Acta Seismologica Sinica

, Volume 12, Issue 5, pp 534–541 | Cite as

Generalized Rydelek-Sacks test for distinguishing between periodic and random patterns in seismicity

  • Zhong-Liang Wu


For distinguishing the periodicity of strong earthquakes on the time scale of decades, we generalized the Rydelek-Sacks test (Rydelek, Sacks, 1989) to explore whether a time series is modulated by a periodic process or not. The test is conducted by comparing the total phasor of seismicity with that produced by a random Brownian motion. The phase angle is defined by the origin time of earthquakes relative to a reference time scale. Using this method we tested two hypotheses in geodynamics and earthquake prediction study. One is the hypothesis of Romanowicz (1993) who proposed that the great earthquakes alternate in a predictable fashion between strike-slip and thrusting mechanisms on a 20–30 years cycle. The other hypothesis is that the strong earthquakes in and around China have an active period of about ten years. The test obtains a negative conclusion for the former hypothesis and a positive conclusion for the latter at the 95% confidence level.

Key words

seismicity Rydelek-Sacks test periodicity earthquake prediction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bakun W H, McEvilly T V. 1979. Earthquakes near Parkfield, California: Comparing the 1934 and 1966 sequences. Science, 205: 1375–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakun W H, McEvilly T V. 1984. Recurrence models and Parkfield, California, earthquakes. J Geophys Res, 89: 3051–3058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakun W H, Lindh A G. 1985. The Parkfield, California, earthquake prediction experiment. Science, 229: 619–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dysart P S, Snoke J A, Sacks I S. 1988. Source parameters and scaling relations for small earthquakes in the Matsushiro region, southwest Honshu, Japan. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 78: 571–589Google Scholar
  5. Geller R J, Jackson D D, Kagan Y Y, et al. 1997. Earthquakes cannot be predicted. Science, 275: 1616–1617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gu G X ed. 1989. Catalogue of Chinese Earthquakes (1831 BC - AD 1969). Beijing: Science Press, 872Google Scholar
  7. Johnson S M, Sheridan J M. 1997. Distinguishing between random and nonrandom patterns in the energy release of great earthquakes. J Geophys Res, 102: 2853–2855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kagan Y Y. 1996. VAN earthquake predictions—an attempt at statistical evaluation. Geophys Res Lett, 23: 1315–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kagan Y Y. 1997. Statistical aspects of Parkfield earthquake sequence and Parkfield prediction experiment. Tectonophysics, 270: 207–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ma Z J, Fu Z X, Zhang Y Z, et al. 1990. Earthquake Prediction: Nine Major Earthquakes in China (1966–1976). Beijing: Seismological Press, 332Google Scholar
  11. Mulargia F. 1997. Retrospective validation of the time association of precursors. Geophys J Intl, 131: 500–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Romanowicz B. 1993. Spatiotemporal patterns in the energy release of great earthquakes. Science, 260: 1923–1926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rydelek P A, Sacks I S. 1989. Testing the completeness of earthquake catalogues and the hypothesis of self-similarity. Nature, 337: 251–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Savage J C. 1993. The Parkfield prediction fallacy. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 83: 1–6Google Scholar
  15. Slovic P, Kunreuther H, White G. 1974. Decision processes, rationality, and adjustment to natural hazards. In: White G ed. Natural Hazards, Local, National and Global. New York: Oxford University Press, 187–205Google Scholar
  16. Sornette D, Knopoff L. 1997. The paradox of the expected time until the next earthquake. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 87: 789–798Google Scholar
  17. Stark P B. 1996. A few statistical considerations for ascribing statistical significance to earthquake predictions. Geophys Res Lett, 23: 1399–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stark P B. 1997. Earthquake prediction: the null hypothesis. Geophys J Intl, 131: 495–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang S Y, Wu G, Shi Z L, et al. 1998. Brief introduction to the catalogue of Chinese earthquakes (1912–1990, M S≥4.7). Earthquake Research in China, 14(3): 83–87 (in Chinese with English abstract)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Acta Seismologica Sinica 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhong-Liang Wu
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of GeophysicsChina Seismological BureauBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations