Advertisement

Ionics

, Volume 25, Issue 12, pp 6093–6106 | Cite as

Rapid, trace-level direct cathodic voltammetric determination of dopamine by oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotube–modified carbon paste electrode in selected samples of pharmaceutical importance

  • Jasmina AnojčićEmail author
  • Valéria Guzsvány
  • Zoltán Kónya
  • Momir Mikov
Original Paper
  • 131 Downloads

Abstract

Selected carbonaceous nanomaterial–modified carbon paste electrodes (CPEs) were compared for trace-level determination of dopamine (DA) by direct cathodic square wave voltammetry (SWV). The advanced nanomaterials containing electrodes were obtained from homemade multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) in their native and functionalized (ox-MWCNTs) forms, commercially available MWCNTs, single-walled carbon nanotubes, and fullerene, by a very simple drop coating method, and from classical CPE which consists of graphite powder and paraffin oil only. The comparative SWV measurements confirmed the priority of ox-MWCNT/CPE as it exhibited the best analytical performance with a well-shaped and intensive DA signal, which strongly depended upon pH and exhibited the most favorable characteristics at pH 6.3 (0.1 M phosphate buffer solution). The cyclic voltammetric (CV) characterization of DA on ox-MWCNT/CPE confirmed the reversible process and much higher sensitivity of this electrode in comparison with the other ones. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopic measurements indicated a significant difference between MWCNTs and ox-MWCNTs, which is the consequence of the chemical oxidation/functionalization of the latter one having a positive influence on its sensing properties. The optimized SWV method was characterized by a linear concentration range of 16.15–192.70 ng mL−1 DA, a relative standard deviation (RSD) lower than 1.3%, and a detection limit in the model solution of 4.89 ng mL−1. Also, interferences from ascorbic acid were negligible. The developed method was successfully applied for DA determination in injection/selected infusion matrix solutions, whereby the obtained results were in good agreement with DA content declared by the producer with RSD of the method below 1.0%.

Keywords

Dopamine Electrochemical sensor Square wave voltammetry Carbon paste electrode Oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes Injection/infusion samples 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the Ministry of Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia (Project Nos. 172012 and 172059) and the CEEPUSIII (CZ-0212-12-1819) network.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11581_2019_3156_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (493 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 493 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Missale C, Nash SR, Robinson SW, Jaber M, Caron MG (1998) Dopamine receptors: from structure to function. Physiol Rev 78:189–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sajid M, Nazal MK, Mansha M, Alsharaa A, Jillani SMS, Basheer C (2016) Chemically modified electrodes for electrochemical detection of dopamine in the presence of uric acid and ascorbic acid: a review. Trends Anal Chem 76:15–29Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li Y, Gu Y, Zheng B, Luo L, Li C, Yan X, Zhang T, Lu N, Zhang Z (2017) A novel electrochemical biomimetic sensor based on poly(Cu-AMT) with reduced graphene oxide for ultrasensitive detection of dopamine. Talanta 162:80–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pourghobadi Z, Neamatollahi D (2017) Voltammetric determination of dopamine using modified glassy carbon electrode by electrografting of catechol. J Serb Chem Soc 82:1053–1061Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dhanjai SA, Lu X, Wu L, Tan D, Li Y, Chen J, Jain R (2018) Voltammetric sensing of biomolecules at carbon based electrode interfaces: a review. Trends Anal Chem 98:174–189Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gupta AK, Swarnkar S, Kumar GK, Goyal V, Chadda RK, Hariprasad G (2017) Dopamine based pharmaco-therapeutics of schizophrenia and Parkinson’s disease: two ends of one spectrum. Ann Pharmacol Pharm 2:1–6Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perry M, Li Q, Kennedy RT (2009) Review of recent advances in analytical techniques for the determination of neurotransmitters. Anal Chim Acta 653:1–22PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baranwal A, Chandra P (2018) Clinical implications and electrochemical biosensing of monoamine neurotransmitters in body fluids, in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo models. Biosens Bioelectron 121:137–152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li N, Zheng L, Liao F, Zheng H, Suye S (2019) Fabrication of PEI-Fc/SGO multilayer films modified electrode through LBL assembly technique for the detection of dopamine. Ionics 25:2823–2833Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jackowska K, Krysinski P (2013) New trends in the electrochemical sensing of dopamine. Anal Bioanal Chem 405:3753–3771PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nieoullon A (2002) Dopamine and the regulation of cognition and attention. Prog Neurobiol 67:53–83PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    World Health Organization (2018) The international pharmacopoeia - eighth edition. World Health Organization, Dept. of Essential Medicines and Pharmaceutical Policies, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Numan A, Shahid MM, Omar FS, Ramesh K, Ramesh S (2017) Facile fabrication of cobalt oxide nanograin-decorated reduced graphene oxide composite as ultrasensitive platform for dopamine detection. Sensors Actuators B Chem 238:1043–1051Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baig N, Rana A, Kawde A-N (2018) Modified electrodes for selective voltammetric detection of biomolecules. Electroanalysis 30:2551–2574Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang D-Q, Chen C, Wu Y-M, Zhang H, Sheng L-Q, Xu H-J, Liu Z-D (2012) The determination of dopamine using glassy carbon electrode pretreated by a simple electrochemical method. Int J Electrochem Sci 7:5510–5520Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Huang J, Liu Y, Hou H, You T (2008) Simultaneous electrochemical determination of dopamine, uric acid and ascorbic acid using palladium nanoparticle-loaded carbon nanofibers modified electrode. Biosens Bioelectron 24:632–637PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bagheri H, Pajooheshpour N, Jamali B, Amidi S, Hajian A, Khoshsafar H (2017) A novel electrochemical platform for sensitive and simultaneous determination of dopamine, uric acid and ascorbic acid based on Fe3O4-SnO2-Gr ternary nanocomposite. Microchem J 131:120–129Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kalcher K, Svancara I, Buzuk M, Vytras K, Walcarius A (2009) Electrochemical sensors and biosensors based on heterogeneous carbon materials. Monatsh Chem 140:861–889Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Beyene NW, Kotzian P, Schachl K, Alemu H, Turkušić E, Chopra A, Moderegger H, Švancara I, Vytřas K, Kalcher K (2004) (Bio)sensors based on manganese dioxide-modified carbon substrates: retrospections, further improvements and applications. Talanta 64:1151–1159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Agüí L, Yáñez-Sedeño P, Pingarrón JM (2008) Role of carbon nanotubes in electroanalytical chemistry. A review. Anal Chim Acta 622:11–47PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Alothman ZA, Bukhari N, Wabaidur SM, Haider S (2010) Simultaneous electrochemical determination of dopamine and acetaminophen using multiwall carbon nanotubes modified glassy carbon electrode. Sensors Actuators B Chem 146:314–320Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jo S, Jeong H, Bae SR, Jeon S (2008) Modified platinum electrode with phytic acid and single-walled carbon nanotube: application to the selective determination of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic and uric acids. Microchem J 88:1–6Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bandaru PR (2007) Electrical properties and applications of carbon nanotube structures. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 7:1–29Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yang C, Denno ME, Pyakurel P, Venton BJ (2015) Recent trends in carbon nanomaterial-based electrochemical sensors for biomolecules: a review. Anal Chim Acta 887:17–37PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Henstridge MC, Dickinson EJF, Aslanoglu M, Batchelor-McAuley C, Compton RG (2010) Voltammetric selectivity conferred by the modification of electrodes using conductive porous layers or films: the oxidation of dopamine on glassy carbon electrodes modified with multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Sensors Actuators B Chem 145:417–427Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gooding JJ (2005) Nanostructuring electrodes with carbon nanotubes: a review on electrochemistry and applications for sensing. Electrochim Acta 50:3049–3060Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wu K, Fei J, Hu S (2003) Simultaneous determination of dopamine and serotonin on a glassy carbon electrode coated with a film of carbon nanotubes. Anal Biochem 318:100–106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wu K, Hu S (2004) Electrochemical study and selective determination of dopamine at a multi-wall carbon nanotube-Nafion film coated glassy carbon electrode. Microchim Acta 144:131–137Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Deng C, Chen J, Wang M, Xiao C, Nie Z, Yao S (2009) A novel and simple strategy for selective and sensitive determination of dopamine based on the boron-doped carbon nanotubes modified electrode. Biosens Bioelectron 24:2091–2094PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cui R, Wang X, Zhang G, Wang C (2012) Simultaneous determination of dopamine, ascorbic acid, and uric acid using helical carbon nanotubes modified electrode. Sensors Actuators B Chem 161:1139–1143Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang B, Huang D, Xu X, Alemu G, Zhang Y, Zhan F, Shen Y, Wang M (2013) Simultaneous electrochemical determination of ascorbic acid, dopamine and uric acid with helical carbon nanotubes. Electrochim Acta 91:261–266Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang M, Gong K, Zhang H, Mao L (2005) Layer-by-layer assembled carbon nanotubes for selective determination of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid. Biosens Bioelectron 20:1270–1276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang Z, Liu J, Liang Q, Wang Y, Luo G (2002) Carbon nanotube-modified electrodes for the simultaneous determination of dopamine and ascorbic acid. Analyst 127:653–658PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang Z, Liang Q, Wang Y, Luo G (2003) Carbon nanotube-intercalated graphite electrodes for simultaneous determination of dopamine and serotonin in the presence of ascorbic acid. J Electroanal Chem 540:129–134Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang P, Wu F-H, Zhao G-C, Wei X-W (2005) Selective response of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid at multi-walled carbon nanotube modified gold electrode. Bioelectrochemistry 67:109–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Moreno M, Sánchez Arribas A, Bermejo E, Chicharro M, Zapardiel A, Rodríguez MC, Jalit Y, Rivas GA (2010) Selective detection of dopamine in the presence of ascorbic acid using carbon nanotube modified screen-printed electrodes. Talanta 80:2149–2156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hočevar SB, Wang J, Deo RP, Musameh M, Ogorevc B (2005) Carbon nanotube modified microelectrode for enhanced voltammetric detection of dopamine in the presence of ascorbate. Electroanalysis 17:417–422Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Swamy BEK, Venton BJ (2007) Carbon nanotube-modified microelectrodes for simultaneous detection of dopamine and serotonin in vivo. Analyst 132:876–884PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tan C, Dutta G, Yin H, Siddiqui S, Arumugam PU (2018) Detection of neurochemicals with enhanced sensitivity and selectivity via hybrid multiwall carbon nanotube-ultrananocrystalline diamond microelectrodes. Sensors Actuators B Chem 258:193–203Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Britto PJ, Santhanam KSV, Ajayan PM (1996) Carbon nanotube electrode for oxidation of dopamine. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 41:121–125Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cincotto FH, Canevari TC, Campos AM, Landers R, Machado SAS (2014) Simultaneous determination of epinephrine and dopamine by electrochemical reduction on the hybrid material SiO2/graphene oxide decorated with Ag nanoparticles. Analyst 139:4634–4640PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Niesz K, Siska A, Vesselényi I, Hernadi K, Méhn D, Galbács G, Kónya Z, Kiricsi I (2002) Mechanical and chemical breaking of multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Catal Today 76:3–10Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zbiljić J, Vajdle O, Guzsvány V, Molnar J, Agbaba J, Dalmacija B, Kalcher K (2015) Hydrodynamic chronoamperometric method for the determination of H2O2 using MnO2-based carbon paste electrodes in groundwater treated by Fenton and Fenton-like reagents for natural organic matter removal. J Hazard Mater 283:292–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Anojčić J, Guzsvány V, Vajdle O, Madarász D, Rónavári A, Kónya Z, Kalcher K (2016) Hydrodynamic chronoamperometric determination of hydrogen peroxide using carbon paste electrodes coated by multiwalled carbon nanotubes decorated with MnO2 or Pt particles. Sensors Actuators B Chem 233:83–92Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Anojčić J, Guzsvány V, Vajdle O, Kónya Z, Kalcher K (2018) Rapid amperometric determination of H2O2 by a Pt nanoparticle/Vulcan XC72 composite-coated carbon paste electrode in disinfection and contact lens solutions. Monatsh Chem 149:1727–1738Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Švancara I, Metelka R, Vytřas K (2005) Piston-driven carbon paste electrode holders for electrochemical measurements. In: Vytřas K, Kalcher K (eds) Sensing in electroanalysis. University of Pardubice, Pardubice, pp 7–18Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Guzsvány V, Anojčić J, Radulović E, Vajdle O, Stanković I, Madarász D, Kónya Z, Kalcher K (2017) Screen-printed enzymatic glucose biosensor based on a composite made from multiwalled carbon nanotubes and palladium containing particles. Microchim Acta 184:1987–1996Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Guzsvány V, Anojčić J, Vajdle O, Radulović E, Madarász D, Kónya Z, Kalcher K (2019) Amperometric determination of glucose in white grape and in tablets as ingredient by screen-printed electrode modified with glucose oxidase and composite of platinum and multiwalled carbon nanotubes. Food Anal Methods 12:570–580Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Stobinski L, Lesiak B, Kövér L, Tóth J, Biniak S, Trykowski G, Judek J (2010) Multiwall carbon nanotubes purification and oxidation by nitric acid studied by the FTIR and electron spectroscopy methods. J Alloys Compd 501:77–84Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Osswald S, Havel M, Gogotsi Y (2007) Monitoring oxidation of multiwalled carbon nanotubes by Raman spectroscopy. J Raman Spectrosc 38:728–736Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Panic S, Guzsvány V, Kónya Z, Kukovecz Á, Boskovic G (2017) Kinetic, equilibrium and thermodynamic studies of thiamethoxam adsorption by multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:1297–1306Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ouyang Y, Cong LM, Chen L, Liu QX, Fang Y (2008) Raman study on single-walled carbon nanotubes and multi-walled carbon nanotubes with different laser excitation energies. Phys E 40:2386–2389Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bokobza L, Zhang J (2012) Raman spectroscopic characterization of multiwall carbon nanotubes and of composites. Express Polym Lett 6:601–608Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zhuang X, Chen D, Zhang S, Luan F, Chen L (2018) Reduced graphene oxide functionalized with a CoS2/ionic liquid composite and decorated with gold nanoparticles for voltammetric sensing of dopamine. Microchim Acta 185:166–174Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Luan F, Zhang S, Chen D, Zheng K, Zhuang X (2018) CoS2-decorated ionic liquid-functionalized graphene as a novel hydrazine electrochemical sensor. Talanta 182:529–535PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Chen D, Zhuang X, Zhai J, Zheng Y, Lu H, Chen L (2018) Preparation of highly sensitive Pt nanoparticles-carbon quantum dots/ionic liquid functionalized graphene oxide nanocomposites andapplication for H2O2 detection. Sensors Actuators B Chem 255:1500–1506Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Švancara I, Kalcher K, Walcarius A, Vytras K (2012) Electroanalysis with carbon paste electrodes. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Mikysek T, Švancara I, Kalcher K, Bartoš M, Vytřas K, Ludvík J (2009) New approaches to the characterization of carbon paste electrodes using the ohmic resistance effect and qualitative carbon paste indexes. Anal Chem 81:6327–6333PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Brownson DAC, Banks CE (2014) The handbook of graphene electrochemistry. Springer-Verlag, LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    McCreery RL (2008) Advanced carbon electrode materials for molecular electrochemistry. Chem Rev 108:2646–2687PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Wang J, Yang S, Guo D, Yu P, Li D, Ye J, Mao L (2009) Comparative studies on electrochemical activity of graphene nanosheets and carbon nanotubes. Electrochem Commun 11:1892–1895Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Tashkhourian J, Sheydaei O, Nami-Ana SF (2018) Copper nanoclusters conjugated silica nanoparticles modified on carbon paste as an electrochemical sensor for the determination of dopamine. Appl Organomet Chem 32:e4196Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Mazloum-Ardakani M, Beitollahi H, Ganjipour B, Naeimi H, Nejati M (2009) Electrochemical and catalytic investigations of dopamine and uric acid by modified carbon nanotube paste electrode. Bioelectrochemistry 75:1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Adekunle AS, Agboola BO, Pillay J, Ozoemena KI (2010) Electrocatalytic detection of dopamine at single-walled carbon nanotubes–iron(III) oxide nanoparticles platform. Sensors Actuators B Chem 148:93–102Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mazloum-Ardakani M, Naser-Sadrabadi A, Sheikh-Mohseni MA, Benvidi A, Naeimi H, Karshenas A (2013) An electrochemical sensor based on carbon nanotubes and a new Schiff base for selective determination of dopamine in the presence of uric acid, folic acid, and acetaminophen. Ionics 19:1663–1671Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Nagy G, Rice MR, Adams RN (1982) A new type of enzyme electrode: the ascorbic acid eliminator electrode. Life Sci 31:2611–2616PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jasmina Anojčić
    • 1
    Email author
  • Valéria Guzsvány
    • 1
  • Zoltán Kónya
    • 2
    • 3
  • Momir Mikov
    • 4
  1. 1.Faculty of Sciences, Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Environmental ProtectionUniversity of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia
  2. 2.Department of Applied and Environmental ChemistryUniversity of SzegedSzegedHungary
  3. 3.MTA-SZTE Reaction Kinetics and Surface Chemistry Research GroupSzegedHungary
  4. 4.Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Clinical PharmacologyUniversity of Novi SadNovi SadSerbia

Personalised recommendations