Acta Seismologica Sinica

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 616–627 | Cite as

The accurate location of the injection-induced microearthquakes in German Continental Deep Drilling Program

  • Tu Yi-min 
  • Chen Yun-tai 


From August 21, 2000 to October 20, 2000 a fluid injection-induced seismicity experiment has been carried out in the KTB (German Continental Deep Drilling Program). The KTB seismic network recorded more than 2 700 events. Among them 237 events were of high signal-to-noise ratio, and were processed and accurately located. When the events were located, non KTB events were weeded out by Wadati’s method. The standard deviation, mean and median were obtained by Jackknife’s technique, and finally the events were accurately located by Geiger’s method so that the mean error is about 0.1 km. No earthquakes with focal depth greater than 9.3 km, which is nearly at the bottom of the hole, were detected. One of the explanation is that at such depths the stress levels may not close to the rock’s frictional strength so that failure could not be induced by the relatively small perturbation in pore pressure. Or at these depths there may be no permeable, well-oriented faults. This depth may be in close proximity to the bottom of the hole to the brittle-ductile transition, even in this relatively stable interior of the interaplate. This phenomenon is explained by the experimental results and geothermal data from the superdeep borehole.

Key words

scientific deep drilling fluid-injection induced seismicity earthquake location Jackknife method brittle-ductile transition 

CLC number



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Antonni M. 1987. Statistics and source pattern of the swarm from digital recordings [A]. In Prochazkova D ed. Earthquake Swarm 1985/86 in Western Bohemia [C] Prague Geophys. Inst. Czech. Acad. Sci., 205–217.Google Scholar
  2. Brudy M, Zoback M D, Fuchs K. et al. 1997. Estimation of the complete stress tensor to 8 km depth in the KTB scientific drill holes: Implications for crustal strength [J]. J Geophys Res, 102 (B8): 18 453–18 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clauser C. 1997. The thermal regime of the crystalline continental crust Implications from the KTB [J]. J Geophys Res. 102(B8): 18 417–18 441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Emmermann R, Lauterjung J. 1997. The German continental deep drilling program KTB: Overview and major results [J]. J Geophys Res, 102(B8): 18 179–18 201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Geiger L. 1912. Probability method for the determination of earthquake epicenter from the arrival time only [J]. Bull St Louis Univ, 8: 60–71Google Scholar
  6. Harjes H-P, Bram K. Duerbaum H-J, et al. 1997. Origin and nature of crustal reflections: results from integrated seismic measurements at the KTB superdeep drilling site [J]. J Geophys Res, 102 (B8): 18 267–18 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dahlhaim H-A, Gebrande H, Schmedes E, et al. 1997. Seismicity and stress field in the vicinity of the KTB location [J] J Geophys Res, 102(B8): 18 293–18 506.Google Scholar
  8. Jost M L, Buesselberg T, Jost O, et al. 1998. Source parameters of injection-induced microearthquakes at 9 km depth at the KTB deep drilling site Germany [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 88(3): 815–832.Google Scholar
  9. Haak V, Jones A G 1997. Introduction to special section: The KTB deep drill hole [J]. J Geophys Res, 102(B8): 18 175–18 177.Google Scholar
  10. Meissner R, Strehlau J. 1982. Limits of stresses in the continental crusts and their relation to the depth-frequency distribution of shallow earthquakes [J]. Tectonics, 1: 173–189.Google Scholar
  11. Sibson R H. 1982. Fault zones models, heat flow, and the depth distribution of earthquake in the continental crust of the United States [J]. Bull Seism Soc Amer, 72: 151–163.Google Scholar
  12. Smith R B, Bruhn R L. 1984. Intraplate extensional tectonics of the eastern Basin-Range: Inferences on structural style from seismic reflection data regional tectonics, and thermal-mechanical models of the brittle-ductile deformation [J]. J Geophys Res, 89: 5 733–5 762.Google Scholar
  13. Tichelaar B W, Ruff L J. 1989. How good are our best models? [J]. Eos, Trans Amer Geophys Union, 70 (20): 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zoback M D, Harjes H-P. 1997. Injection-induced earthquake and crustal stress at 9 km depth at the KTB deep drilling site. Germany [J]. J Geophys Res, 102(B8): 18 477–18 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Acta Seismologica Sinica 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tu Yi-min 
    • 1
  • Chen Yun-tai 
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of GeophysicsChina Seismological BureauBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations