Current Medical Science

, Volume 39, Issue 1, pp 94–98 | Cite as

Efficacy and Safety of COX-2 Inhibitor Parecoxib for Rigid Cystoscopy-related Pain Management in Male Patients: A Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Study

  • Jia-yin Sun
  • Zheng-shuai Song
  • Xiao-ping ZhangEmail author
  • Xing-yuan XiaoEmail author


Using anesthetic gel may not sufficiently exclude pain perception during and after cystoscopy in male patients. To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of intramuscular parecoxib (40 mg) for outpatient-based rigid cystoscopy, we performed a prospective, randomized and controlled study. Consecutive male patients requiring diagnostic cystoscopy in our hospital were divided into group A (1% tetracaine gel, n=50) and group B (parecoxib, n=51) at random. Patients received intramuscular injections of either 2 mL sterile saline in group A or 40 mg parecoxib in group B 30 min before the procedure. Tetracaine gel was injected into the urethra 3 min before the procedure in group A, with patients receiving plain lubricant gel in group B at the same time. Cystoscopy-associated pain levels were evaluated using the Visual Analog Score (VAS) during the procedure. Post-procedure urethral pain and complications were recorded and analyzed. The results showed that male patients experienced significantly less pain in group B than in group A (2.70±1.36 vs. 3.56±1.74, P=0.008). The percentage of patients with dysuria pain was not significantly different between the two groups. In addition, 24 h after cystoscopy, the patients with no previous experience of cystoscopy were more likely to declare urethral pain (59.2% vs. 33.3%, P=0.012, relative risk=1.78). No difference was observed in analgesic-related complications between the two groups. We conclude that intramuscular injection of 40 mg parecoxib may improve comfort for male patients undergoing rigid cystoscopy.

Key words

cystoscopy parecoxib tetracaine gel analgesia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Muezzinoglu T, Ceylan Y, Temeltas G, et al. Evaluation of Pain Caused by Urethrocystoscopy in Patients with Superficial Bladder Cancer: A Perspective of Quality of Life. Onkologie, 2005,28(5):260–264Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Babjuk M, Burger M, Zigeuner R, et al. EAU Guidelines on Non–Muscle–invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: Update 2013. Eur Urol, 2013,64(4):639–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yoshimura R, Wada S, Kishimoto T. Why the flexible cystoscope has not yet been widely introduced?: A questionnaire to Japanese urologists. Inter J Urol, 1999,6(11):549–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stein M, Lubetkin D, Taub HC, et al. The effects of intraurethral lidocaine anesthetic and patient anxiety on pain perception during cystoscopy. J Urol, 1994,151(6):1518–1521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brekkan E, Ehrnebo M, Malmstrom PU, et al. A controlled study of low and high volume anesthetic jelly as a lubricant and pain reliever during cystoscopy. J Urol, 1991,146(1):24–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Komiya A, Endo T, Kobayashi M, et al. Oral analgesia by non–steroidal anti–inflammatory drug zaltoprofen to manage cystoscopy–related pain: a prospective study. Int J Urol, 2009,16(11):874–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nussmeier NA, Whelton AA, Brown MT, et al. Safety and Efficacy of the Cyclooxygenase–2 Inhibitors Parecoxib and Valdecoxib after Noncardiac Surgery. Anesthesiology, 2006,104(3):518–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lanas A, Garcíarodríguez LA, Arroyo MT, et al. Risk of upper gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding associated with selective cyclo–oxygenase–2 inhibitors, traditional nonaspirin non–steroidal anti–inflammatory drugs, aspirin and combinations. Gut, 2006,55(12):1731–1738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nussmeier NA, Whelton AA, Brown MT. Complications of the COX–2 Inhibitors Parecoxib and Valdecoxib After Cardiac Surgery. New Engl J Med, 2005,352(11):1081–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Greenstein A, Greenstein I, Senderovich S, et al. Is diagnostic cystoscopy painful? Analysis of 1,320 consecutive procedures. Inter Braz J Urol, 2014,40(4):533–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seklehner S, Remzi M, Fajkovic H, et al. Prospective Multi–institutional Study Analyzing Pain Perception of Flexible and Rigid Cystoscopy in Men. Urology, 2015,85(4):737–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Poletajew S, Bender S, Pudelko P, et al. Anaesthesia of the posterior urethra and pain reduction during cystoscopy–a randomized controlled trial. Videosurg Other Miniinvasive Tech, 2017,12(1):75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pathan SA, Mitra B, Straney LD, et al. Delivering safe and effective analgesia for management of renal colic in the emergency department: a double–blind, multigroup, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2016,387(10032):1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bingham S, Beswick PJ, Blum DE, et al. The role of the cylooxygenase pathway in nociception and pain. Semin Cell Dev Biol, 2006,17(5):544–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rooyen HV. Local anaesthetic agent toxicity. S AfrJ Anaesth Analg, 2014,16(1):83–88Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pliskin MJ, Kreder KJ, Desmond PM, et al. Cocaine and lidocaine as topical urethral anesthetics. J Urol, 1989,141(5):1117–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glemain P, Rivière C, Lenormand L, et al. Factors Predictive of Pain During Cystoscopy: A Prospective Study. J Clin Anal Med, 2014,5(3):186–190Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Seklehner S, Remzi M, Fajkovic H, et al. Prospective multi–institutional study analyzing pain perception of flexible and rigid cystoscopy in men. Urology, 2015,85(4):737–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Krajewski W, Koscielskakasprzak K, Rymaszewska J, et al. How different cystoscopy methods influence patient sexual satisfaction, anxiety, and depression levels: a randomized prospective trial. Qual Life Res, 2017,26(3):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vasudeva P, Kumar A, Kumar N, et al. Effect of intraurethral dwell time of local anesthetic jelly on pain perception in men undergoing outpatient rigid cystoscopy: A randomized prospective study. J Endourol, 2014,28(7):846–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goldfischer ER, Cromie WJ, Karrison TG, et al. Randomized, prospective, double–blind study of the effects on pain perception of lidocaine jelly versus plain lubricant during outpatient rigid cystoscopy. J Urol, 1997,157(1):90–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Huazhong University of Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical CollegeHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations