Skip to main content
Log in

Preoperative assessment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma using multidetector-row CT: correlation with histopathological findings

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Radiation Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Our aim was to investigate the diagnostic reliability of multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) for preoperative assessment of local tumoral spread in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Mateirals and methods

Thirteen of 30 consecutive patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma who underwent surgery, excluding 17 patients who underwent biliary drainage or preoperative portal embolization, were retrospectively evaluated. Using MDCT systems of 4 detector rows or 16 detector rows, plain and dynamic contrast-enhanced images of three phases were obtained. Extent of tumor spread and lymph node metastasis were assessed with MDCT and compared with histopathological findings.

Results

The Bismuth-Corlette classification of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with MDCT were type I, 1 patient; type IIIa, 3 patients; type IIIb, 4 patients; and type IV, 5 patients; those with histopathological findings were type I, 1 patient; type IIIa, 2 patients; type IIIb, 4 patients; and type IV, 6 patients. One patient diagnosed as type IIIa with MDCT was pathologically diagnosed as type IV. Accuracy of MDCT in tumoral spread was 92.3%, although that of lymph node metastasis was 54%.

Conclusion

MDCT is likely to play an important role in evaluation of focal lesion spread especially in intrapancreatic tumor invasion, although a greater number of cohort cases are necessary to clearly define its role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bismuth H, Corlette MB. Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1975;140:170–176.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bismuth H, Nakache R, Diamond T. Management strategies in resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 1992;215:31–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stain SC, Baer H, Dennison AR, Blumgart LH. Current management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;175:579–588.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hadjis NS, Blenkharn JI, Alexander N, Benjamin IS, Blumgart LH. Outcome of radical surgery in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery (St. Louis) 1990;107:597–604.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Miyagawa S, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S. Outcome of extended right hepatectomy after biliary drainage in hilar bile duct cancer. Arch Surg 1995;130:759–763.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nichols DA, MacCarty RL, Gaffey TA. Cholangiographic evaluation of bile duct carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983;141:1291–1294.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gibson RN, Yueng E, Thompson JN, Carr DH, Hemingway AP, Bradpiece HA, et al. Bile duct obstruction: radiologic evaluation of level, cause, and tumor resectability. Radiology 1986;160:43–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Triller J, Looser C, Baer HU, Blumgart LH. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: radiological assessment of resectability. Eur Radiol 1994;4:9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Soyer P, Bluemke D, Reichle R, Calhoun PS, Bliss DF, Scherrer A, et al. Imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. II. Hilar cholangiocarcimoa. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:1433–1436.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nesbit GM, Johnson CD, James EM, MacCarty RL, Nagorney DM, Bender CE. Cholangiocarcinoma: diagnosis and evaluation of resectability by CT and sonography as procedures complementary to cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1988;151:933–938.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Choi, BI, Lee SH, Han MC, Kim SH, Yi JG, Kim CW. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: comparative study with sonography and CT. Radiology 1989;172:689–692.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Engels JT, Balfe DM, Lee JKT. Biliary carcinoma: CT evaluation of extrahepatic spread. Radiology 1989;172:35–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Takayasu K, Ikeya S, Mukai K, Muramatsu Y, Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H. CT of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: late contrast enhancement in six patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:1203–1206.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Han JK, Choi BI, Kim TK, Kim SW, Han MC, Yeon KM. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: thin-section spiral CT findings with cholangiographic correlation. Radiographics 1997;17:1475–1485.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hann LE, Greatrex KV, Bach AM, Fong Y, Blumgart LH. Cholangiocarcinoma at the hepatic hilus: sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:985–989.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lacomis JM, Baron RL, Oliver JH III, Nalesnik MA, Federle MP. Cholangiocarcinoma: delayed CT contrast enhancement patterns. Radiology 1997;203:98–104.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tillich M, Mischinger HJ, Preisegger KH, Rabl H, Szolar DH. Multiphasic helical CT in diagnosis and staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:651–658.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Feydy A, Vilgrain V, Denys A, Sibert A, Belghiti J, Vullierme MP, et al. Helical CT assessment in hilar cholangiocarcinoma: correlation with surgical and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:73–77.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cha JH, Han JK, Kim TK, Kim AY, Park SJ, Choi BI, et al. Preoperative evaluation of Klatskin tumor: accuracy of spiral CT in determining vascular invasion as a sign of unresectability. Abdom Imaging 2000;25:500–507.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim HJ, Kim AYK, Hong SS, Kim MH, Byun JH, Won HJ, et al. Biliary ductal evaluation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: three-dimensional direct multi-detector row CT cholangiographic findings versus surgical and pathologic results—feasibility study. Radiology 2006;238:300–308.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee HY, Kim SH, Lee JM, Kim SW, Jang JY, Han JK, et al. Preoperative assessment of resectability of hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma: combined CT and cholangiography with revised criteria. Radiology 2006;239:113–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cho ES, Park MS, Yu JS, Kim MJ, Kim KW. Biliary ductal involvement of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: multidetector computed tomography versus magnetic resonance cholangiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007;31:72–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Chen HW, Pan AZ, Zhen ZJ, Su SY, Wang JH, Yu SC, et al. Preoperative evaluation of resectability of Klatskin tumor with 16-MDCT angiography and cholangiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:1580–1586.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kitagawa Y, Nagino M, Kamiya J, Uesaka K, Sano T, Yamamoto H, et al. Lymph node metastasis from hilar cholangiocarcinoma: audit of 110 patients who underwent regional and paraaortic node dissection. Ann Surg 2001;233:385–392.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takeyuki Watadani.

About this article

Cite this article

Watadani, T., Akahane, M., Yoshikawa, T. et al. Preoperative assessment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma using multidetector-row CT: correlation with histopathological findings. Radiat Med 26, 402–407 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-008-0249-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-008-0249-4

Key words

Navigation