Advertisement

Acta Seismologica Sinica

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 195–204 | Cite as

Multifractal characteristics of general stress release (GSR) of earthquakes

  • Chen Shi-jun 
  • David Harte
  • Ma Li 
  • Wang Li-feng 
Article

Abstract

Using multifractal spectrum estimating method based on the wavelet, the multifractal characteristics of GSR of earthquakes in China, Japan and New Zealand regions have been studied. It is shown that the multifractal spectra of GSR are obviously different in inter- and intra- plate regions. Moreover, though Japan and New Zealand are all located at the boundary of plates, West and East China are all characterized of continental tectonic structure, the multifractal spectra of GSR for both the two regions are also different. Further analysis shows that the natures of multifractal spectra of GSR are somehow related to the complexity of tectonics.

Key words

wavelet multifractal spectra general stress release 

CLC number

P315.72+

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AN Zhen-Wen, YANG Cui-hua, WANG Lin-Ying, et al. 2000. Study on the multifractals of time and space clustering of earthquakes [J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 43(1): 4–80.Google Scholar
  2. Bacy E., Muzy J, Arneodo A. 1993. Singularity spectrum of fractal singals from wavelet analysis: Exact results [J]. J Stat Phys, 70: 635–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Zion Y, Lyakhovsky V. 2002. Accelerated seismic release and related aspects of seismicity patterns on earthquakes faults [J]. Pure Appl Geophys, 159: 2 385–2 412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Godano C, Alonzo M L, Vilardo G. 1997. Multifractal approach to time clustering of earthquakes [J]. Pure Appl Geophys, 149: 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harte D. 2000. Document for the statistical seismological library [R]. Research rept. 98-10, revised edn, School of mathematical and computing sciences, Wellington: Victoria University of Wellington, 77–151.Google Scholar
  6. Harte D. 2001. Multifractals — Theory and Application [M]. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 127–194.Google Scholar
  7. Heinz-Otto P, Hutmart J, Dietmar S. 1997. Chaos and Fractal—New Frontiers of Science [M]. New York: Springer Velay, Hamilton Printing Co. Rennselaer, 921–954.Google Scholar
  8. Hirata H T. 1991. Multifractal analysis of spatial distribution of microearthquakes in the Kanto region [J]. Geophys J Int, 107: 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hooge C, Schertzer D, Malouin J F, et al. 1994. Multifractal phase transition: the origin of self-organized criticality in earthquakes [J]. Nonlin Proc Geophys, 1: 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Muzy J, Bacy E, Arneodo A. 1994. The multifractal formulism revisited with wavelets [J]. Int Jour of Bifur Chaos, 4: 245–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. WANG Jeen-Hwa, LEE Chung-Wein. 1997. Multifractal measures of time series of earthquakes [J]. J Phys Earth, 45: 331–345.Google Scholar
  12. ZHU Ling-Ren, ZHOU Shi-Yong. 1992. Study on the crowding index spectrum f(α) of seismic multifractal [J]. Northwestern Seismological Journal, 14(2): 30–35 (in Chinese).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Acta Seismologica Sinica 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chen Shi-jun 
    • 1
  • David Harte
    • 2
  • Ma Li 
    • 3
  • Wang Li-feng 
    • 3
  1. 1.Seismological Bureau of Shandong ProvinceJi’nanChina
  2. 2.Statistics Research Associates LimitedWellingtonNew Zealand
  3. 3.Center for Analysis and predictionChinese Seismological BureauBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations