Advertisement

Ionics

pp 1–11 | Cite as

Aniline-mediated synthesis of carboxymethyl cellulose protected silver nanoparticles modified electrode for the differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry detection of mercury at trace level

  • S. Meenakshi
  • S. Devi
  • K. PandianEmail author
  • K. Chitra
  • P. Tharmaraj
Original Paper
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

Single-pot synthesis of carboxymethylcellulose-protected silver nanoparticles (CMC@AgNPs) was investigated using aniline as a reducing agent. Polymer matrix-embedded nanoparticles were synthesized by two different experimental conditions, namely under reflux and at room temperature. Similarly, a control experiment was carried out using polyvinylpyrrolidone as stabilizing agent under identical experimental conditions. Resulting AgNPs were isolated and characterized by UV–Vis, FT-IR, and SEM to identify shape, size, and type of capping action. CMC-capped AgNPs were octahedron-shaped whereas PVP-capped exhibited a core–shell kind of capping similar to a nested protection of AgNPs. The electrochemical property of the modified electrode was studied using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and cyclic voltammetry. Electrochemical detection of Hg2+ was investigated using CMC@AgNPs/GCE with an enhanced peak current as noted by DPASV method. Detection limit was found to be 0.19 nM, and its linear ranges were between 5 and 75 μM based on signal-to-noise ratio (S/N = 3). The present system can be utilized for the determination of Hg2+ in water samples at low-concentration ranges.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Silver nanoparticles Carboxymethylcellulose Polyvinylpyrrolidone Differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry Hg2+ detection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Facility, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, for providing scanning electron microscopy analysis. We express our sincere thanks to University Grants Commission—Centre with Potential for Excellence in Particular Area (UGC-CPEPA) Programme (F. No. 8-2/2008 (NS/PE) Dt. 14.02.2011), New Delhi, for providing financial assistance to carry out a part of the work. The authors would like to thank the National Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, University of Madras, for providing instrumental facilities.

Supplementary material

11581_2019_2858_MOESM1_ESM.doc (246 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 245 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Kowalski A, Siepak M, Boszke L (2007) Mercury contamination of surface and ground waters of Poznan, Poland. Pol J Environ Stud 16:67–74Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruna FA, Lorena BF, Franck MP, Giulia AW, Paula FV, Maylla RS, Jonaina F, Priscila RB, Mirian F, Luciana R, Ivanita S, Marıa JA, Mercedes S, Dalton VV (2012) Toxic effects of mercury on the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernhoft RA (2012) Mercury toxicity and treatment: a review of the literature. J Environ Public Health 2012:Article ID 460508 10 pagesCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mehrorang G, Mohammad RF, Ardeshir S, Fahimeh S (2006) Highly selective and sensitive preconcentration of mercury ion and determination by cold vapor atomic absorption spectroscopy. Anal Lett 39:1171–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Passariello B, Barbaro M, Quaresima S, Casciello A, Marabini A (1996) Determination of mercury by inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry. Microchem J 54:348–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ornella A, Agnese G, Mery M, Giuseppina P, Edoardo M (2008) Determination of mercury by anodic stripping voltammetry with a gold nanoparticle-modified glassy carbon electrode. Electroanalysis 20:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jingminng G, Ting Z, Dandan S, Lizhi Z (2010) Monodispersed Au nanoparticles decorated graphene as an enhanced sensing platform for ultrasensitive stripping voltammetric detection of mercury (II). Sensors Actuators B Chem 150:491–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bernalte E, Sanchez CM, Gil EP (2011) Determination of mercury in ambient water samples by using anodic stripping voltammetry on screen-printed gold electrodes. Anal Chim Acta 689:60–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hezard T, Fajerwerg K, Evrard D, Colliere V, Behra P, Gros P (2012) Gold nanoparticles electrodeposited on glassy carbon using cyclic voltammetry: application to Hg (II) trace analysis. J Electroanal Chem 664:46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xu H, Jiang H, Li X, Wan G (2015) Synthesis and electrochemical capacitance performance of polyaniline doped with lignosulfonate. RSC Adv 5:76116–76121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Li Y, Zhao X, Xu Q, Zhang Q, Chen D (2011) Facile preparation and enhanced capacitance of the polyaniline/sodium alginate nanofiber network for supercapacitors. Langmuir 27:6458–6463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paulaj P, Janak N, Sandhya S, Pandian K (2011) Single pot synthesis of polyaniline protected silver nanoparticles by interfacial polymerization and study its application on electrochemical oxidation of hydrazine. Colloids Surf A 377:28–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ivanov S, Lange U, Tsakova V, Mirsky VM (2010) Electrocatalytically active nanocomposite from palladium nanoparticles and polyaniline: oxidation of hydrazine. Sensors Actuators B Chem 150:271–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang Z, Li L, Liu E (2013) Graphene ultrathin film modified with bismuth nanparticles and polyaniline porous layers for detection of lead and cadmium ions in acetate buffer solutions. Thin Solid Films 544:362–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Dong Y, Ding Y, Zhou Y, Chen J, Wang (2014) Differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetric determination of Pb ion at a montmorillonites/polyaniline nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrode. J Electroanal Chem 717-718:206–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ruecha N, Rodthongkum N, Cate DM, Volckens J, Chailapakul O, Henry CS (2015) Sensitive electrochemical sensor using a graphene-polyaniline nanocomposite for simultaneous detection of Zn (II), Cd (II) and Pb (II). Anal Chim Acta 878:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Syed AA, Dinesan MK (1991) Review: polyaniline—a novel polymeric material. Talanta 38:815–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sazou D, Kourouzidou M, Pavlidou E (2007) Potentiodynamic and potentiostatic deposition of polyaniline on stainless steel: electrochemical and structural studies for a potential application to corrosion control. Electrochim Acta 52:4385–4397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jing X, Wang Y, Wu D, Qiang J (2007) Sonochemical synthesis of polyaniline nanofibers. Ultrason Sonochem 14:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Blaha M, Riesova M, Zednik J, Anzlovar A, Zigon M, Vohlidal J (2011) Polyaniline synthesis with iron (III) chloride-hydrogen peroxide catalyst system: reaction cources and polymer structure study. Synth Met 161:1217–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ivanov S, Tsakova V (2002) Influence of copper anion complexes on the incorporation of metal partiles in polyaniline part 1: copper citrate complex. J Appl Electrochem 32:701–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Male U, Srinivasan P, Singu S (2015) Incorporation of polyaniline nanofibres on graphene oxide by interfacial polymerization pathway for supercapacitor. Int Nano Lett 5:231–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mascaro LH, Goncalves D, Bulhoes LOS (2004) Electrocatalytic properties and electrochemical stability of polyaniline and polyaniline modified with platinum nanoparticles in formaldehyde medium. Thin Solid Films 461:243–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Afzal AB, Akhtar MJ, Nadeem M, Hassan MM (2009) Investigation of structural and electrical properties of polyaniline/gold nanocomposites. J Phys Chem C 113:17560–17565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kooti M, Kharazi P, Motamedi H (2014) Preparation, characterization and antibacterial activity of CoFe2O4/polyaniline/Ag nanocomposite. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 45:2698–2704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Blinova N, Bober V, Hromadkova P, Trchova J, Stejskal M, Prokes J (2010) Polyaniline-silver nanocomposites prepared by the oxidation of aniline with silver nitrate in acetic acid solutions. Polym Int 59:437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ravindra P, Singh A, Tiwari A, Pandey C (2011) Silver/polyaniline nanocomposite for the electrocatalytic hydrazine oxidation. J Inorg Organomet Polym 21:788–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bhowmick B, Mondal B, Maity D, Mollick MRM, Bain MK, Bera NK, Rana D, Chattopadhyay S, Chattopadhyay D (2013) In-situ fabrication of polyaniline-silver nanocomposites using soft template of sodium alginate. J Appl Polym Sci 129:3551–3557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zaheee K, Shaeel AA, Abdullah YO, Al-Youbi AO (2011) Preparation and characterization of silver nanoparticles by chemical reduction method. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 82:513–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gao Y, Shan D, Cao F, Gong J, Li X, Ma H, Su Z, Qu L (2009) Silver/polyaniline composite nanotubes: one step synthesis and electrocatalytic activity for neurotransmitter dopamine. J Phys Chem C 113:15175–15181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tamboli MS, Kulkarni M, Patil RH, Gade WN, Navale SC, Kale BB (2012) Nanowires of silver polyaniline nanocomposite synthesized via in-situ polymerization and its novel functionality as an antibacterial agent. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 92:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Khanna PK, Singh N, Charan S, Viswanath AK (2005) Synthesis of Ag/polyaniline nanocomposite via an in-situ photo redox mechanism. Mater Chem Phys 92:214–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Massoumi B, Fathalipour S, Massoudi A, Hassanzadeh M, Entezami AA (2013) Ag/polyaniline nanocomposites: synthesis, characterization and application to the detection of dopamine and tyrosine. J Appl Polym Sci 130:2780–2789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang X, Shen Y, Xie A, Chen S (2013) One-step synthesis of Ag@PANI nanocomposites and their application to detection of mercury. Mater Chem Phys 140:487–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hashem M, Sharaf S, Abd El-Hady MM, Hebeish A (2013) Synthesis and characterization of novel carboxymethylcellulose hydrogels and carboxymethylcellulose-hydrogel-ZnO-nanocomposites. Carbohydr Polym 95:421–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hebeish AA, El-Rafie MH, Abdel-Mohdy FA, Abdel-Halim ES, Emam HE (2010) Carboxymethyl cellulose for green synthesis and stabilization of silver nanoparticles. Carbohydr Polym 82:933–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ali H, Hashem M, Abd El-Hady MM, Sharaf S (2013) Development of CMC hydrogels loaded with silver nanoparticles for medical applications. Carbohydr Polym 92:407–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Singh V, Ahmad S (2012) Synthesis and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulose ilver nanoparticles-silica hybrid for amylase immobilization. Cellulose 19:1759–1769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Breitwiaser D, Moghaddam MM, Spirk S, Baghbanzaeh M, Pivec T, Fasl H, Ribitsch V, Kappe CO (2013) In-situ preparation of silver nanocomposites on cellulosic fibers—microwave vs. conventional heating. Carbohydr Polym 94:677–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kaur B, Srivastava R, Satpai B (2015) Silver nanoparticle decorated polyaniline-zeolite nancomposite material based non-enzymatic electrochemical sensor for nanomolar detection of lindane. RSC Adv 5:57657–57665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Meenakshi S, Devi S, Pandian K, Devendiran R, Selvaraj M (2016) Sunlight assisted synthesis of silver nanoparticles in zeolite matrix and study of its application on electrochemical detection of dopamine and uric acid in urine samples. Mater Sci Eng C 69:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Suherman AL, Ngamchuea K, Tanner EEL, Sokolov SV, Holter J, Young NP, Compton RG (2017) Electrochemical detection of ultratrace (picomolar) levels of Hg2+ using a silver nanoparticle modified glassy carbon electrode. Anal Chem 89:7166–7173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wei J, Yang D, Chen H, Gao Y, Li H (2014) Stripping voltammetric determination of mercury (II) based on SWCNT-PhSH modified gold electrode. Sensors Actuators B Chem 190:968–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cesarino I, Cavalheiro ETG (2008) Thiol functionalized silica thin film modified electrode in determination of mercury ions in natural water. Electroanalysis 20:2301–2309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Anandhakumar S, Mathiyarasu J, Phani KLN (2012) Anodic stripping voltammetric detection of mercury (II) using Au-PEDOT modified carbon paste electrode. Anal Methods 4:2486–2489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Walcarius A, Delacote C (2005) Mercuty (II) binding to thiol functionalized mesoporous silicas: critical effect of pH and sorbent properties on capacity and selectivity. Anal Chim Acta 547:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zhou H, Wang X, Yu P, Chen X, Mao L (2011) Sensitive and selective voltammetric measurement of Hg2+ by rational covalent functionalization of graphene oxide with cysteamine. Analyst 137:305–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Deng WF, Tan YM, Li YY, Wen YQ, Su ZH, Huang Z (2010) Square wave voltammetric determination of Hg (II) using thiol functionalized chitosan-multiwalled carbon nanotubes nancomposite film electrode. Mictochimica Acta 169:367–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ju H, Leech D (2000) Electrochemical study of a metallothionein modified gold disk electrode and its action on Hg2+ cations. J Electroanal Chem 484:150–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0728(00)00071-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ding X, Kong L, Wang J, Fang F, Li D, Liu J (2013) Highly sensitive SERS detection of Hg2+ ions in aqueous media using gold nanoparticles/ graphene heterojunctions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:7072–7078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Meng F, Xu H, Yao X, Qin X, Jiang T, Gao S, Zhang Y, Yang D, Liu X (2017) Mercury detection based on label-free and isothermal enzyme free amplified fluorescence platform. Talanta 162:368–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wang Q, Yang X, Yang Y, Liu P, Wang K, Huang J, Liu J, Song C, Wang J (2015) Colorimetric detection of mercury ion based on unmodified gold nanoparticles and target triggered hybridization chain reaction amplification. Spectrochim Acta 136:283–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gao ZF, Song WW, Luo HQ, Li NB (2014) Detection of mercury ions (II) based on non cross linking aggregation of double stranded DNA modified gold nanoparticles by resonance Rayleigh scattering method. Biosens Bioelectron 65:360–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chen D, Hu B, Huang C (2009) Chitosan modified ordered mesoporous silica as micro column packing materials for on-line flow injection inductively couple plasma optical emission spectroscopy determination of trace heavy metals in environmental water samples. Talanta 78:491–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kamyabi MA, Agheaei A (2017) A simple and selective approach for determination of trace Hg (II) using electromembrane extraction followed by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Spectrochim Acta B 128:17–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Meenakshi
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Devi
    • 1
  • K. Pandian
    • 1
    Email author
  • K. Chitra
    • 3
  • P. Tharmaraj
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Inorganic ChemistryUniversity of MadrasChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryVels Institute of Science, Technology & Advanced StudiesChennaiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Chemical Engineering, A.C. TechAnna UniversityChennaiIndia
  4. 4.Department of ChemistryThiagarajar CollegeMaduraiIndia

Personalised recommendations