Earthquake Science

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 639–650

The earthquake-related disturbances in ionosphere and project of the first China seismo-electromagnetic satellite

  • Xuhui Shen
  • Xuemin Zhang
  • Lanwei Wang
  • Huaran Chen
  • Yun Wu
  • Shigeng Yuan
  • Junfeng Shen
  • Shufan Zhao
  • Jiadong Qian
  • Jianhai Ding
Review

Abstract

Based on the case studies and statistical analysis of earthquake-related ionospheric disturbances mainly from DEMETER satellite, ground-based GPS and ionosounding data, this paper summarizes the statistical characteristics of earthquake-related ionospheric disturbances, including electromagnetic emissions, plasma perturbations and variation of energetic particle flux. According to the main results done by Chinese scientists, fusing with the existed study from global researches, seismo-ionospheric disturbances usually occurred a few days or hours before earthquake occurrence. Paralleling to these case studies, lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere (LAI) coupling mechanisms are checked and optimized. A thermo-electric model was proposed to explain the seismo-electromagnetic effects before earthquakes. A propagation model was put forward to explain the electromagnetic waves into the ionosphere. According to the requirement of earthquake prediction research, China seismo-electromagnetic satellite, the first space-based platform of Chinese earthquake stereoscopic observation system, is proposed and planned to launch at about the end of 2014. It focuses on checking the LAI model and distinguishing earthquake-related ionospheric disturbance. The preliminary design for the satellite will adopt CAST-2000 platform with eight payloads onboard. It is believed that the satellite will work together with the ground monitoring network to improve the capability to capture seismo-electromagnetic information, which is beneficial for earthquake monitoring and prediction researches.

Key words

seismo-ionospheric coupling earthquake-related ionospheric disturbance China seismoelectromagnetic satellite lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling model 

CLC number

P351.72+P352.4 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cussac T, Clair M, Ultré-Guerard P, Buisson F, Lassalle-Balier G, Ledu M, Elisabelar C, Passot X and Rey N (2006). The Demeter microsatellite and ground segment. Planet Space Science54: 413–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chmyrev V M, Isaev N V, Serebryakova O N, Sorokin V M and Sobolev Y P (1997). Small-scale plasma inhomogeneities and correlated ELF emissions in the ionosphere over an earthquake region. J Atmos Solar-Terr Phys59: 967–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davies K and Baker D M (1965). Ionospheric effects observed around the time of the Alaska earthquake of March 28 1964. J Geophys Res70: 172–179.Google Scholar
  4. Ding J H, Lu Z Y and Yu S R (2011). A Brief Treatise on Seismomagnetism. Publishing House of Chinese University of Sciences and Technology, Hefei, 490pp (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  5. Ding J H, Shen X H and Pan W Y (2006). Research progress of seismoelectromagnetic precursors. Chinese J Radio Science21(5): 791–801 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  6. Gokhberg M B, Pilipenko V A and Pokhotelov O A (1983). Seismic precursors in the ionosphere. Izv Earth Phys19: 762–765 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  7. Hegai V V, Kim V P and Nikiforova L I (1997). A possible generation mechanism of acoustic-gravity waves in the ionosphere before strong earthquakes. J Earthq Predict Res6: 584–589.Google Scholar
  8. Isaev N V and Serebryakova O N (2001). Electromagnetic and plasma effects of seismic activity in the Earth ionosphere. Chem Phys Reports19(6): 1 177–1 188.Google Scholar
  9. Klimenko M V, Klimenko V V, Zakharenkova I E, Pulinets S A, Zhao B and Tzidilina M N (2011). Formation mechanism of great positive disturbances prior to Wenchuan earthquake on May 12, 2008. Adv Space Res48: 488–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lagouttea D, Brochota J Y, de Carvalhoa D, Elie F, Harivelo F, Hobara Y, Madrias L, Parrot M, Pincon J L, Berthelier J J, Peschard D, Seran E, Gangloff M, Sauvaud J A, Lebreton J P, Stverak S, Travnicek P, Grygorczuk J, Slominski J, Wronowski R, Barbier S, Bernard P, Gaboriaud A and Walluth J M (2006). The DEMETER science mission centre. Planet Space Sci54: 428–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Larkina V I, Migulin V V and Molchanov O A (1989). Some statistical results on very low frequency radio wave emissions in the upper ionosphere over earthquake zones. Phys Earth Planet Inter57: 100–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li J Y, Meng G J, Wang M, Liao H and Shen X H (2009). Investigation of ionospheric TEC changes related to the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake based on statistic analysis and signal detection. Earthquake Science22: 545–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu J, Wan W X, Huang J P, Zhang X M, Zhao S F, Ouyang X Y and Zeren Z (2011). Electron density perturbation before Chile M8.8 earthquake. Chinese J Geophys54(11): 2 717–2 725 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  14. Liu J Y, Chen Y I, Chuo Y J and Tsai H F (2001). Variations of ionospheric total electron content during the Chi-Chi earthquake. Geophys Res Lett28: 1 383–1 386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu J Y, Chen Y I, Pulinets S A, Tsai Y B and Chuo Y J (2000). Seismo-ionospheric signatures prior to M>6.0 Taiwan earthquakes. Geophys Res Lett27: 3 113–3 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu J Y, Chuo Y J, Shan S J, Tsai Y B, Chen Y I, Pulinets S A and Yu S B (2004a). Pre-earthquake ionospheric anomalies registered by continuous GPS TEC measurements. Ann Geophys22: 1 585–1 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu J Y, Tsai Y B, Ma K F, Chen Yun-Ing, Tsai H F and Lin C H (2006). Ionospheric GPS total electron content (TEC) disturbances triggered by the 26 December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami. J Geophys Res111: A05304.Google Scholar
  18. Liu J Y, Chen Y I, Huang H K and Lin Y H (2004b). Ionospheric foF2 and TEC anomalous days associated withM≥5 earthquake in Taiwan during 1997–1999. TAO15(3): 371–384.Google Scholar
  19. Molchanov O, Fedorov E, Schekotov A, Gordeev E, Chebrov V, Surkov V, Rozhnoi A, Andreevsky S, Iudin D, Yunga S, Lutikov A, Hayakawa M and Biagi P F (2004). Lithosphere-atmosphere-ionosphere coupling as governing mechanism for preseismic short-term events in atmosphere and ionosphere. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci4: 757–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Molchanov O A, Hayakaya M and Rafalsky V A (1995). Penetration characteristics of electromagnetic emissions from an underground seismic source into the atmosphere, ionosphere, and magnetosphere. J Geophys Res100(A2): 1 691–1 712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ouyang X Y, Zhang X M, Shen X H, Liu J, Qian J D, Cai J A and Zhao S F (2008). Ionospheric Ne disturbances before 2007 Pu’er, Yunnan, China, earthquake. Earthquake Science21(4): 425–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Parrot M (1995). Use of satellites to detect seismoelectromagnetic effects. Adv Space Res15(11): 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parrot M and Lefeuvre F (1989). Correlation between GEOS VLF emissions and earthquakes. Ann Geophys3: 737–748.Google Scholar
  24. Parrot M, Achache J, Berthelier J J, Blanc E, Deschamps A, Lefeuvre F, Menvielle M, Plantet J L, Tarits P and Villain J P (1993). High frequency seismo-electromagnetic effects. Phys Earth Planet Inter77: 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parrot M, Benoist D, Berthelier J, Błęecki J, Chapuis Y, Colin F, Elie F, Fergeau P, Lagoutte D, Lefeuvre F, Legendre C, Lévêque M, Pinçon J L, Poirier B, Seran H-C and Zamora P (2006). The magnetic field experiment IMSC and its data processing onboard DEMETER: Scientific objectives, description and first results. Planet Space Science54: 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pulinets S and Boyarchuk K (2004). Ionospheric Precursors of Earthquakes. Springer, Berlin, 315pp.Google Scholar
  27. Pulinets S and Ouzounov D (2011). Lithosphere-Atmosphere-Ionosphere Coupling (LAIC) model — An unified concept for earthquake precursors validation. J Asian Earth Sci41: 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pulinets S A (1998). Strong earthquakes prediction possibility with the help of topside sounding from satellites. Adv Space Res21(3): 455–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pulinets S A (2004). Ionospheric precursors of earthquakes; recent advances in theory and practical applications. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci15(3): 413–415.Google Scholar
  30. Pulinets S A (2009). Physical mechanism of the vertical electric field generation over active tectonic faults. Adv Space Res44: 767–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pulinets S A and Legen’ka D (2003). Spatial-temporal characteristics of large scale distributions of electron density observed in the ionospheric F-region before strong earthquakes. Cosmic Research41(3): 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pulinets S A, Alekseev V A, Legen’ka A D and Khegai V V (1997). Radon and metallic aerosols emanation before strong earthquakes and their role in atmosphere and ionosphere modification. Adv Space Res20: 2 173–2 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pulinets S A, Bondur V G, Tsidilina M N and Gaponova M V (2010). Verification of the concept of seismoionospheric relations under quiet heliogeomagnetic conditions, using the Wenchuan (China) earthquake of May 12, 2008, as an example. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy50(2): 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pulinets S A, Boyarchuk K A, Hegai V V, Kim V P and Lomonosov A M (2000). Quasielectrostatic model of atmosphere-thermosphere-ionosphere coupling. Adv Space Res26(8): 1 209–1 218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pulinets S A, Khegai V V, Boyarchuk K A and Lomonosov A M (1998). Atmospheric electric field as a source of ionospheric variability. Physics-Uspekhi41(5): 515–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pulinets S A, Legen’ka A D and Alekseev V A (1994). Pre-earthquakes effects and their possible mechanisms. In: Kikuchi H ed. Dusty and Dirty Plasmas, Noise and Chaos in Space and in the Laboratory. Plenum Publishing, New York, 545–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pulinets S A, Legen’ka A D, Gaivoronskaya T V and Depuev V K (2003). The main phenomenological features of ionospheric precursors of strong earthquakes. J Atm Solar Terr Phys65: 1 337–1 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ruzhin Y Y and Larkina V I (1996). Magnetic conjugation and a time coherency of seismoionosphere VLF bursts and energetic particles. In: Proceedings of International Wroclaw Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility. June 25–28, Poland, Wroclaw, 645–648.Google Scholar
  39. Ruzhin Y Y, Larkina V I and Depueva A K (1998). Earthquake precursors in magnetically conjugated ionosphere regions. Adv Space Res21: 525–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shalimov S L and Gokhberg M B (1998). Lithosphereionosphere coupling mechanism and its application to earthquake in Iran on June 20 1990. A review of ionospheric measurements and basic assumptions. Phys Earth Planet Inter105: 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shen J, Shen X and Liu Q (2009). The thermo-electric effect of natural minerals and its potential in application in earthquake prediction research. Bulletin of Minerals, Rocks and Geochemistry28(3): 301–307 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  42. Shen J, Shen X and Liu Q (2010a). The thermoelectric effect of magnetite: a new model for abnormal geo-electricity from the formation and occurrence of earthquake.J Mineral Petrol30(4): 21–27 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  43. Shen J F, Shen X H, Liu Q and Ying N (2010a). The thermoelectric effect of magnetite and mechanism of geo-electric abnormalities during earthquake. Geoscience Frontiers1(1): 99–104 (in Chinese with English abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Shen X H, Shan X J, Wu Y, Zhang J F, Kang C L, Ding J H, Qian J D, Yang D M, Du X B and Wang L W (2007). Current status of remote sensing application in earthquake science and the framework of Chinese seismo-related satellite mission. Recent Developments in World Seismology (8): 38–45 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  45. Sorokin V M, Yaschenko A K and Hayakawa M (2007). A perturbation of DC electric field caused by light ion adhesion to aerosols during the growth in seismic-related atmospheric radioactivity. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci7: 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Takeuchi B, Lau W S and Freund F T (2004). Current and surface potential induced by stress-activated positive holes in igneous rocks. Phys Chem Earth31(4–9): 240–247.Google Scholar
  47. Zhang X, Shen X, Liu J, Ouyang X, Qian J and Zhao S (2010a). Ionospheric perturbations of electron density before the Wenchuan earthquake. International Journal of Remote Sensing31(13): 3 559–3 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhang X, Zeren Z, Parrot M, Battiston R, Qian J and Shen X (2011). ULF/ELF ionospheric electric field and plasma perturbations related to Chile earthquakes. Adv Space Res47: 991–1 000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhang X M, Ding J H, Shen X H, Wang M, Liu J, Yu S R, Wang Y L and Ouyang X Y (2009a). Electromagnetic perturbations before Wenchuan M8 earthquake and stereo electromagnetic observation system. Chinese J Radio Science24(1): 1–8 (in Chinese with English abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhang X M, Liu J, Shen X H, Parrot M, Qian J D, Ouyang X Y, Zhao S F and Huang J (2010b). Ionospheric perturbations associated with the M8.6 Sumatra earthquake on 28 March 2005. Chinese J Geophys53(3): 567–575.Google Scholar
  51. Zhang X M, Qian J D, Ouyang X Y, Cai J A, Liu J, Shen X H and Zhao S F (2009b). Ionospheric electro-magnetic disturbances prior to Yutian 7.2 earthquake in Xinjiang. Chin Space Sci29(2): 213–221.Google Scholar
  52. Zhang X M, Qian J D, Ouyang X Y, Shen X H, Cai J A and Zhao S F (2009c). Ionospheric electromagnetic perturbations observed on DEMETER satellite before Chile M7.9 earthquake. Earthquake Science22: 251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang X M, Shen X H, Liu J, Ouyang X Y, Qian J D, and Zhao S F (2009d). Analysis of ionosphere plasma perturbations before Wenchuan earthquake. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci9: 1 259–1 266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zhang X M, Shen X H, Ouyang X Y, Cai J A, Huang J P, Liu J and Zhao S F (2009e). Ionosphere VLF electric field anomalies before Wenchuan M8 earthquake. Chinese J Radio Science24(6): 1 024–1 032 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  55. Zhao S F, Shen X H, Pan W Y, Zhang X M and Liao L (2010). Penetration characteristics of VLF wave from atmosphere into lower ionosphere. Earthquake Science23: 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Seismological Society of China and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xuhui Shen
    • 1
  • Xuemin Zhang
    • 1
  • Lanwei Wang
    • 2
  • Huaran Chen
    • 3
  • Yun Wu
    • 4
  • Shigeng Yuan
    • 5
  • Junfeng Shen
    • 6
  • Shufan Zhao
    • 1
  • Jiadong Qian
    • 1
  • Jianhai Ding
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Earthquake ScienceChina Earthquake AdministrationBeijingChina
  2. 2.Institute of Crustal DynamicsChina Earthquake AdministrationBeijingChina
  3. 3.Institute of GeophysicsChina Earthquake AdministrationBeijingChina
  4. 4.Earthquake Administration of Hubei ProvinceWuhanChina
  5. 5.DFH Satellite Co. Ltd.BeijingChina
  6. 6.State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral ResourcesChinese University of GeosciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations