Radiation Medicine

, Volume 24, Issue 8, pp 560–567

Pediatric CT scan usage in Japan: results of a hospital survey

  • Nader Ghotbi
  • Akira Ohtsuru
  • Yoji Ogawa
  • Mariko Morishita
  • Nana Norimatsu
  • Hiroyuki Namba
  • Hiroyuki Moriuchi
  • Masataka Uetani
  • Shunichi Yamashita
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to examine the usage parameters of diagnostic computed tomography (CT) in children because of concerns of possible overuse in Japanese hospitals, including the “technical” CT exposure settings and the “clinical” grounds for CT requests.

Materials and methods

We examined the methodology at the radiology department to reduce radiation exposure to children and performed a retrospective study on pediatric CT requests during a 1-year period at Nagasaki University Hospital. The parameters of diagnostic CT usage for minor head trauma and acute appendicitis were studied in detail.

Results

CT radiation dose settings are adjusted for children based on guidelines issued by the Japan Radiological Society, with few limitations. CT requests were made for 62% of minor head trauma cases and 76% of cases clinically suspected to be acute appendicitis. These figures are considerably higher than those reported by studies in the United Kingdom, Canada, or the United States. No specific guidelines are advocated regarding CT usage for minor head trauma. The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children is almost routinely referred for “confirmation” by CT.

Conclusion

CT radiation risks to children at Japanese hospitals need to be considered more seriously. Physicians should be encouraged to follow diagnostic algorithms that help avoid unnecessary CT usage in children.

Key words

Acute appendicitis Computed tomography (CT) Diagnostic radiation dose Minor head trauma Pediatric radiology 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Frush, DP, Donnelly, LF, Rosen, NS 2003Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should knowPediatrics1129517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paterson, A, Frush, DP, Donnely, LF 2001Helical CT of the body: are settings adjusted for pediatric patients?AJR Am J Roentgenol176297301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brenner, DJ 2002Estimating cancer risks from pediatric CT: going from the qualitative to the quantitativePediatr Radiol3222831PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brenner, DJ, Ellison, CD, Hall, EJ, Berdon, WE 2001Estimated risks of radiation induced fatal cancer from pediatric CTAJR Am J Roentgenol17628996PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Donnelly, LF, Emery, K-H, Brody, AS, Laor, T, Gylys-Morin, VM, Anton, CG,  et al. 2001Minimizing the radiation dose for pediatric body applications of single-detector helical CT: strategies at a large children's hospitalAJR Am J Roentgenol1763036PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Funama, Y, Awai, K, Shimamura, M, Kakei, K, Nagasue, N, Yamashita, Y 2005Reduction of radiation dose at HRCT of the temporal bone in childrenRadiat Med2357883PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Online information available at the homepage of the Japan Radiological society (JRS) (http://www.radiology.or.jp/docs_htm/pediatricCT2005.pdf) and also other guidelines by the Japan Association of Radiological Technologists (JART) available at http://www.jart.jp/guideline/ (both in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takagi, H 2002X-ray exposure dose control for X-ray CT system (in Japanese)Jpn J Med Phys (Igaku Butsuri)22817Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berrington de González, A, Darby, S 2004Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countriesLancet36334551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    International Commission on Radiological Protection. Managing patient dose in computed tomography. ICRP Publication 87. Ann ICRP 2001;30(4)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shiralkar, S, Rennie, A, Snow, M, Galland, RB, Lewis, MH, Gower-Thomas, K 2003Doctors knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire studyBMJ3273712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roebuck, DJ 1999Risk and benefit in pediatric radiologyPediatr Radiol2963740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nickoloff, EL, Alderson, PO 2001Radiation exposure to patients from CT: reality, public perception, and policyAJR Am J Roentgenol1772857PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Golding, SJ, Shrimpton, PC 2002Radiation doses in CT: are we meeting the challenge?Br J Radiol7514PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    White, KS 1996Helical/spiral CT scanning: a pediatric radiology perspectivePediatric Radiol26514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Décarie, JC, Mercier, C 1999The role of ultrasonography in imaging of pediatric head traumaChild Nerv Syst157402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dunning, J, Daly, JP, Malhotra, R, Stratford-Smith, P, Lomas, JP, Lecky, F,  et al. 2004The implications of NICE guidelines on the management of children presenting with head injuryArch Dis Child897637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stiell, IG, Wells, GA, Vandemheen, K, Clement, C, Lesiuk, H, Laupacis, A,  et al. 2001The Canadian CT head rule for patients with minor head injuryLancet35713916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Quality Improvement and American Academy of Family Physicians Commission on Clinical Qualities and Research1999The management of minor closed head injury in childrenPediatrics104140715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schutzman, SA, Barnes, P, Duhaime, AC, Greenes, D, Homer, C, Jaffe, D,  et al. 2001Evaluation and management of children younger than two years old with apparently minor head trauma: proposed guidelinesPediatrics10798393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pickuth, D, Heywang-Köbrunner, SH, Spielmann, RP 2000Suspected acute appendicitis: is ultrasonography or computed tomography the preferred imaging technique?Eur J Surg1663159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Miki, T, Ogata, S, Uto, M, Nakazono, T, Urata, M, Ishibe, R,  et al. 2005Enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and its severityRadiat Med2324255PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weyant, MJ, Eachempati, SR, Maluccio, MA, Spigland, N, Hydo, LJ, Barie, PS 2001The use of computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children does not influence the overall rate of negative appendectomy or perforationSurg Infect21923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Teo, EL, Tan, KP, Lam, SL, Ong, CL, Wong, CS 2000Ultrasonography and computed tomography in a clinical algorithm for the evaluation of suspected acute appendicitis in childrenSingapore Med J4138792PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Martin, AE, Vollman, D, Adler, B, Caniano, DA 2004CT scans may not reduce the negative appendectomy rate in childrenJ Pediatr Surg3988690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Partrick, DA, Janik, JE, Janik, JS, Bensard, DD, Karrer, FM 2003Increased CT scan utilization does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of appendicitis in childrenJ Pediatr Surg3865962PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reich, JD, Brogdon, B, Ray, WE, Eckert, J, Gorell, H 2000Use of CT scan in the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitisPediatr Emerg Care162413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ujiki, MB, Murayama, KM, Cribbins, AJ, Angelos, P, Dawes, L, Prystowsky, JB,  et al. 2002CT scan in the management of acute appendicitisJ Surg Res10511922PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pena, BM, Cook, EF, Mandl, KD 2003Selective imaging strategies for the diagnosis of appendicitis in childrenPediatrics113248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pena, BM, Taylor, GA, Fishman, SJ, Mandl, KD 2002Effect of an imaging protocol on clinical outcomes among pediatric patients with appendicitisPediatrics110108893PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kosloske, AM, Love, CL, Rohrer, JE, Goldthorn, JF, Lacey, SR 2003The diagnosis of appendicitis in children: outcomes of a strategy based on pediatric surgical evaluationPediatrics1132934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stephen, AE, Segev, DL, Ryan, DP, Mullins, ME, Kim, SH, Schnitzer, JJ,  et al. 2003The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a pediatric population: to CT or not to CTJ Pediatr Surg3836771PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nishizawa, K, Matsumoto, M, Iwai, K, Tonari, A, Yoshida, T, Takayama, M 2002Dose evaluation and effective dose estimation from multi detector CT (in Japanese)Jpn J Med Phys (Igaku Butsuri)221528Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Radiological Society 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nader Ghotbi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Akira Ohtsuru
    • 2
  • Yoji Ogawa
    • 3
  • Mariko Morishita
    • 1
    • 2
  • Nana Norimatsu
    • 1
    • 4
  • Hiroyuki Namba
    • 1
  • Hiroyuki Moriuchi
    • 4
  • Masataka Uetani
    • 3
  • Shunichi Yamashita
    • 1
    • 2
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Molecular MedicineAtomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesNagasakiJapan
  2. 2.Takashi Nagai Memorial International Hibakusha Medical CenterNagasaki University HospitalNagasakiJapan
  3. 3.Department of RadiologyNagasaki University HospitalNagasakiJapan
  4. 4.Department of PediatricsNagasaki University HospitalNagasakiJapan
  5. 5.Radiation and Environmental Health, Department of the Protection of Environment, Sustainable Development, and Healthy EnvironmentWHO/HQGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations