Domestic Fauna and Anthropochorous Fauna
- 137 Downloads
- 2 Citations
Abstract
The term “anthropochorous” can be referred to the fauna which has populations or nuclei of individuals brought to and diffused in geographical areas by the direct or indirect action of humans. This definition therefore implicates the role of humans, either conscious or unconscious, in the alteration of the areas of distribution of the fauna. Hence, all the faunal populations that have originated as a consequence of human intervention fully belong to this category. As well as domestic animals in the strict sense, we can also cite several other “wild” species, such as rats and mice, which at present enjoy an artificial diffusion in areas that are completely extraneous to that of their original distribution.
Keywords
animal domestication anthropochorous fauna kynegetisationNotes
Acknowledgments
I would like to express my appreciation and gratitude to Mariolina Corsini, National Centre for Marine Research, Hydrobiological Station of Rhodes; Simon J. M. Davis, Instituto Português de Arquelogia, Lisbon; Katerina Trantalidou, Ephorate of Paleoanthropology and Speleology, Athens; and Jean-Denis Vigne, Laboratoire d’anatomie comparée, CNRS, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, for the engaging discussions which stimulated the elaboration of this work.
References
- 1.Azzaroli A (1984) L’inizio dell’addomesticamento dei grandi mammiferi. Contrib Cent Linceo Interdiscip Sci Mat Appl 68:29–93Google Scholar
- 2.Battaglia S (ed) (1961) Grande dizionario della lingua Italiana, vol 1. Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese, TurinGoogle Scholar
- 3.Battaglia S (ed) (1967) Grande dizionario della lingua Italiana, vol 4. Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese, TurinGoogle Scholar
- 4.Battaglia S (ed) (1998) Grande dizionario della lingua Italiana, vol 19. Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese, TurinGoogle Scholar
- 5.Davis SJM (1982) The taming of the few. New Sci 9:697–700Google Scholar
- 6.Davis SJM (1987) The archaeology of animals. Batsford, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 7.Davis SJM, Valla FR (1978) Evidence for domestication of the dog 12,000 years ago in the Natufian of Israel. Nature 276:608–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Devoto G, Oli GC (1971) Dizionario della lingua Italiana. Le Monnier, Firenze, p 2712Google Scholar
- 9.Diamond J (1997) Guns, germs, and steel. The fates of human societies. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 10.Digard J-P (1990) L’homme et les animaux domestiques. Librairie Arthème Fayard, ParisGoogle Scholar
- 11.Fedele F (1985) Zooarcheologia mesopotamica. In: Gullini G (a cura di) La terra tra i due fiumi. Il Quadrante Edizioni, Turin, pp 66–68Google Scholar
- 12.Halstead P, Jones G (1987) Bioarchaeological remains from Kalythies Cave, Rhodes. In: Sampson A (ed) The Neolithic period in the Dodecanese. Ministry of Culture, Athens, pp 135–152Google Scholar
- 13.Lincoln RJ, Boxshall GA (1987) The Cambridge illustrated dictionary of natural history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 413Google Scholar
- 14.Mainardi D (1984) Le basi etologiche dell’addomesticazione dei vertebrati. Contrib Cent Linceo Interdiscip Sci Mat Appl 68:19–27Google Scholar
- 15.Masseti M (1996) The postglacial diffusion of the genus Dama Frisch, 1775, in the Mediterranean region. Suppl Ric Biol Selvag 25:7–29Google Scholar
- 16.Masseti M (1998) Holocene and anthropochorous wild mammals of the Mediterranean islands. Anthropozoologica 28:3–20Google Scholar
- 17.Masseti M (2002a) Uomini e (non solo) topi. Gli animali domestici e la fauna antropocora. Università degli Studi di Firenze/Firenze University Press, FirenzeGoogle Scholar
- 18.Masseti M (2002b) Island of deer. Natural history of the fallow deer of Rhodes and of the vertebrates of the Dodecanese (Greece). Environment Organization of the City of Rhodes, Rhodes, p 224Google Scholar
- 19.Masseti M, Zava B (2002a) The red deer of Lampedusa (Pelagian islands, Italy): literary references and osteological evidence. Arch Nat Hist 29:51–66Google Scholar
- 20.Masseti M, Zava B (2002b) Nineteenth century wild ungulates (Mammalia, Artiodactyla) of the island of Lampedusa (Pelagian archipelago, Italy). Biogeographia 22:199–215Google Scholar
- 21.Meadow RH (1984) Animal domestication in the Middle East: a view from the eastern margin. In: Clutton-Brock J, Grigson C (eds) Animals and archaeology. 3. Early herders and their flocks. BAR Int Ser 202:309–337Google Scholar
- 22.Sarà M (1998) I mammiferi delle isole del Mediterraneo. L’Epos, PalermoGoogle Scholar
- 23.Tagliacozzo A (1993) L’archeozoologia: problemi e metodologie relativi all’interpretazione dei dati. Origini 17:7–87Google Scholar
- 24.Trantalidou K (2003) Faunal remains from the earliest strata of the Cave of Cyclope, Youra. In: Galanidou N, Perlès C (eds) The Greek mesolithic. BSA Newsletter 10:143–172Google Scholar
- 25.Vigne J-D (1993) Domestication ou appropriation pour la chasse: histoire d’un choix socio-culturel depuis le Néolithique. L’exemple des cerfs (Cervus). In: Exploitation des animaux sauvages a travers le temps. Éditions APDCA, Juan-les-Pines, pp 201–220Google Scholar
- 26.Vigne J-D, Guilaine J, Debue K, Haye L, Gérard P (2004) Early taming of the cat in Cyprus. Science 304:259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Zachariadis G (2002) Tafi “oikositis” fokias 2.000 eton sti Rodo (in Greek). Ta Nea, 7 February 2002, p 28Google Scholar
- 28.Zima J, Macholán M (1989) Robertsonian fusion 5.12 in a population of Mus musculus musculus. Folia Zool 38(3):233–238Google Scholar