Atmosphere-ionosphere response to the M9 Tohoku earthquake revealed by multi-instrument space-borne and ground observations: Preliminary results
We retrospectively analyzed the temporal and spatial variations of four different physical parameters characterizing the state of the atmosphere and ionosphere several days before the M9 Tohoku, Japan earthquake of March 11, 2011. The data include outgoing long wave radiation (OLR), GPS/TEC, lower Earth orbit ionospheric tomography and critical frequency foF2. Our first results show that on March 7th a rapid increase of emitted infrared radiation was observed from the satellite data and an anomaly developed near the epicenter. The GPS/TEC data indicate an increase and variation in electron density reaching a maximum value on March 8. Starting from this day in the lower ionosphere also there was confirmed an abnormal TEC variation over the epicenter. From March 3 to 11 a large increase in electron concentration was recorded at all four Japanese ground-based ionosondes, which returned to normal after the main earthquake. The joint preliminary analysis of atmospheric and ionospheric parameters during the M9 Tohoku, Japan earthquake has revealed the presence of related variations of these parameters implying their connection with the earthquake process. This study may lead to a better understanding of the response of the atmosphere/ionosphere to the great Tohoku earthquake.
Key wordsTohoku earthquake thermal anomaly GPS/TEC earthquake precursor early warning
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Inan S, Akgu T, Seyis C, Saatc R, Baykut S, Ergintav S and Bas M (2008). Geochemical monitoring in the Marmara region (NW Turkey): A search for precursors of seismic activity. J Geophys Res113: B03401, doi:10.1029/2007JB005206.Google Scholar
- Kon S, Nishihashi M and Hattori K (2010). Ionospheric anomalies possibly associated with M≥6.0 earthquakes in the Japan area during 1998–2010: Case studies and statistical study. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences41(4–5): 410–420, doi:10.1016/j.jseases.2010.10.005.Google Scholar
- Kunitsyn V and Tereshchenko E (2001). Ionosphere Tomography. Springer, Berlin, 260pp.Google Scholar
- Liu D (2000). Anomalies analyses on satellite remote sensing OLR before Jiji earthquake of Taiwan Province. Geo-Information Science2(1): 33–36 (in Chinese with English abstract).Google Scholar
- Němec F, Santolík O, Parrot M and Berthelier J J (2009). Spacecraft observations of electromagnetic perturbations connected with seismic activity. Geophys Res Lett35: L05109, doi:10.1029/2007GL032517.Google Scholar
- Ouzounov D, Pulinets S, Hattori K, Kafatos M and Taylor P (2011a). Atmospheric signals associated with major earthquakes: A multi-sensor approach. In: Hayakawa M ed. Frontier of Earthquake Short-term Prediction Study. NSTSS, Japan (in press)Google Scholar
- Ouzounov D, Hattori K, Pulinets S, Liu T, Partot M, Kafatos M, Taylor P, Yang F, Oyama K and Kon S (2011b). Integrated sensing, analysis and validation of atmospheric signals associated with major earthquakes. Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 13, EGU2011-11932-1, EGU General Assembly.Google Scholar
- Oyama K-I, Kakinami Y, Liu J Y, Abdu M A and Cheng C Z (2011). Latitudinal distribution of anomalous ion density as a precursor of a large earthquake. J Geophys Res116: A04319, doi:10.1029/2010JA015948.Google Scholar
- Parrot M (2009). Anomalous seismic phenomena: View from space in electromagnetic phenomena associated with earthquakes. In: Hayakawa M ed. Electromagnetic Phenomena Associated with Eatrhquakes Transworld Research Network, Trivandrum, India, Chapter 8, 205–234.Google Scholar
- Pulinets S and Boyarchuk K (2004). Ionospheric Precursors of Earthquakes. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 315pp.Google Scholar
- Romanov A A, Trusov S V and Romanov A A (2009). Automated information technology for ionosphere monitoring of low-orbit navigation satellite signals. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on the Okhotsk Sea and Adjacent Areas North Pacific. PICES Sci. Rep. No. 36, 203–207.Google Scholar
- Tramutoli V, Bello Di G, Pergola N and Piscitelli S (2001). Robust satellite techniques for remote sensing of seismically active areas. Ann Geophys44(2): 295–312.Google Scholar