The added value of spatially distributed meteorological data for simulating hydrological processes in a small Mediterranean catchment
- 37 Downloads
The purpose of this paper was to demonstrate the added value of the spatial distribution of rainfall and potential evapotranspiration (PE) in the prediction of the discharge for a small Mediterranean catchment located in the Medjerda basin in Tunisia, i.e. the Raghay. We compare therefore the performance of a conceptual hydrological model available in the ATHYS platform, using global and spatial distributed input data. The model was implemented in two different ways. The first implementation was in a spatially distributed mode, and the second one was in a non-distributed lumped mode by using spatially averaged data weighed with a Thiessen-interpolated factor. The performance of the model was analysed for the distributed mode and for the lumped mode with a cross-validation test and through several modelling evaluation criteria. Simultaneously, the impact of the spatial distribution of meteorological data was assessed for the two cases when estimating the model parameters, the flow and water amounts, and the flow duration curves. The cross-validation of the split-sample test shows a preference for the spatially distributed model based on accuracy criteria and graphical comparison. The distributed mode required, however, more simulation time. Finally, the results reported for the Raghay indicated that the added value of the spatial distribution of rainfall and PE is not constant for the whole series of data, depending on the spatial and temporal variability of climate data over the catchment that should be assessed prior to the modelling implementations.
KeywordsMedjerda ATHYS Hydrological modelling Distributed PE and rainfall Accuracy criteria
This research was realized at the Sustainable Management of Water and Soil Resources (UR17AGR03). The authors received funding from the project ‘Adaptation of water resources management in the Medjerda watershed to the challenges of climate change’ through the project 11—axis 2 of the Wallonia Brussels International Grant No. (Aso/CFo/Tunisie/15.1218/cf) and Tunisia Joint Commission 2016–2018. Moreover, part of this research study was accomplished in the Laboratory of HydroSciences in Montpellier with the funding of mobility program provided by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research in Tunisia. Authors also would like to thank the Tunisian General Directorate of Water Resources (DGRE) for providing conventional data for the study area. Finally, the authors would like to express their gratitude for the anonymous reviewers of this paper.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- Bouvier C, Marchandise A, Brunet P, Crespy A (2008) Un modèle pluie-débit distribué événementiel parcimonieux pour la prédétermination et la prévision des crues éclair en zone méditerranéenne. Application au bassin du Gardon d’Anduze. IWRA congress 2008, p 10. https://www.iwra.org/congress/2008/resource/authors/abs811_article.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2018
- Breuer L, Huisman JA, Willems P, Bormann H, Bronstert A, Croke B, Frede H, Gräff T, Hubrechts L, Jakeman A, Kite G, Lanini J, Leavesley G, Lettenmaier D, Lindström G, Seibert J, Sivapalan M, Viney N (2009) Assessing the impact of land use change on hydrology by ensemble modeling (LUCHEM). I: model intercomparison with current land use. Adv Water Resour 32:129–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brulebois E, Ubertosi M, Castel T, Richard Y, Sauvage S, Sanchez Perez JM, Le Moine N, Amiotte-Suchet P (2018) Robustness and performance of semi-distributed (SWAT) and global (GR4J) hydrological models throughout an observed climatic shift over contrasted French watersheds. Open Water J 5(1):41–56. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/openwater/vol5/iss1/4
- Fang X, Thompson DB, Cleveland TG et al (2008) Time of concentration estimated using watershed parameters determined by automated and manual methods. J Irrig Drain Eng 134:202–211. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2008)134:2(202) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gader K, Gara A, Slimani M, Mahjoub MR (2015) Study of spatio-temporal variability of the maximum daily rainfall. In: 2015 6th International conference on modeling, simulation, and applied optimization (ICMSAO). IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
- Gara A, Gader K, Bergaoui M, Mahjoub MR (2015) Assessment of the hydrological response of the watershed through a distributed physically-based modeling for extreme events: application in the Raghay catchment (Medjerda) (Northern Tunisia). In: 6th international conference on modeling, simulation, and applied optimization, ICMSAO 2015. IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
- Ghorbel A (1976) Etude hydrologique de l’oued Rarai. 26Google Scholar
- Hawkins RH (1993) Asymptotic determination of runoff curve numbers from data. J Irrig Drain Eng 119:334–345. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:2(334) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lewis D, Singer MJ, Tate KW (2000) Applicability of SCS curve number method for a California oak woodlands watershed. J Soil Water Conserv 55:226–230Google Scholar
- Mckee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. In: Eighth conference on applied climatology, pp 179–184Google Scholar
- Oudin L, Hervieu F, Michel C, Perrin C, Andréassian V, Anctil F, Loumagne C (2005) Which potential evapotranspiration input for a lumped rainfall–runoff model? Part 2—towards a simple and efficient potential evapotranspiration model for rainfall–runoff modelling. J Hydrol 303:290–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JHYDROL.2004.08.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Saha S, Moorthi S, Pan HL, Wu X, Wang J, Nadiga S, Tripp P, Kistler R, Woollen J, Behringer D, Liu H, Stokes D, Grumbine R, Gayno G, Wang J, Hou Y, Chuang H, Juang H, Sela J, Iredell M, Treadon R, Kleist D, Van Delst P, Keyser D, Derber J, Ek M, Meng J, Wei H, Yang R, Lord S, van den Dool H, Kumar A, Wang W, Long C, Chelliah M, Xue Y, Huang B, Schemm J, Ebisuzaki W, Lin R, Xie P, Chen M, Zhou S, Higgins W, Zou C, Liu Q, Chen Y, Han Y, Cucurull L, Reynolds R, Rutledge G, Goldberg M (2010) The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91:1015–1058. https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Singh J, Knapp HV, Demissie M (2005) Hydrologic modeling of the Iroquois river watershed using HSPF and SWAT. J Am Water Resour Assoc 41(2):343–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03740.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar