Advertisement

Japanese Journal of Radiology

, Volume 37, Issue 8, pp 590–596 | Cite as

Cinematic rendering: a new imaging approach for ulcerative colitis

  • Jun Yang
  • Xu Liu
  • Chengde Liao
  • Qinqing LiEmail author
  • Dan HanEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

Cinematic rendering (CR) is a new technique for visualizing volumetric three-dimensional data. The purpose of this study was to investigate the added value of CR to conventional computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis and evaluation of ulcerative colitis (UC).

Materials and methods

We retrospectively evaluated the CT data of 48 patients (33 men, 15 women; mean age, 44.35 years) with a definitive diagnosis of UC. All patients underwent conventional CT and CR, and had colonoscopy results. Two radiologists independently reviewed the conventional CT images first without and then with CR. Then, the imaging value of CR was evaluated by both radiologists together. The readers were blinded to the disease extent. The diagnostic performance of CR for both readers was assessed by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

There were 23 cases of mild to moderate UC and 25 cases of severe UC, which were divided into two groups. Both readers showed improved diagnostic performance with the addition of CR (the area under the ROC curve improved from 0.676 to 0.804, P = 0.0255, and from 0.679 to 0.826, P = 0.0049, for readers 1 and 2, respectively). Full view of the lesion and contrast enhancement was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). Increased mesenteric vascularity and the comb sign on CR were more clearly observed in the severe group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Adding CR to conventional CT improved the diagnostic performance of evaluating the extent of UC.

Keywords

Cinematic rendering Ulcerative colitis Three-dimensional Computed tomography 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dianke Du for his help in the process of CR construction.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81703155 and 81460264), the Yunnan Applied Basic Research Projects-KMU Joint Special Project (Grant No. 2017FE468 (-071)) and Yunnan Health Training Project of High Level Talents (H-2017005).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This research carried out in accordance with the ethical standards our institutional committee. This was a retrospective, single-center study approved by our institutional review board, and the requirement for informed written consent was waived.

References

  1. 1.
    Panes J, Jairath V, Levesque BG. Advances in use of endoscopy, radiology, and biomarkers to monitor inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(2):362–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pouillon L, Laurent V, Pouillon M, Bossuyt P, Bonifacio C, Danese S, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI in inflammatory bowel disease. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;3(6):433–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goertz RS, Klett D, Wildner D, Atreya R, Neurath MF, Strobel D. Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound for monitoring vedolizumab therapy in inflammatory bowel disease patients: a pilot study. Acta Radiol. 2018;59(10):1149–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li Y, Hauenstein K. New imaging techniques in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases. Viszeralmedizin. 2015;31(4):227–34.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chiorean MV, Sandrasegaran K, Saxena R, Maglinte DD, Nakeeb A, Johnson CS. Correlation of CT enteroclysis with surgical pathology in Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102(11):2541–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schmidt S, Lepori D, Meuwly JY, Duvoisin B, Meuli R, Michetti P, et al. Prospective comparison of MR enteroclysis with multidetector spiral-CT enteroclysis: interobserver agreement and sensitivity by means of “sign-by-sign” correlation. Eur Radiol. 2003;13(6):1303–11.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Horsthuis K, Bipat S, Bennink RJ, Stoker J. Inflammatory bowel disease diagnosed with US, MR, scintigraphy, and CT: meta-analysis of prospective studies. Radiology. 2008;247(1):64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Panes J, Bouhnik Y, Reinisch W, Stoker J, Taylor SA, Baumgart DC, et al. Imaging techniques for assessment of inflammatory bowel disease: joint ECCO and ESGAR evidence-based consensus guidelines. J Crohn’s Colitis. 2013;7(7):556–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang J, Li K, Deng H, Feng J, Fei Y, Jin Y, et al. CT cinematic rendering for pelvic primary tumor photorealistic visualization. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2018;8(8):804–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Johnson PT, Schneider R, Lugo-Fagundo C, Johnson MB, Fishman EK. MDCT angiography with 3D rendering: a novel cinematic rendering algorithm for enhanced anatomic detail. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(2):309–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chu LC, Johnson PT, Fishman EK. Cinematic rendering of pancreatic neoplasms: preliminary observations and opportunities. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018;43(11):3009–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Satsangi J, Silverberg MS, Vermeire S, Colombel JF. The Montreal classification of inflammatory bowel disease: controversies, consensus, and implications. Gut. 2006;55(6):749–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    D’Haens G, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Geboes K, Hanauer SB, Irvine EJ, et al. A review of activity indices and efficacy end points for clinical trials of medical therapy in adults with ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(2):763–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ordás I, Rimola J, García-Bosch O, Rodríguez S, Gallego M, Etchevers MJ, Pellisé M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance colonography for the evaluation of disease activity and severity in ulcerative colitis: a prospective study. Gut. 2013;62(11):1566–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Govani SM, Higgins PDR, Rubenstein JH, Stidham RW, Waljee AK. CT utilization abruptly increases at age 18 among patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in the hospital. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(3):e0195022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Comaniciu D, Engel K, Georgescu B, Mansi T. Shaping the future through innovations: from medical imaging to precision medicine. Med Image Anal. 2016;33:19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rowe SP, Chu LC, Fishman EK. Cinematic rendering of small bowel pathology: preliminary observations from this novel 3D CT visualization method. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018;43(11):2928-37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Glemser PA, Engel K, Simons D, Steffens J, Schlemmer HP, Orakcioglu B. A new approach for photorealistic visualization of rendered computed tomography images. World Neurosurg. 2018;114:e283–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eid M, De Cecco CN, Nance JW Jr, Caruso D, Albrecht MH, Spandorfer AJ, et al. Cinematic rendering in CT: a novel, lifelike 3D visualization technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(2):370–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Park MJ, Lim JS. Computed tomography enterography for evaluation of inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Endosc. 2013;46(4):327–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Radiological Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityYunnan Cancer HospitalKunmingPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Medical ImagingThe First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical UniversityKunmingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations