Advertisement

Ionics

, Volume 25, Issue 2, pp 503–511 | Cite as

Functionalized N-doped hollow carbon spheres as sulfur host with enhanced electrochemical performances of lithium-sulfur batteries

  • Xiaoping Li
  • Zhenghui Pan
  • Zihao Li
  • Yaotang Zhong
  • Xianshu Wang
  • Mengqing Xu
  • Youhao Liao
  • Lidan Xing
  • Yongcai Qiu
  • Weishan LiEmail author
Original Paper
  • 170 Downloads

Abstract

A novel composite, functionalized N-doped hollow carbon spheres (F-NHCS), is proposed as cathode host for improving the cycle stability and rate capability of a Li-S battery, which involves the functionalization of NHCS with oxygen-containing groups. The high electronic conductivity and abundant oxygen-containing functional groups of F-NHCS can not only be served as the conductive matrix for loading S as the cathode (F-NHCS-S) but also exhibit strong absorption capability to anchor S atoms and thus effectively solve the dissolution issue of intermediates polysulfides during cycling. As a result, the as-obtained F-NHCS-S cathode exhibits excellent performances: delivering an initial specific capacity of 827 mAh g−1 at 0.2 C with about 74 wt% S loading and retaining a specific capacity of 549 mAh g−1 after 100 cycles, compared to the respective 747 mAh g−1 and 182 mAh g−1 of the cathode based on the host without N-doping and functionalization (HCS-S). The fabrications of the hosts and the corresponding cathodes are demonstrated by the physical characterizations from SEM, TEM, XPS, XRD, FT-IR, BET, and TGA.

Keywords

Li-S batteries Functionalized N-doped hollow carbon sphere Sulfur cathode Cycle stability Rate capability 

Notes

Funding information

This work is supported by the key project of Science and Technology in Guangdong Province (2017A010106006) and Extracurricular Research Project of South China Normal University (18HHGB02).

References

  1. 1.
    Mikhaylik YV, Akridge JR (2004) Polysulfide shuttle study in the Li/S battery system. J Electrochem Soc 151:A1969–A1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruce PG, Freunberger SA, Hardwick LJ, Tarascon JM (2012) Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage. Nat Mater 11:19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yin YX, Xin S, Guo YG, Wan LJ (2013) Lithium-sulfur batteries: electrochemistry, materials, and prospects. Angew Chem Int Ed 52:13186–13200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li XG, Rao MM, Li WS (2016) Sulfur encapsulated in porous carbon nanospheres and coated with conductive polyaniline as cathode of lithium–sulfur battery. J Solid State Electrochem 20:153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu HL, Xia L, Ren J, Zheng QJ, Xie FY, Jie WJ, Xu CG, Lin DM (2018) A multidimensional and nitrogen-doped graphene/hierarchical porous carbon as a sulfur scaffold for high performance lithium sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta 278:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hagen M, Hanselmann D, Ahlbrecht K, Maça R, Gerber D, Tübke J (2015) Lithium-sulfur cells: the gap between the state-of-the-art and the requirements for high energy battery cells. Adv Energy Mater 5:1401986–1401996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blanga R, Goor M, Burstein L, Rosenberg Y, Gladkich A, Logvinuk D, Shechtman I, Golodnitsky D (2016) The search for a solid electrolyte, as a polysulfide barrier, for lithium/sulfur batteries. J Solid State Electrochem 20:3393–3404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rao MM, Li XG, Liao YH, Li XP, Li WS (2015) Preparation and performance of a composite polyimide/poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene)/nano-Al2O3 polymer electrolyte for lithium-sulfur cell. Ionics 21:1937–1943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li GC, Li GR, Ye SH, Gao XP (2012) A polyaniline-coated sulfur/carbon composite with an enhanced high-rate capability as a cathode material for lithium/sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater 2:1238–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xu N, Qian T, Liu XJ, Liu J, Chen Y, Yan CL (2016) Greatly suppressed shuttle effect for improved lithium sulfur battery performance through short chain intermediates. Nano Lett 17:538–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rao MM, Li WS, Cairns EJ (2012) Porous carbon-sulfur composite cathode for lithium/sulfur cells. Electrochem Commun 17:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li XG, Rao MM, Chen DR, Lin HB, Liu YL, Liao YH, Xing LD, Li WS (2015) Sulfur supported by carbon nanotubes and coated with polyaniline: preparation and performance as cathode of lithium-sulfur cell. Electrochim Acta 166:93–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gao Z, Zhang YY, Song NN, Li XD (2017) Towards flexible lithium-sulfur battery from natural cotton textile. Electrochim Acta 246:507–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin Z, Liu ZC, Fu WJ, Dudney NJ, Liang CD (2013) Phosphorous pentasulfide as a novel additive for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater 23:1064–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li XG, Rao MM, Lin HB, Chen DR, Liu YL, Liu SZ, Liao YH, Xing LD, Xu MQ, Li WS (2015) Sulfur loaded in curved graphene and coated with conductive polyaniline: preparation and performance as a cathode for lithium–sulfur batteries. J Mater Chem A 3:18098–18104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chen L, Shaw LL (2014) Recent advances in lithium–sulfur batteries. J Power Sources 267:770–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zeng SB, Li LG, Yu JP, Wang N, Chen SW (2018) Highly crosslinked organosulfur copolymer nanosheets with abundant mesopores as cathode materials for efficient lithium-sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta 263:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ren WC, Ma W, Zhang SF, Tang BT (2018) Nitrogen-doped carbon fiber foam enabled sulfur vapor deposited cathode for high performance lithium sulfur batteries. Chem Eng J 341:441–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Deng WN, Hu AP, Chen XH, Zhang SY, Tang QL, Liu Z, Fan BB, Xiao KK (2016) Sulfur-impregnated 3D hierarchical porous nitrogen-doped aligned carbon nanotubes as high-performance cathode for lithium-sulfur batteries. J Power Sources 322:138–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang H, Zuo PJ, Hua JF, Ma YL, Du CY, Cheng XQ, Gao YZ, Yin GP (2017) Improved rate performance of lithium sulfur batteries by in-situ anchoring of lithium iodide in carbon/sulfur cathode. Electrochim Acta 238:257–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu YG, Wang WK, Wang AB, Jin ZQ, Zhao HL, Yang YS (2017) N-doped carbyne polysulfide as cathode material for lithium/sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta 232:142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yan HM, Cheng M, Zhong BH, Chen YX (2016) Three-dimensional nitrogen-doped graphene/sulfur composite for lithium-sulfur battery. Ionics 22:1999–2006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang XW, Zhang ZA, Qu YH, Lai YQ, Li J (2014) Nitrogen-doped graphene/sulfur composite as cathode material for high capacity lithium–sulfur batteries. J Power Sources 256:361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Song JX, Gordin ML, Xu T, Chen SR, Yu ZX, Sohn H, Lu J, Ren Y, Duan YH, Wang DH (2015) Strong lithium polysulfide chemisorption on electroactive sites of nitrogen-doped carbon composites for high-performance lithium-sulfur battery cathodes. Angew Chem Int Edit 54:4325–4329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pang Q, Tang JT, Huang H, Liang X, Hart C, Tam KC, Nazar LF (2015) A nitrogen and sulfur dual-doped carbon derived from polyrhodanine@cellulose for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Mater 27:6021–6028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee J, Park S-K, Piao YZ (2016) N-doped carbon framework/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite as a sulfur reservoir for lithium-sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta 222:1345–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li Q, Zhang ZA, Guo ZP, Lai YQ, Zhang K, Li J (2014) Improved cyclability of lithium–sulfur battery cathode using encapsulated sulfur in hollow carbon nanofiber@nitrogen-doped porous carbon core–shell composite. Carbon 78:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Qiu YC, Li WF, Zhao W, Li GZ, Hou Y, Liu MN, Zhou LS, Ye FM, Li HF, Wei ZH, Yang SH, Duan WH, Ye YF, Guo JH, Zhang YG (2014) High-rate, ultralong cycle-life lithium/sulfur batteries enabled by nitrogen-doped graphene. Nano Lett 14:4821–4827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang HL, Yang Y, Liang YY, Robinson JT, Li YG, Jackson A, Cui Y, Dai HJ (2011) Graphene-wrapped sulfur particles as a rechargeable lithium–sulfur battery cathode material with high capacity and cycling stability. Nano Lett 11:2644–2647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Feng M, Li HJ, Huang M, Kang JW, Feng HG, Su QM, Zhang FM, Du GH (2018) Nitrogen-doped nanostructured porous carbon derived from monosodium glutamate for high-performance lithium sulfur battery. Mater Res Bull 99:429–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Liu ZG, Liu BL, Guo PQ, Shang XN, Lv MZ, Liu DQ, He DY (2018) Enhanced electrochemical kinetics in lithium-sulfur batteries by using carbon nanofibers/manganese dioxide composite as a bifunctional coating on sulfur cathode. Electrochim Acta 269:180–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sun ZJ, Xiao M, Wang SJ, Han DM, Song SQ, Chen GH, Meng YZ (2015) Specially designed carbon black nanoparticle-sulfur composite cathode materials with a novel structure for lithium–sulfur battery application. J Power Sources 285:478–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Choudhury S, Krüner B, Massuti-Ballester P, Tolosa A, Prehal C, Grobelsek I, Paris O, Borchardt L, Presser V (2017) Microporous novolac-derived carbon beads/sulfur hybrid cathode for lithium-sulfur batteries. J Power Sources 357:198–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Geng XY, Rao MM, Li XP, Li WS (2013) Highly dispersed sulfur in multi-walled carbon nanotubes for lithium/sulfur battery. J Solid State Electrochem 17:987–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chen MF, Jiang SX, Cai SY, Wang XY, Xiang KX, Ma ZY, Song P, Fisher AC (2017) Hierarchical porous carbon modified with ionic surfactants as efficient sulfur hosts for the high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem Eng J 313:404–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Xia Y, Fang RY, Xiao Z, Huang H, Gan YP, Yan RJ, Lu XH, Liang C, Zhang J, Tao XY, Zhang WK (2017) Confining sulfur in N-oped porous carbon microspheres derived from microalgaes for advanced lithium-sulfur batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9:23782–23791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sui ZY, Yang QS, Zhou HY, Li X, Sun YN, Xiao PW, Wei ZX, Han BH (2017) Nitrogen-doped graphene aerogel as both a sulfur host and an effective interlayer for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. Nanotechnology 28:495701–495708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Xu GY, Yuan JR, Geng XM, Dou H, Chen L, Yan XH, Zhu HL (2017) Caterpillar-like graphene confining sulfur by restacking effect for high performance lithium sulfur batteries. Chem Eng J 322:454–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang MR, Zhang HM, Zhang YN, Li J, Zhang FX, Hu W (2013) A modified hierarchical porous carbon for lithium/sulfur batteries with improved capacity and cycling stability. J Solid State Electrochem 17:2243–2250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pang Y, Wei JS, Wang YG, Xia YY (2018) Synergetic protective effect of the ultralight MWCNTs/NCQDs modified separator for highly stable lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Energy Mater 8:1702288–1702298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Liu C, Xu ZK, Liu L (2018) Covalent bonded graphene/neutral red nanocomposite prepared by one-step electrochemical method and its electrocatalytic properties toward uric acid. Electroanal 30:1017–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Liu FY, Liang JY, Zhang C, Yu L, Zhao JX, Liu C, Lan Q, Chen SR, Cao YC, Zheng G (2017) Reduced graphene oxide encapsulated sulfur spheres for the lithium-sulfur battery cathode. Results Phys 7:250–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Liu QC, Xu JJ, Yuan S, Chang ZW, Xu D, Yin YB, Li L, Zhong HX, Jiang YS, Yan JM, Zhang XB (2015) Artificial protection film on lithium metal anode toward long-cycle-life lithium-oxygen batteries. Adv Mater 27:5241–5247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zhang YG, Sun LC, Li HP, Tan TZ, Li JD (2018) Porous three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries. J Alloys Compd 739:290–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wu HW, Huang Y, Xu S, Zhang WC, Wang K, Zong M (2017) Fabricating three-dimensional hierarchical porous N-doped graphene by a tunable assembly method for interlayer assisted lithium-sulfur batteries. Chem Eng J 327:855–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mi K, Chen SW, Xi BJ, Kai SS, Jiang Y, Feng JK, Qian YT, Xiong SL (2017) Sole chemical confinement of polysulfides on nonporous nitrogen/oxygen dual-doped carbon at the kilogram scale for lithium-sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater 27:1604265–1604277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zhang YZ, Zhang Z, Liu S, Li GR, Gao XP (2018) Free-standing porous carbon nanofiber/carbon nanotube film as sulfur immobilizer with high areal capacity for lithium-sulfur battery. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 10:8749–8757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Shan JQ, Liu YX, Su YZ, Liu P, Zhuang XD, Wu DQ, Zhang F, Feng XL (2016) Graphene-directed two-dimensional porous carbon frameworks for high-performance lithium–sulfur battery cathodes. J Mater Chem A 4:314–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Yang DX, Velamakanni A, Bozoklu G, Park S, Stoller M, Pine RD, Stankovich S, Jung I, Field DA, Ventrice CA Jr, Ruof RS (2009) Chemical analysis of graphene oxide films after heat and chemical treatments by X-ray photoelectron and micro-Raman spectroscopy. Carbon 47:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Balach J, Jaumann T, Klose M, Oswald S, Eckert J, Giebeler L (2015) Functional mesoporous carbon-coated separator for long-life, high-energy lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv Funct Mater 25:5285–5291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Liang YY, Deng NP, Ju JG, Zhou XH, Yan J, Zhong CL, Kang WM, Cheng BW (2018) Facilitation of lithium polysulfides adsorption by nitrogen doped carbon nanofibers with 3D interconnected pore structures for high-stable lithium-sulfur batteries. Electrochim Acta 281:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Xu GY, Ding B, Shen LF, Nie P, Han JP, Zhang XG (2013) Sulfur embedded in metal organic framework-derived hierarchically porous carbon nanoplates for high performance lithium–sulfur battery. J Mater Chem A 1:4490–4496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Li HP, Wei YQ, Ren J, Zhang WL, Zhang CW, Zhang YG (2018) Three-dimensionally ordered hierarchically porous polypyrrole loading sulfur as high-performance cathode for lithium/sulfur batteries. Polymer 137:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Yuan GH, Jin HF, Jin YZ, Wu LZ (2018) Hybrids of MnO2 nanoparticles anchored on graphene sheets as efficient sulfur hosts for high-performance lithium sulfur batteries. J Solid State Electrochem 22:693–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Guo JC, Xu YH, Wang CS (2011) Sulfur-impregnated disordered carbon nanotubes cathode for lithium-sulfur batteries. Nano Lett 11:4288–4294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Li ZH, Li XG, Liao YH, Li XP, Li WS (2016) Sulfur loaded in micropore-rich carbon aerogel as cathode of lithium-sulfur battery with improved cyclic stability. J Power Sources 334:23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaoping Li
    • 1
  • Zhenghui Pan
    • 1
  • Zihao Li
    • 1
  • Yaotang Zhong
    • 1
  • Xianshu Wang
    • 1
  • Mengqing Xu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Youhao Liao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lidan Xing
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yongcai Qiu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Weishan Li
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Chemistry and EnvironmentSouth China Normal UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Engineering Research Center of MTEES (Ministry of Education), Research Center of BMET (Guangdong Province), and Key Laboratory of ETESPG (GHEI)South China Normal UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations