injury. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2004;14(4):181–185 (Aug).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Swee H. Teh
    • 1
  • Daniel Tseng
    • 1
  • Brett C. Sheppard
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery-L223AOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations