Advertisement

Japanese Journal of Radiology

, Volume 36, Issue 8, pp 489–499 | Cite as

Differentiating malignant from benign hyperintense nodules on unenhanced T1-weighted images in patients with chronic liver disease: using gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging

  • Ji Yoon Moon
  • Seong Hyun KimEmail author
  • Seo-Youn Choi
  • Jeong Ah Hwang
  • Ji Eun Lee
  • Jisun Lee
Original Article
  • 153 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI for distinguishing malignant from benign hyperintense nodules on unenhanced T1-weighted images (T1WIs) in patients with chronic liver disease.

Materials and methods

Forty-two patients with 37 malignant and 41 benign hyperintense nodules on unenhanced T1WIs who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced and DW MRI, followed by histopathological examination, were included. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted. Significant findings on univariate and multivariate analyses were identified and their diagnostic performances were analyzed for predicting hyperintense hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs).

Results

In univariate analysis, hyperintensity on T2WI, arterial enhancement, washout, hypointensity on hepatobiliary phase, and diffusion restriction were more frequently observed (P < 0.05) in hyperintense HCCs. Tumor-to-liver SI ratio on hepatobiliary phase and minimum apparent diffusion coefficient (ADCmin) were significantly lower in hyperintense HCCs (P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, hyperintensity on T2WI (OR, 13.58; P = 0.02), arterial enhancement (OR, 8.21; P = 0.002), and ADCmin ≤ 0.83 × 10−3 mm2/s (OR, 6.88; P = 0.008) were independently significant factors for predicting hyperintense HCCs. When two of three criteria were combined, 75.7% (28/37) of hyperintense HCCs were identified with a specificity of 92.7%, and when all three criteria were satisfied, the specificity was 97.6%.

Conclusion

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced and DW MRI may be helpful for differentiating malignant from benign hyperintense nodules on unenhanced T1WI.

Keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging Hepatocellular carcinoma Apparent diffusion coefficient 

Abbreviations

DW

Diffusion weighted

T1WI

T1-weighted image

T2WI

T2-weighted image

SI

Signal intensity

CEI

Contrast enhancement index

ADC

Apparent diffusion coefficient

OR

Odds ratio

MR

Magnetic resonance

HCC

Hepatocellular carcinoma

AFP

Alpha-fetoprotein

ROI

Region of interest

ROC

Receiver operating characteristic

PPV

Positive predictive value

NPV

Negative predictive value

Notes

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

References

  1. 1.
    Matsui O, Kadoya M, Kameyama T, Yoshikawa J, Arai K, Gabata T, et al. Adenomatous hyperplastic nodules in the cirrhotic liver: differentiation from hepatocellular carcinoma with MR imaging. Radiology. 1989;173:123–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Choi BI, Takayasu K, Han MC. Small hepatocellular carcinomas and associated nodular lesions of the liver: pathology, pathogenesis, and imaging findings. Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160:1177–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dodd GD, Baron RL, Oliver JH, Federle MP. Spectrum of imaging findings of the liver in end-stage cirrhosis: part II, focal abnormalities. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:1185–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ebara M, Fukuda H, Kojima Y, Morimoto N, Yoshikawa M, Sugiura N, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinoma: relationship of signal intensity to histopathologic findings and metal content of the tumor and surrounding hepatic parenchyma. Radiology. 1999;210:81–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shimizu A, Ito K, Sasaki K, Hayashida M, Tanabe M, Shimizu K, et al. Small hyperintense hepatic lesions on T1-weighted images in patients with cirrhosis: evaluation with serial MRI and imaging features for clinical benignity. Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:1430–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu JS, Lee JH, Park MS, Kim KW. Hyperintense nodules on non-enhanced T1-weighted gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of cirrhotic liver: fate and clinical implications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006;24:630–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu JS, Kim YH, Rofsky NM. Dynamic subtraction magnetic resonance imaging of cirrhotic liver: assessment of high signal intensity lesions on nonenhanced T1-weighted images. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2005;29:51–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Tsukamoto T, Nakajima H, Mori K, Minami M. Diffusion-weighted imaging of surgically resected hepatocellular carcinoma: imaging characteristics and relationship among signal intensity, apparent diffusion coefficient, and histopathologic grade. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:438–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Parikh T, Drew SJ, Lee VS, Wong S, Hecht EM, Babb JS, et al. Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging. Radiology. 2008;246:812–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nakanishi M, Chuma M, Hige S, Omatsu T, Yokoo H, Nakanishi K, et al. Relationship between diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and histological tumor grading of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:1302–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    International Working Party. Terminology of nodular hepatocellular lesions. Hepatology. 1995;22:983–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kojiro M, Wanless IR, Alves V, et al. Pathologic diagnosis of early hepatocellular carcinoma: a report of the international consensus group for hepatocellular neoplasia. Hepatology. 2009;49:658–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Song KD, Kim SH, Lee J, Kang KA, Kim J, Yoo H. Half-dose gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging in patients at risk for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:378–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ebara M, Watanabe S, Kita K, Yoshikawa M, Sugiura N, Ohto M, et al. MR imaging of small hepatocellular carcinoma: effect of intratumoral copper content on signal intensity. Radiology. 1991;180:617–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shinmura R, Matsui O, Kobayashi S, Terayama N, Sanada J, Ueda K, et al. Cirrhotic nodules: association between MR imaging signal intensity and intranodular blood supply. Radiology. 2005;237:512–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chou CT, Chen YL, Wu HK, Chen RC. Characterization of hyperintense nodules on precontrast T1-weighted MRI: utility of gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatocyte-phase imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;33:625–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li CS, Chen RC, Lii JM, Chen WT, Shih LS, Zhang TA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging appearance of well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006;30:597–603.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Curvo-Semedo L, Brito JB, Seco MF, Costa JF, Marques CB, Caseiro-Alves F. The hypointense liver lesion on T2-weighted MR images and what it means. Radiographics. 2010;30:e38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krinsky GA, Theise ND, Rofsky NM, Mizrachi H, Tepperman LW, Weinreb JC. Dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic liver: arterial phase enhancement at CT and MR imaging—a case report. Radiology. 1998;209:461–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lim JH, Cho JM, Kim EY, Park CK. Dysplastic nodules in liver cirrhosis: evaluation of hemodynamics with CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography. Radiology. 2000;214:869–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yu JS, Rofsky NM. Dynamic subtraction MR imaging of the liver: advantages and pitfalls. Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:1351–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mannelli L, Kim S, Hajdu CH, Babb JS, Clark TWI, Taouli B. Assessment of tumor necrosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after chemoembolization: diffusion-weighted and contrast-enhanced MRI with histopathologic correlation of the explanted liver. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1044–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nishie A, Tajima T, Asayama Y, Ishigami K, Kakihara D, Nakayama T, et al. Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:e29–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bruegel M, Holzapfel K, Gaa J, Woertler K, Waldt S, Kiefer B, et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions by ADC measurements using a respiratory triggered diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar MR imaging technique. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:477–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Padhani AR, Liu G, Mu-Koh D, Chenevert TL, Thoeny HC, Takahara T, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia (New York). 2009;11:102–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hardie AD, Kizziah MK, Boulter DJ. Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted MRI for identifying hepatocellular carcinoma with liver explant correlation. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2011;55:362–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lee MH, Kim SH, Park MJ, Park CK, Rhim H. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MRI and high-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging to distinguish well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas from benign nodules in patients with chronic liver disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W868–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Muhi A, Ichikawa T, Motosugi U, Sano K, Matsuda M, Kitamura T, et al. High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of hepatocellular lesions: estimation of grade of malignancy of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30:1005–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ahn SS, Kim MJ, Lim JS, Hong HS, Chung YE, Choi JY. Added value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MR imaging in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiology. 2010;255:459–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yu MH, Kim JH, Yoon JH, Kim HC, Chung JW, Han JK, et al. Small (≤ 1 cm) hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic performance and imaging features at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2014;271:748–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Golfieri R, Renzulli M, Lucidi V, Corcioni B, Trevisani F, Bolondi L. Contribution of the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI to Dynamic MRI in the detection of hypovascular small (≤ 2 cm) HCC in cirrhosis. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1233–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kogita S, Imai Y, Okada M, Kim T, Onishi H, Takamura M, et al. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance images of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histological grading and portal blood flow. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:2405–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Goncalves Neto JA, Altun E, Elazzazi M, Vaidean GD, Chaney M, Semelka RC. Enhancement of abdominal organs on hepatic arterial phase: quantitative comparison between 1.5- and 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;28:47–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Radiological Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ji Yoon Moon
    • 1
  • Seong Hyun Kim
    • 2
    Email author
  • Seo-Youn Choi
    • 3
  • Jeong Ah Hwang
    • 4
  • Ji Eun Lee
    • 3
  • Jisun Lee
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Kangdong Seong-Sim HospitalHallym University College of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulSouth Korea
  3. 3.Department of RadiologySoonchunhyang University Bucheon HospitalBucheonSouth Korea
  4. 4.Department of RadiologySoonchunhyang University Cheonan HospitalCheonanSouth Korea
  5. 5.Department of RadiologyChungbuk National University HospitalCheongju-siSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations