Radiation Medicine

, Volume 25, Issue 10, pp 493–501 | Cite as

Role of cardiac computed tomography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: interaction with nuclear cardiology

  • Daisuke Utsunomiya
  • Seiji Tomiguchi
  • Yasuyuki Yamashita
REVIEW

Abstract

Coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) and myocardial perfusion single photon emission CT (SPECT, or MPS) provide complementary information on vascular structure and myocardial perfusion. In patients with coronary artery disease (CAD), the combination of both methods is helpful for disease detection and therapeutic strategy planning. This article addresses the utility of coronary CTA with current 64-row multidetector CT instruments, MPS, and the combination of these methods in the evaluation of CAD.

Key words

Spiral computed tomography Single-photon emission-computed tomography Coronary disease 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nieman, K, Cademartiri, F, Lemos, PA, Raaijmakers, R, Pattynama, PM, De Feyter, PJ 2002Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomographyCirculation10620514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schuijf, JD, Pundziute, G, Jukema, JW, Lamb, HJ, van der Hoeven, BL, de Roos, A,  et al. 2006Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery diseaseAm J Cardiol981458PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leschka, S, Alkadhi, H, Plass, A, Desbiolles, L, Grunenfelder, J, Marincek, B,  et al. 2005Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experienceEur Heart J2614827PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raff, GL, Gallagher, MJ, O'Neill, WW, Goldstein, JA 2005Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomographyJ Am Coll Cardiol465527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leber, AW, Knez, A, von Ziegler, F, Becker, A, Nikolaou, K, Paul, S,  et al. 2005Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasoundJ Am Coll Cardiol4614754PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mollet, NR, Cademartiri, F, van Mieghem, CA, Runza, G, McFadden, EP, Baks, T,  et al. 2005High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiographyCirculation112231823PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hachamovitch, R, Hayes, SW, Friedman, JD, Cohen, I, Berman, DS 2003Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomographyCirculation10729007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Achenbach, S, Moselewski, F, Ropers, D, Ferencik, M, Hoffmann, U, MacNeill, B,  et al. 2004Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: a segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasoundCirculation109147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Glagov, S, Weisenberg, E, Zarins, CK, Stankunavicius, R, Kolettis, GJ 1987Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteriesN Engl J Med31613715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pundziute, G, Schuijf, JD, Jukema, JW, Boersma, E, de Roos, A, van der Wall, EE,  et al. 2007Prognostic value of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery diseaseJ Am Coll Cardiol496270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wayhs, R, Zelinger, A, Raggi, P 2002High coronary artery calcium scores pose an extremely elevated risk for hard eventsJ Am Coll Cardiol3922530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lau, GT, Ridley, LJ, Schieb, MC, Brieger, DB, Freedman, SB, Wong, LA,  et al. 2005Coronary artery stenoses: detection with calcium scoring, CT angiography, and both methods combinedRadiology23541522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hachamovitch, R, Hayes, SW, Friedman, JD, Cohen, I, Berman, DS 2004Stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography is clinically effective and cost effective in risk stratification of patients with a high likelihood of coronary artery disease (CAD) but no known CADJ Am Coll Cardiol432008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garcia, MJ, Lessick, J, Hoffmann, MH 2006Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosisJAMA29640311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rispler, S, Keidar, Z, Ghersin, E, Roguin, A, Soil, A, Dragu, R,  et al. 2007Integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesionsJ Am Coll Cardiol49105967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schuijf, JD, Wijns, W, Jukema, JW, Atsma, DE, de Roos, A, Lamb, HJ,  et al. 2006Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imagingJ Am Coll Cardiol48250814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Serruys, PW, Ong, AT, van Herwerden, LA, Sousa, JE, Jatene, A, Bonnier, JJ,  et al. 2005Five-year outcomes after coronary stenting versus bypass surgery for the treatment of multivessel disease: the final analysis of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study (ARTS) randomized trialJ Am Coll Cardiol4657581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hannan, EL, Racz, MJ, Walford, G, Jones, RH, Ryan, TJ, Bennett, E,  et al. 2005Long-term outcomes of coronary-artery bypass grafting versus stent implantationN Engl J Med352217483PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Almeda, FQ, Snell, RJ 2005Coronary revascularization in multivessel disease: which is better, stents or surgery?Postgrad Med118117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Klein, LW 2006Are drug-eluting stents the preferred treatment for multivessel coronary artery disease?J Am Coll Cardiol47226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sakuma, H, Ichikawa, Y, Chino, S, Hirano, T, Makino, K, Takeda, K 2006Detection of coronary artery stenosis with whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiographyJ Am Coll Cardiol48194650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Maintz, D, Seifarth, H, Flohr, T, Kramer, S, Wichter, T, Heindel, W,  et al. 2003Improved coronary artery stent visualization and in-stent stenosis detection using 16-slice computed-tomography and dedicated image reconstruction techniqueInvest Radiol387905PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Utsunomiya, D, Awai, K, Sakamoto, T, Hazeyama, H, Nishiharu, T, Urata, J,  et al. 2006In vitro evaluation of metallic coronary artery stents with sub-millimeter multi-slice computed tomography using an ECG-gated cardiac phantom: relationship between in-stent visualization and stent typeCardiology10725460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Probst, C, Kovacs, A, Schmitz, C, Schiller, W, Schild, H, Welz, A 2005Quantification of coronary artery stenosis with 16-slice MSCT in patients before CABG surgery: comparison to standard invasive coronary angiographyHeart Surg Forum8E426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tsui, BM, Gullberg, GT, Edgerton, ER, Ballard, JG, Perry, JR, McCartney, WH,  et al. 1989Correction of nonuniform attenuation in cardiac SPECT imagingJ Nucl Med30497507PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Utsunomiya, D, Tomiguchi, S, Shiraishi, S, Yamada, K, Honda, T, Kawanaka, K,  et al. 2005Initial experience with X-ray CT based attenuation correction in myocardial perfusion SPECT imaging using a combined SPECT/CT systemAnn Nucl Med194859PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Borges-Neto, S, Shaw, LK 1999The added value of simultaneous myocardial perfusion and left ventricular functionCurr Opin Cardiol144603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hoilund-Carlsen, PF, Johansen, A, Christensen, HW, Vach, W, Moldrup, M, Bartram, P,  et al. 2006Potential impact of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy as gatekeeper for invasive examination and treatment in patients with stable angina pectoris: observational study without post-test referral biasEur Heart J272934PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sahin, M, Karakelleoglu, S, Alp, N, Atesal, S, Senocak, H 1994Diagnostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography in coronary artery diseaseThorac Cardiovasc Surg422859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sakuma, H, Suzawa, N, Ichikawa, Y, Makino, K, Hirano, T, Kitagawa, K,  et al. 2005Diagnostic accuracy of stress first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI compared with stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphyAJR Am J Roentgenol18595102PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hamon, M, Biondi-Zoccai, GG, Malagutti, P, Agostoni, P, Morello, R, Valgimigli, M 2006Diagnostic performance of multislice spiral computed tomography of coronary arteries as compared with conventional invasive coronary angiography: a meta-analysisJ Am Coll Cardiol481896910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Radiological Society 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daisuke Utsunomiya
    • 1
  • Seiji Tomiguchi
    • 2
  • Yasuyuki Yamashita
    • 3
  1. 1.Diagnostic Imaging CenterSaiseikai Kumamoto HospitalKumamotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Diagnostic Radiology, School of Health SciencesKumamoto UniversityKumamotoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical SciencesKumamoto UniversityKumamotoJapan

Personalised recommendations